SonOfTheGods

pretty dark out there http://thetaobums.com/topic/31320-i-will-say-something-this-from-my-own-thoughts-as-i-have-yet-to-see-this-anywhere-else/

with all those stars and sun and moon radiating light, it should be extremely bright in outer space..

Yeah I know, but I didn't want to type that the world's military might be surrounding those protected areas oops..

No because my cell phone wouldn't get a signal.

http://thetaobums.com/topic/31320-i-will-say-something-this-from-my-own-thoughts-as-i-have-yet-to-see-this-anywhere-else/ if you think outside the box, think here

can you prove it is LIVE?

I am not disagreeing with you. However, I have never taken a flight into outer space to capture a photo, so we have to believe that others have accomplished this. So the question is, do you trust their proof? Basically, this comes down to a trust issue, if we are relying solely on THEIR photographic evidence.

Yes, sounds conclusive, doesn't it? However, searching on YouTube will also display videos that will counter those claims, as well.

Given enough parallel realities, everything is truth

Think outside the box, sums it up. There is a lot taken for granted, in many academic subjects. Just because the majority says it is, does not necessarily make it correct. When someone makes a radical idea, it is usually ignored. Then the messenger is discredited. Then violent opposition to the message. Then the message is accepted by the majority, which makes it correct, by default

The ancients had many novel ideas about the shape of the earth. The Babylonians thought the earth was hollow, to provide space for their underworld. The Egyptians thought the earth a square, (with four corners) with mountains at the edge supporting the vault of the sky. The early Christian Church accepted Aristotle's spherical earth. But a few malcontents within the Church pointed out that the Bible speaks of 'the four corners' of the earth. In the 5th century CE the monk Cosmas Indicopleustes, in his Christian Topography, described a square earth with a heavenly vault, much like the Egyptian model. Tertulian also was a flat-earther. Science writer Robert J. Schadewald gave me permission to quote the following paragraphs in which he summarizes the Biblical evidence which flat-earthers use to justify their position. He wrote this to a geocentrist fundamentalist who was arguing that the Bible supports a fixed, non-moving earth, with the all the rest of the universe moving around us at about one revolution per day. Bob, of course agreed that the Bible does support that view, but wonders why this particular fundamentalist did not also accept the idea that the earth is flat, since that has basis in the Bible also. ...The Bible is, from Genesis to Revelation, a flat-earth book. ...While the Bible nowhere states categorically that the earth is flat, numerous Old Testament verses clearly show that the ancient Hebrews were flat-earthers. This comes through more clearly in modern translations such as the New English Bible, but it's clear enough in the King James Version. The Genesis creation story says the earth is covered by a vault (firmament) and that the celestial bodies move inside the vault. (See Genesis 1:6-8 and 1:17. Note that, even in KJV, while there are waters "above" the firmament, the celestial bodies are "in" it.) This makes no sense unless one assumes that the earth is essentially flat. That the Hebrews considered the sun and moon to be small bodies near to the earth is clear from Joshua 10:12, which gives specific localities [geographic] in which they stood still. Isaiah 40:22 says that "God sits throned on the vaulted roof of earth, whose inhabitants are like grasshoppers." In the book of Job, Eliphaz the Temanite says God "walks to and fro on the vault of heaven.'' (Job 22:14. The KJV translators copped out on the last two verses, but in both cases the implications are clear.) That the earth was considered essentially flat is clear from Daniel, who said, "I saw a tree of great height at the centre of the earth; the tree grew and became strong, reaching with its top to the sky and visible to the earth's farthest bounds." (Daniel 4:10-11) Only on a flat earth could one see a tree reaching the sky (dome?) from "the earth's farthest bounds." The New Testament also implies a flat earth. For instance, Matthew 4:8 says that "The devil took him [Jesus] to a very high mountain, and showed him all the kingdoms of the world in their glory." From a sufficiently high mountain, one could see all of the kingdoms of the world"but only if the earth were flat. The same applies to Revelation 1:7, which says that at the second coming, "Every eye shall see him." Finally, Revelation 7:1 refers to "the four corners of the earth," and corners are not generally associated with spheres. Actually, if you want a good picture of the hebrew conception of the earth, look in a Jewish encyclopedia under "cosmography." You might also want to read the so-called "Ethiopic" Book of Enoch, written perhaps 150 B.C. While not canonical, it's paraphrased or quoted a couple of times in the New Testament, so it was highly regarded in those days. Its flat earth implications are even stronger. The Biblical cosmos model derives from Egyptian sources, which had a flat earth covered by a rounded sky vault supported at the four corners of the earth by high mountains. The 'waters above and the waters below' in the book of Genesis refer to the Babylonian notion that the waters were divided, and some remained above the sky vault. The vault was like a leaky roof and some of that water falls down as rain. Astonishingly, some present-day 'biblical creationists' now argue that this water above the sky was the source of the flood in the time of Noah. They realize that if the waters did cover the earth to the highest mountain tops, there just isn't any source of that much water in the earth or in the atmosphere! So it must have come from somewhere else, they argue, in their pathetic attempt to make creationism appear 'scientific'. http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/flat/flateart.htm

You can ask a group of scientists about Quantum Physics and they would beat the snot out of each other arguing.

That requires you believe in astronaut testimony. Taken anyone's word for anything, at face value, is not always the only/best choice I only post stuff to get people to think, and research

Flat Earth FAQ "Beyond the icy bounds of the Southern Circle, lies a vast circular ocean, and beyond that the forbidden continent, Antichtone; any ship or plane will reach the Aether Screen and go around this landmass by accident. Admiral R. Byrd discovered that Antichtone/Atlantis had lakes, forests, mammoths and hills covered with vegetation, far inland - exactly what was seen by the Nazis during their 1938-1939 expedition. There are vast tunnels under the Earth; some of these lead beyond the Ice Wall. Alexander the Great and his armies made use of these tunnels; so did the Nazis in many of their campaigns. This is the only way to reach Antichtone, and it is why many mammoth fossils are found in vast caverns under ground, whereas modern elephant remains tend to scatter themselves over the open plains of Africa." http://www.dagonbytes.com/thelibrary/lovecraft/mountainsofmaddness.htm At the Mountains of Madness by H. P. Lovecraft Written in March of 1931

Flat Earth model: UN Logo:

There are A LOT of people that believe the Earth is flat. Biblical models confirm that for the religious flat earthers. Revelation 7:1, Job 38:13, Jeremiah 16:19 and Daniel 4:11 are some of the scriptures cited.

Are you wanting me to post louder, like bigger font?

Sloppy Zhang: "I have heard from people who have spent a lot of time practicing and developing themselves according to Bardon's system. They say (and Bardon says this as well) that it is imperative that you get to step 8 before working on the Evocation/Kabbalah books. Why? Because when you are on step 8 you have developed all of the faculties to directly perceive energy yourself, and what you are doing yourself, rather than parroting a formula made by someone else. For that reason, I have heard that Bardon's Evocations/Kabbalah were "incomplete" in the sense that they are missing certain aspects, or have certain aspects reversed. If you have the right faculties cultivated you'll see where the missing piece is or what things need to be reversed. If not, you'll be spinning your wheels. Which is why they say "don't skip steps" in Bardon :P" -------- Bardon's cabala book, third in series in incomplete: There are a few specific omissions in the latter part of KTQ. The third and final section of KTQ is titled "Practice -- The Magic of Formulas" and is dedicated to the remaining three keys. Each key refers to the number of letters involved in each formula. Thus the second key involves combining two letters; the third involves three letters, and so on. There are ten such keys according to Bardon, but he gives instructions for only the first four. At the end of the twelfth Step, Bardon speaks about Elemental formulas and the use of Divine Names and Beings.

I'm pretty sure no one actually watched the videos I posted, which is different from the other documentation I posted. Here's a different approach: http://vimeo.com/31609589 http://www.caesarsmessiah.com/

Tracking down evidence for a Historical Jesus, and Bollocks, go hand in hand

I made Ten posts, suporting my claim, and you wrote as an opposing argument, you just sort of do not feel this is true. Would you mind posting some concrete Historical Evidence that Jesus was an Actual Person? I personally examined all the so called evidence, but you seem pretty certain of your stand point. Looking forward to your evidence, should you take that challenge. Thanks

Every day, almost 16,000 children die from hunger-related causes http://www.bread.org/hunger/global/

New Testament Bible Authored by the Calpurnius Piso's of Rome Part 1/5

The Roman Piso family wrote the New Testament-invented Jesus http://www.trueauthorship.blogspot.com/

Published in November 1979, The True Authorship of the New Testament is the first book in history that explains the true authorship of the New Testament. This historically important book was written by an author who was wondering why slick former Jews were getting into the evangelism business and fleecing Christians of their money, all in the name of Jesus. His 35 year research has uncovered the whole horrible truth, namely that Christianity was created by the Calpurnius Piso's of Rome. It is a fictional story used by the Piso's to take over Rome, which they eventually did after 136 c.e. They also forced the Jews to insert into their religious books many of Piso's own works to create prophecies for the coming of his fictional character, Jesus. If you are a priest, pastor or muslim, this book is a must read if you are to get a head in your respective organizations. All your top leadership know this information--why not you? For those Christians and Muslims that are worried about Satan, we will put your mind at ease. The name and the concept of Satan, the Devil, Lucifer etc. was created by Arius Calpurnius Piso. What's interesting is he also played the part in the story. http://www.vectorpub.com/True_Authorship_of_the_New_Testament.html