Isimsiz Biri

You are making your own propaganda. May be you can catch some fools to pay money for your Bullshit from here but not too many people.

Simple, I am following your Satanic logic.

Brian, I am sick of this attitude of yours. Post whatever you like, for your every example, I will post three. You are trying to help Nungali. You are trying to help RongzomFan. You are trying to help 3bob. For one time, be a man and challenge me YOURSELF. With your own ideas.

This is absurd. You can not post any examples? Let me do it for you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_at_Midnight Freedom at Midnight (1975) is a book by Larry Collins and Dominique Lapierre. It describes the events in the Indian independence movement in 1947-48, beginning with the appointment of Lord Mountbatten of Burma as the last viceroy of British India, and ending with the death and funeral of Mahatma Gandhi. The authors having interviewed many of those who were there, including Lord Mountbatten of Burma, the book gives a detailed account of the last year of British India, the princely states' reactions to independence (including descriptions of the Indian princes' colorful and extravagant lifestyles), the partition of India and Pakistan on religious grounds, and the bloodshed that followed. It also covers in detail the events leading to the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi, as well as the life and motives of British-educated Jawaharlal Nehru and Pakistani leader Muhammad Ali Jinnah. The book is a result of deeply scanned and researched events, which often are left out by other historians. For example, the crucial maps setting the boundary separating India and Pakistan were drawn that year by Cyril Radcliffe. Radcliffe had never visited India in his life before being appointed as the chairman of the Boundary Commission. The description of the very British-style summertime capital Shimla in the Himalayas and how supplies were carried up steep mountains by porters each year is interesting. The book also explains the fury of both Hindus and Muslims, misled by their communal leaders, during the partition, and the biggest mass slaughter in the history of India as millions of unfortunate people were uprooted by the partition and tried to migrate laboriously by train, oxcart, and on foot to new places designated for their particular religious group. Many migrants fell victim to bandits and bloodthirsty religious extremists of both dominant religions. One incident quoted is particularly terrifying: it describes a canal in Lahore that ran with blood and floating bodies. A tragedy that befell a poor but sincere interfaith peasant couple is heart-rending. The final pages of the book witnesses the events that led to the tragic end of Mahatma Gandhi. The plan of the slaughter of The 'Father of the Nation' by Nathuram Ghodse. Controversial for its portrayal of the British expatriates, the native rulers of India and members of India's first cabinet, it is a non-fiction book told in a casual style, similar to the authors' previous Is Paris Burning? and O Jerusalem!. Collins and Lapierre also wrote a book about their research with respect to Mountbatten, titled Mountbatten and the Partition of India. This book contains interviews with Mountbatten, and a selection of papers that were in his possession. First of all, this book explains the 20th century history of India and Pakistan. It states the the foundation of two states which even today have tension. If this is your famous historical fact, I think you should really learn history. The conflict between Hindus and Muslims and both sides killing each other are based not only religious but social and economic reasons. Today, in India there is a Muslim minority living in peace with Hindus except Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashmir_conflict) I was expecting you to give some examples of religious conflicts only. Let me give you some examples from history of Christianity: For instance, what about Crusades? Have you ever heard about them? Oh come on, I know you love them. I posted many times here in 1099 AD, during the First Crusade, Crusaders killed everybody in Jerusalem, women, children, Muslim, Jew, Christian every body, even cats and dogs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Jerusalem_(1099) Massacre[edit] in Jerusalem Muslims[edit] Many Muslims sought shelter in the Al-Aqsa Mosque, the Dome of the Rock, and the Temple Mount area generally. According to the Gesta Francorum, speaking only of the Temple Mount area, "...[our men] were killing and slaying even to the Temple of Solomon, where the slaughter was so great that our men waded in blood up to their ankles..." According to Raymond of Aguilers, also writing solely of the Temple Mount area, " in the Temple and porch of Solomon men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins." However, this imagery should not be taken literally; it was taken directly from biblical passage Revelation 14:20.[12] Writing about the Temple Mount area alone Fulcher of Chartres, who was not an eyewitness to the Jerusalem siege because he had stayed with Baldwin in Edessa at the time, says: "In this temple 10,000 were killed. Indeed, if you had been there you would have seen our feet coloured to our ankles with the blood of the slain. But what more shall I relate? None of them were left alive; neither women nor children were spared".[13] The eyewitness Gesta Francorum states that some people were spared. Its anonymous author wrote, "When the pagans had been overcome, our men seized great numbers, both men and women, either killing them or keeping them captive, as they wished."[14] Later the same source writes, "[Our leaders] also ordered all the Saracen dead to be cast outside because of the great stench, since the whole city was filled with their corpses; and so the living Saracens dragged the dead before the exits of the gates and arranged them in heaps, as if they were houses. No one ever saw or heard of such slaughter of pagan people, for funeral pyres were formed from them like pyramids, and no one knows their number except God alone. But Raymond caused the Emir and the others who were with him to be conducted to Ascalon, whole and unhurt."[15] Another eyewitness source, Raymond of Aguilers, reports that some Muslims survived. After recounting the slaughter on the Temple Mount he reports of some who "took refuge in the Tower of David, and, petitioning Count Raymond for protection, surrendered the Tower into his hands." [16] These Muslims left with the Fatimid governor for Ascalon.[17] A version of this tradition is also known to the later Muslim historian Ibn al-Athir (10, 193–95), who recounts that after the city was taken and pillaged: "A band of Muslims barricaded themselves into the Oratory of David (Mihrab Dawud) and fought on for several days. They were granted their lives in return for surrendering. The Franks honoured their word, and the group left by night for Ascalon."[18] One Cairo Geniza letter also refers to some Jewish residents who left with the Fatimid governor.[19] Tancred claimed the Temple quarter for himself and offered protection to some of the Muslims there, but he was unable to prevent their deaths at the hands of his fellow Crusaders. Although the Crusaders killed many of the Muslim and Jewish residents, eyewitness accounts (Gesta Francorum, Raymond of Aguilers, and the Cairo Geniza documents) demonstrate that some Muslim and Jewish residents were allowed to live, as long as they left Jerusalem.[20] Did you ever hear in your life about the Thirty Years' Wars? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty_years_war) The Thirty Years' War (1618–1648) was a series of wars principally fought in Central Europe, involving most of the countries of Europe.[10] It was one of the longest and most destructive conflicts in European history, and one of the longest continuous wars in modern history. Initially, religion was a motivation for war as Protestant and Catholic states battled it out even though they all were inside the Holy Roman Empire. Changing the relative balance of power within the Empire was at issue. Gradually, it developed into a more general conflict involving most of the great powers of Europe.[11] In this general phase the war became less specifically religious and more a continuation of the Bourbon–Habsburg rivalry for European political pre-eminence, leading in turn to further warfare between France and the Habsburg powers.[12] The Catholics and Protestants killed each other for Thirty Years. How nice isn't it? In the name of religion and Jesus Christ. Let us look the humanity of Belgians. They are Christians, right? Oh, no, not in Middle Age. Just between 1885 - 1908, just 128 to 105 years ago from today, under Belgian King Leopold II, Congo Free State in Africa. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo#Belgian_colonization) The Congo Free State was a corporate state privately controlled by Leopold II of Belgium through the Association Internationale African, a non-governmental organization. Leopold was the sole shareholder and chairman. The state included the entire area of the present Democratic Republic of the Congo. Under Leopold II's administration, the Congo Free State became the site of one of the most infamous international scandals of the turn of the twentieth century. The report of the British Consul Roger Casement led to the arrest and punishment of white officials who had been responsible for cold-blooded killings during a rubber-collecting expedition in 1903, including one Belgian national for causing the shooting of at least 122 Congolese natives. Estimates of the total death toll vary considerably. In the absence of a census, the first was made in 1924, it is even more difficult to quantify the population loss of the period. Roger Casement's famous 1904 report estimated ten million people. According to Casement's report, indiscriminate "war", starvation, reduction of births and tropical diseases caused the country's depopulation.[3] The European and U.S. press agencies exposed the conditions in the Congo Free State to the public in 1900. By 1908 public and diplomatic pressure led Leopold II to annex the Congo as the Belgian Congo colony. Do you want to see what did these Christian Belgians do to children and wives of fathers and husbands who could not collect enough rubber? They just cut one hand off! How compassionate isn't it? Congolese children and wives whose fathers/husbands failed to meet rubber-collection quotas often had their hands cut off. 3bob, First learn history. Second learn how Christians distributed their love to other people. Then, come and talk about Muslims and Islam. NOW, GO AWAY!

It does not change the result. Beginner, intermediate or advanced, they will only receive harm.

Negative. You will give harm to practitioners with such little sleep.

2 hours of sleep does not make any sense. How many days does this retreat continue? I do not speak Chinese. I do not know whether Vitalii's school is genuine or not. However, I clearly see that this program is negative. It is not sustainable. There will be nothing positive out of this program.

I am still waiting for 3bob's answer, i.e. the historical facts about Muslim people who use Islam for corrupted purposes.

Ok, let us start with the main course. I see there is a misunderstanding of my words, partly due to my lack of explanation, partly due to cultural differences. I tried to say that your sentence about net of jewels explain the realms that been created God Almighty, however it does not form a model for the Divine Realms (Realms that have become one with God) and God Almighty. I tried to point out the difference between Creator and Created. Thus, I did not mean anything as "Not Created" or "Not God" I smile writing these lines as your claim does not fit me at all. About your question Satan, please be informed that it was not created as Satan. It had been the highest Archangel, Ramza. It failed about its test about Nafs, it was cursed and it became Satan. You mentioned a point about to decide about an act whether it is evil or not. The procedure is rather simple but not the process. "Where does this act stand in reference to Holy Quran?" It is easy to say but not so easy to apply. If it is not explicitly mentioned in Holy Quran, could we find it in Sunnah, the acts of Prophet Muhammad? If not, then we have to make a new decision in the light of Holy Quran, Sunnah, our minds, our hearts and our conscience. You have an interesting notion of man's evolution from caves to pubs. I could not understand how did you locate the "organized religion" in that template, but I am afraid you are referring to Christianity by organized religion. I mentioned in other threads, but let me repeat once more, the Monasticism applied in Christendom is not, repeat, is not order of God Almighty. Thus, all the churchs including Vatican as economic, politic, social and financial institutions are inventions of mankind.

You summarized the age of computers very well. Allow me to contribute from the bestseller novel of "Shibumi" (not exact words since I read in my native language) "The computers make a foolish person to look like clever"

Sorry. I just forgot to answer this post. I apologize. Your usage of English is excellent and you summarized it very well. I was not offended by the word "old" at all. Please forgive my English as it is not my native language.

Marblehead, I am happy to meet you. You are too good to be an Atheist any way. Interestingly, among the Atheists I know, some of them are like you, very good persons. Compared to "religious" guys like RongzomFan or Taliban, they are at least open to discuss and learn.

As far as I know, Jesus Christ and Babaji has no relation. The claim of Paramhansa Yogananda that they are related is not correct.

Then your Terma has been written by humans which shows that it is corrupted 100% according to your criteria.

Who wrote Terma? The Bon religion demons?

Only twice? Tens of thousand times

The end of mankind will happen with several disasters following each other, each will be destructive in a scale that has not been observed by mankind. Not just one disaster.

It means you should open your heart to be connected to God Almighty.

When that day comes, that picture will be very very innocent.

I googled "Contradictions in Buddhism" Look what I found. Are they correct? http://www.faithdefenders.com/articles/worldreligions/Buddhism_Unmasked.html The Buddha Buddhism is supposedly built upon the teachings and example of a Hindu guru who was called the “Buddha,” i.e. Enlightened One. The problem we face is that this guru did not write down any of his teachings. Neither did any of his early disciples. A few manuscripts appear four to five hundred years after his death! But most of the manuscripts do not appear until nearly 1,000 years after his death. This gives plenty of time for legends and myths to arise that falsify the life and teachings of the guru. This problem is further complicated by the development of two contradictory literary traditions: Pali and Sanskrit. These divergent literary traditions produced hundreds of Buddhist sects that disagree with each other on many major points. No Primary Sources Because the lack of primary source materials for the history of Buddhism, modern scholars seriously doubt the reliability of the traditional legends about the Buddha. As a matter of fact, if he were alive today he would not recognize the religion that bears his name! Since Buddhists themselves disagree on the “facts” of the life and teachings of their guru, there is more than adequate reason to cast doubt on the entire history of the “Buddha.”

Holy Quran is not corrupted. Your Buddhist texts? They are all man made, according to your definition, they are all corrupted.

Noone can be as great as you in the service of Satan.

You lied many times like this. This is your thread. Prove the Creator is debunked.

Did you show any proof to debunk Creator ?

I admit Satanists like you do not love me at all.