Nungali

I criticize humanity then so ? Gonna nail me up or what ? I note the thread including first post got plenty of likes ... so unless all those people see it as an attack on you and modern Jews and support that ... they dont see like you do . I was talking ancient history , if you want to get modern about it ... meet me in current affairs forum .

And thus ^ is exactly what you did before in your arguments with others here , regardless of the subjects . Time for a holiday .

Regardless , you have done it . You have plastered all over this thread that I wrote posts to attack Jews .

Oh did I now ? .

No, this thread is supposedly about you inviting questions , again YOU have made it into attacking Jews

Of course ... it doesnt

" " This thread is about attacking Jews and Judaism as the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise. "

you posted it quoting yourself 2 hrs ago from 4 hrs ago ! " This thread is about attacking Jews and Judaism as the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise. "

Oh ... I should mention this before I go , I nearly missed it . This is the second such time you cited a different 'sinister' claim to the one I first mentioned . I'm having none of the above as that was your claim and words not mine . Anyone that read that thread knows I said such massaging and rewriting of history is throughout ALL people's history . YOU where the one that started inserting sinister and specific 'attacks on Jews' . I was doing an historical , non faith based , non biblical 'history' accounts of what was observed back then .... bought to light by more and more people releasing cuneiform translations that are now being done becasue more and more people are learning how to do that . I know you feel affronted by this .. but so what ? Deal with it Daniel ! I have had to deal with re educating myself about the real history of my own culture and country .... and we tried to genocide the natives ! And yes, many here tried to raise their voices and 'academic opinion ' against it . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_history_wars Now, we can do the same thing with Christianity , with Islam and even with the Persian Zoroastrian redaction (its just that its contribution has been masked by 90% deliberate text reduction) . I am sure there are religious belief people out there that will defend 'historical' Christianity and Islam as well . Whatofit ? You gonna censor me ? put me on a gibbet ? of yeah ? ..... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Hallaj

Thank you for answering . No more questions - over and out .

it was not what you wrote ... you already cut and pasted that as your ' proof' , now you are changing it That didnt answer the question either So accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister ? yes or no ? ... That would make it a LOT simpler than this above 'answer ' .

" So accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister ? yes or no ? " But I didnt ask you if choosing sinister words was a sinister choice ... did I ? Ohhhh Daniel ! I asked you " So accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister ? yes or no ? " This guy just cant help himself ... it amazing !

I am thanking you for 'saving screen space and unnecessary scrolling ' .

maybe this will help :

okay So accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister ?

Nope more diversion still not answering the question all you did was cycle back to where you didnt answer it before and add some more top spin . a simple yes or no will do So, accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister ? you keep referring back to other woprds that are not 'sinister ' Its SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO simple daniel So accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister ? yes or no ?

Its time for a joke ; Ask me anything ! " What is the capitol of Kazakhstan ? " _ " Dunno . " " Why do people believe in God ?" - 'Who cares ' ? " Why did you say we can ask you anything ?" - 'Well, I actually never said that in the first place ." ' Whats with all thes ebullshit answers ? - 'Well ... I said you could ASK , me anything ... i never siad I would answer with knoeldge, hoinestlky or even give an answer at all . " " Then why set this up in the first place ??? ! " " ...

Are you now or have you ever been accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' ?

Still does not answer the question . This time its a 'hat in hand ' attempt at diversion .. that wont work either .

So after nutting that one out you now go back to it and still refuse to answer ... thatmust be a 'check'

or did you mean 'where you answered it' wrongly by false quoting , then admitted it by 'finding' the right quote and then putting it up and then refusing to answer a question directly about what you DID say when you put up the right post ? So the first wrong citation ( which you diverted from and glossed over being wrong about ) or the one you now admit was relevant but are still refusing to answer a simple question on ? with more thinly veiled insults to suggest I cant comprehend what is happening here . lets see ' trying to sow seeds of self doubt ' , now I believe that is on the list for a particular type of personality that wa sonce exposed here .,.... ummm by Taomeow perhaps ?

No need , just simply answer this below ; So accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister ?

still refuse to answer the simple question eh ? more red herrings ? You better go fishing before you run out .,

Nope Its a direct editing of my posts and then 'quoting them ' to try and desperately protect Daniel for being wrong 'once in his life ' answer the question ! .