Nungali

Ahh, but you see, he was talking about the male penis . I have found the male penis excessive ( excessive : more than is necessary, normal, or desirable) . Now, that other type of penis ..... nah, they are not excessive at all they are necessary, normal and desirable. Whereas the female clitoris ....... actually .... what is a female clitoris ?

Well, you never cited any or refereed to any ... and when asked you will ignore the question and continue to fill the site up with more of your garbage . Are you sure it is me that is trolling ? Are you sure its me that is contributing to the toxicity that is spreading through the modern world, creating intelligence loss ? No . But I am not going to stop . And I will continue pointing out any person who posts such rubbish here . Bullshit ! You cant back up anything you say, just give unreferenced youtube addresses - even without a title ! No. I will remain on your case until you can back up what you say is from the 'founders of physics' * with citations or reference . * I bet you dont even know who the 'founders of physics' where . It seems you think I am writing this to offend you . No, I am attacking the 'position' you are presenting here ( the reason I dont even say 'your opinion' is you cant even admit to that and are making all sorts of wide and wild claims that this rubbish is the work of famous physicists ) .

Not only that, have you noted the cycle operating ? here he is back where he was at the beginning of his posting history . After the first initial start he was like that, but then somehow all of a sudden he became the authorative mystic speaking on Magick and Crowley, then he said that was crap , then he forgave God , then he posted how magick did this and that , then how it doesnt work , then how he was an initiate of it with a degree , then gave that up, then became resolved, moved to a more peaceful position .... now he is back at the start again cursing God . One wonders how many times the poor guy has been doing these cycles ?

Wait ! Hold on.... you are saying I cant .... sit at time ? I cant touch time ? WOW Thank god for that post ..... I thought I WAS touching time ???? <looks down> OH ... I see , I am actually 'touching myself' . - a lot of that going around lately .

Toes dont wiggle, thats false science ... toes actually exist inside out of each other . (see I can do it too )

And for Gd's sake, learn some English, proper sentence structure and syntax ! Thats another part of the syndrome .... dude has secret advanced knowledge ... cant string a sentence together properly in his own language .

.. and this is what happens people when you cater to them , and I also mean off line as well . By supporting these types of people in listening, nodding and (if you are dumb enough yourself ) asking them for further advice about practice ( MY GOD ! ) it just supports and increases the syndrome .

Ummmm ... those quotes where from the world's greatest physicists . Here is a quote from you ; " The diseased condition of menstruation appears in some men as well as in some women. " I dont care how many mind numbing idiot youtubes you try to link to ... I won't be watching them. Load of crap Piss off . or have the guts to answer a simple question put to you about what you wrote . Its a very simple challenge .... cough up or it proves what you are writing is absolute crapola . And, like most people withyour syndrome .... you cant follow a conversation ; get asked a question and sprout a whole lot of unrealted shit .... how about answering the question ? No, you guys dont work like that do you , Hopelessly entangled .

Oh right .... I was thinking of Hilton Hotel MA.

Dont forget - we are in 'The Rabbit Hole' ; And if you go chasing rabbits And you know you're going to fall Tell 'em a hookah-smoking caterpillar Has given you the call Call Alice When she was just small When the men on the chessboard Get up and tell you where to go And you've just had some kind of mushroom And your mind is moving low Go ask Alice I think she'll know When logic and proportion Have fallen sloppy dead And the White Knight is talking backwards And the Red Queen's off with her head Remember what the dormouse said

I think I stayed at the Hilton Hotema once ?

It sorta seems the converse of some other site ..... ? No wait ... not converse ..... adverse ! thats the word . .

Nope . Thats all wrong, you know nothing about science . Way beyond YOUR concept of 'fake space time ' IS a concept of the eather in science ; ' Quintessence ' The name comes from quinta essentia (fifth element). So called in Latin starting from the Middle Ages, this was the (first) element added by Aristotle to the other four ancient classical elements because he thought it was the essence of the celestial world. Aristotle posited to be a pure, fine, and primigenial element. Later scholars identified this element with aether. Similarly, modern quintessence would be the fifth known "dynamical, time-dependent, and spatially inhomogeneous" contribution to the overall mass–energy content of the universe. Of course, the other four components are not the ancient Greek classical elements, but rather "baryons, neutrinos, dark matter, [and] radiation." Although neutrinos are sometimes considered radiation, the term "radiation" in this context is only used to refer to massless photons. Spatial curvature of the cosmos (which has not been detected) is excluded because it is non-dynamical and homogeneous; the cosmological constant would not be considered a fifth component in this sense, because it is non-dynamical, homogeneous, and time-independent " They think light has mass " yet " Light is composed of photons, so we could ask if the photon has mass. The answer is then definitely "no": the photon is a massless particle. According to theory it has energy and momentum but no mass, and this is confirmed by experiment to within strict limits." AND NOTE ; " The short answer is "no", but it is a qualified "no" because there are odd ways of interpreting the question which could justify the answer "yes". Sometimes people like to say that the photon does have mass because a photon has energy E = hf where h is Planck's constant and f is the frequency of the photon. Energy, they say, is equivalent to mass according to Einstein's famous formula E = mc2. They also say that a photon has momentum, and momentum p is related to mass m by p = mv. What they are talking about is "relativistic mass", an old concept that can cause confusion . Relativistic mass is a measure of the energy E of a particle, which changes with velocity. By convention, relativistic mass is not usually called the mass of a particle in contemporary physics so, at least semantically, it is wrong to say the photon has mass in this way. But you can say that the photon has relativistic mass if you really want to. In modern terminology the mass of an object is its invariant mass, which is zero for a photon. Dude ! read up on some science and kick the bullshit youtube 'research' habit . You could ruin your brain doing that ... ohhh ... yeah . Might be too late . I am serious people, take heed . MY years long predictions about that here on DBs are about to be revealed in world wide mass media ... and its worse than we think ! ( it should all be out by the end of next month ) .

Anything will make sense to you when you redefine any real science as fake and any 'science' you come up with as 'true' in retrospect with the aim of justifying your ego ... I mean 'ideas' .

Where are these " newly opened hidden temples " ? I am interested as I study archaeology .

Did you know if you walk around a tree with your hand on it, all the way around as you touch it , back to the place you started ..... that tree will die ? Now this one I can assert is true . The same thing if I do it to you ; touch you, hold my finger on you and draw a circle around you .... you will die too ..... eventually .

True story ... from when I worked in labour ward . ( Okay , he must have been 'nervous' or .... ? ) Expectant father / husband talking to his wife's doctor , some nurses and myself are within hearing : " ... okay, and doctor ...... ummmmm .... how long after childbirth do I have to wait before resuming normal sexual relations ?" The female nurse's winced , as he was yet to ask the doctor a relevant question . I am ..... And the Doc , a good one , known (amongst staff ) for having a very dry wit responded , in a very official and doctor like voice ; " It is customary to wait , at least , until after the placenta has been delivered . "

I regret to inform you 'helpfuldemon' that you have been knocked off your perch . It could not last forever , as you know, but you ae no longer Daobums number 1 crazy person / senseless and confused post writer . It was a long reign ..... I hope you find peace in your retirement . Now, introducing our new contender ..... in the left corner (of the asylum) .... a big round of applause please , for ....

Maybe thats what happened to our 'author' here when he was in the womb ? - and he ended up with a few dents in his head . .

" slow your heart rate down until it stops then you can astral travel. " This is great !

" Sex: No masturbation or sex ever. Only during childbirth. ' Woman in labour , giving birth ; " Honey , I know you have your practices , but sitting in the corner wanking yourself while I am birthing your son, isnt really helping ! "

... biographies do have a habit of ending in tragedy .

Oh wait ..... I just got it

What is an OTO biography ?