Nungali

No . I talk to myself but here I write for others to read . 'We' ? I am of no mind about it . I am in my way at this moment , I am in my place where I am ( and live here daily ) . I found it decades ago and before that I have been awake since 1965 . The way at this moment moves towards dinner time . I shall practice my cooking . ... and try to be single pointed conscious in doing it .

That sounded rather ......... ominous .

'' Ahhhhh ..... that's 'better' ? ''

Its almost as if the Egyptians believed nothing existed by itself but in relation to everything else .

You got rogered ?

The beir or 'lion bed ' . What is the significance of the lion here ? [ I have one on my small back verandah / landing ; I had a statue of Anubis with hands extended over a mummy lying on a bier with a big lions head on one end . It got moved around ( after sitting on the table on my GFs side of the bed - she was working as a mortician then ) the mummy was a separate piece and ended up ??? The rest ended up outside near the bench I sit on to have my morning coffee fix . Out in the garden I saw a bush turkey come in and start digging up a new plant , I hoiked a stick at it , hit a tree, bounced off , got Anubis, knocked off an arm and one ear . So now this lion bier just sits there like a little table on the bench ]

And correct mental attitude for sword work

'Existence' ... by itself - 'pure existence' ... is a state . When you are in that 'certain state ' , there is nothing else . When you are not in that state , you might link purpose to it . But even more so , pure existence , beyond and without 'you' has no purpose . It is something that 'is' which might be all we can say about it . And its not conceptualized by the mind ... which might be a challenge to one that is very 'mental' ... even to the extent they feel they can 'mentalise the cosmos ' so much that they refer to fellow humans as something 'other' than them in their own speaking mental perspective . An obvious example of what ? You just made your own 'if' postulation and then based a premise on your if and then gave an example of your premise . Which says nothing about nor counters the idea that Existence has no purpose . ..... and that too 'just happens ' ... without purpose . What you might be confused with is the resultant benefits we get from it . Some might say that is its purpose ... to benefit us .... to that, I say ......

Sure they do .... some of them ;

The act of observation causing the Universe to behave in a different manner : .

Would you say the term 'fetish ' ( in anthropological sense ) would describe this ? A fetish is described as ; something to house a spirit or ancestor , something power like a charm or sacred object , something a special function ; protection, healing , etc . The Imy-wt is said to predate the 1st dynasty ? I wondering if it is one of those early 'throwbacks ' to some of the African traditions that entered the Nile Valley ( as the ank symbol might be ? ) ( the name fetish was given to the magical objects encountered in west Africa - Portugese > ' fetico ' > 'charm / magic ' . . . originally ' made for / as art ' . )

Someone who's cultivated is knowledgeable or at least familiar with the arts, current events, history. He or she probably has traveled widely, or at least has read about other people and places. In other words, a cultivated person is a citizen of the world.

I have seen them occasionally and wondered what they were ? I assumed a totem or ' standard ' of a Nome or God .

The 'object' 2nd from the right ( to the left of the far right figure ... a skin and ... ? ) looks interesting . Looks like a nome 'totem' ?

'Beingness ' ... that has no existence ?

Shed light on any special place for you ? Thats up to you; walk around, explore, see what you are drawn to or it just might happen by itself ; you 'end up there' or are led there . To shed more light on this I would refer back to the things I mentioned and the links I made , read up on it and learn more about it . Of course you are not . I study anthropology ; of all peoples, in all places and over all time periods , this is a very common phenomena in that regard and constitutes a human reality , in context . this most recent 'scientific materialist ' outlook that denies such things is VERY recent , comparatively . I have had my own and similar expertness Its common . Look at the things I pointed you towards . No going back and be patient .

Just think : God can lead you into temptation , you get tempted , you give in to the temptation and ...... well, commit a 'sin' , I suppose and then die and go to hell for an eternity ! Yikes ! But if you say your prayers and ask nicely , '' lead me not into temptation'' God will be all ..... '' Ohhhhh , okay then .'' and not lead you into temptation and you will go to heaven for eternity . Yay ! I guess its sorta like when you have a friend that is an ex-alcoholic and you keep offering them a drink , leaving booze bottles around , sneaking vodka into their drinking water .... stuff like that . .

hello and welcome . I am interested in this bit , maybe ...... depending on what you mean by it ; '' ... inner Goetia as a path of psychological and spiritual refinement ... '' '' ...

A venture into 'Neo - Hermetics' : Previously mentioned above , conversations with Brian . We ( a few daobums ) were discussing the 'mathematical formula of everything ' that had been posted . It was complex , I could not follow it , some here seemed able to . But I did recognize some symbols , constants , forces .... ' G ' stood out , one of the 'four fundamental forces of physics ' - gravity . G was on the left of the equal sign with other symbols and ideas and there were similar on the left , ie. 'after = , or ' the result is ' . I said G should not be on the left, it should be on the right ...'as a result of ' . Brian said 'Interesting ' . What I meant by that is , it should conform ( or confirm ) my 3 ; 4 theory ie. three fundamental 'things' ( 'forces' , ingredients , etc ) in an 'ideal dimension' ( not 'real ' , or at least observable or obvious ) produce a 4th effect in a 'real' dimension . I go through it in detail in my PP in an article on numbers . This overall pattern is attested in many traditions, including on The Tree of Life and Ch 42 TTC . ( see my article for further examples ) . This suggests that the four fundamental forces didnt just .... 'be' , all at once , or were implied , but that 1,2 and 3 'engendered' all things . So with the 4 fundamental forces : the weak and strong force within the atom ( let's say , 'in the microcosm' ) , the electro-magnetic forces ( now having more observable effect in our world ... the 'middlecosm ' ? ) producing the fourth fundamental force , gravity . And I previously mentioned I thought that is why the Unifeld Field theory could not be developed , they cant 'fit gravity into it ' . I postulated that is because it is a result or product of the other three .... not the idea of the first four forces just being there together . As one hopes with 'Neo- Hermetics ' some agreement between 'ancient sciences' and 'modern science' might be found ... and it is , so many times if one looks at things the right way . In this regard , one of the new theories about gravity is interesting , it says it is an emanation from forces in the microcosm ! I would say the forces that bind atoms together are in the microcosm . And the effect is in the macrocosm ... gravity's effect certainly is . '' A fresh look at gravity challenges long-held assumptions about one of nature’s most familiar yet puzzling forces. In a new study, two researchers argue that gravitational attraction is not a basic force at all, but an effect that emerges from deeper quantum processes tied to electromagnetism. If confirmed, the theory could help explain mysteries that have long resisted standard models — including the origins of dark matter and the energy accelerating the universe’s expansion. ...The work, published in Journal of Physics Communications, reimagines gravity not as a force stitched into the fabric of spacetime, but as something that arises from the quantum-level behavior of ordinary matter. * ... The idea builds on earlier efforts to rethink gravity as an emergent phenomenon — an effect that arises from more basic physical processes, rather than a force on its own ...'' https://www.advancedsciencenews.com/new-theory-suggests-gravity-is-not-a-fundamental-force/ . * and that occurs in those sub atomic forces . .

It seems 'something' ( the cats or not ) non allorgowhatchamaycallit is 'behind things ' ?

This is a good article on the same - it delves into the Platonic 'pre-realm' and talks about ' ... "The fundamental laws of physics cannot be contained within space and time, because they generate them.... '' https://phys.org/news/2025-10-mathematical-proof-debunks-idea-universe.html Oh yeah !

So thunk Zarathustra .

Certainly ..... a blow to the head can do it ! There are many examples of that . Acquired savant syndrome is a rare condition where an individual develops extraordinary new talents, such as those in music, art, or mathematics, after a brain injury, stroke, or other central nervous system event. This condition is distinct from congenital savant syndrome because it appears in previously neurotypical individuals who had no prior ability in the newfound area. It is believed to result from the right hemisphere of the brain compensating for damage to the left hemisphere https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savant_syndrome#Acquired_cases ' Amen' to that

'' Summary: New research from UBC Okanagan mathematically demonstrates that the universe cannot be simulated. Using Gödel’s incompleteness theorem, scientists found that reality requires “non-algorithmic understanding,” something no computation can replicate. This discovery challenges the simulation hypothesis and reveals that the universe’s foundations exist beyond any algorithmic system. '' I had an interesting converse with AI about it ( which should be exhibiting 'algorithmic understanding ' ) Me; ''Give me an example of non algorithmic understanding other than Godel's incompleteness theorem . '' AI ; '' Besides the mathematical example of Gödel statements, non-algorithmic understanding is often cited in everyday human experiences involving intuition, common sense, creativity, and subjective consciousness. These abilities involve holistic pattern recognition and interpretation that do not rely on a fixed set of logical rules. Intuition and Decision-Making Humans frequently make complex decisions rapidly and effectively without consciously following a strict sequence of logical steps or a complete set of data. Emergency Response: Experienced firefighters, paramedics, and police officers often rely on "gut feelings" to make split-second decisions that determine safety. This intuition is a rapid, subconscious processing of patterns from thousands of past experiences, a form of understanding that bypasses deliberate calculation. Medical Diagnosis: Experienced physicians may intuit the correct diagnosis for a patient even before all lab tests are complete, sensing the right path through subtle cues and pattern matching that are hard to articulate as a formal algorithm. Driving Safety: An experienced driver might instinctively brake or swerve before consciously registering every detail of a potential hazard (e.g., a ball rolling onto the road signaling a child might follow). Common Sense and Context Common sense involves an innate ability to judge a situation through instinct and general reason rather than explicit knowledge, something AI systems often struggle with. Understanding Nuance and Sarcasm: Humans effortlessly understand complex social cues, body language, sarcasm, and implicit meaning in conversations. An algorithm can follow rules of grammar, but grasping the full, subtle intent behind a statement involves a dynamic, contextual understanding that is not easily codified into an algorithm. Navigating Unforeseen Circumstances: A self-driving car (an algorithmic system) might make a dangerous maneuver if it lacks intuitive physics understanding or encounters a situation not in its training data (e.g., a mob attack ahead). A human driver would use common sense to turn around and find a new path. Creativity and Aesthetics The appreciation and creation of art, music, and profound ideas involve a type of understanding that seems to emerge from a holistic process, not a rigid algorithm. Aesthetic Judgment: Deciding why a piece of music is moving or a painting is beautiful is a subjective, non-algorithmic process. While some algorithms can generate art based on patterns, the human capacity to attribute deep meaning and beauty is not a simple calculation. Innovative Problem Solving: Major scientific or artistic breakthroughs often stem from a flash of insight or a "light bulb" moment, where intuition suggests an entirely new approach when logical, step-by-step methods have reached a wall. Subjective Experience (Qualia) The raw, subjective feeling of "what it is like" to have an experience—known as qualia in philosophy—cannot be reduced to mere algorithmic information processing. The Sensation of "Redness": One can describe the physics of light wavelengths, the biology of the eye, and the neural processing of the brain in an algorithmically precise way, but this physical information does not capture the actual subjective feeling of seeing the color red. This internal, private experience is considered a non-algorithmic truth of consciousness.