Nungali

Like this ; "Here boy .... come on .... come over here ! "

Maybe ? Or maybe 'you' have more abilities * than 'you' realise ? * 'extensions' , 'connections' , 'levels', etc . 'Negative', 'bad' or 'harmful' spirits claim such knowledge , but can be exposed ; the knowledge can be discovered to come from the persons forgotten past or attributed to the, sometimes amazing, powers of the 'unconscious'. 'Beneficial', 'good' or positive spirits cannot be exposed like that, they either dont make the claims or reveal things in a different way - they may also be 'higher parts' of yourself. Empirical tests have revealed the 'false claims and trickery' of the 'demons' , but I dont think the truth of the predictions of one's 'angel' or 'daemon' has been likewise proven ? I may have missed it though ; http://www.searchwithin.org/download/presence_spirits.pdf Stories are fun . I haven't read one that convinced me it was not some higher aspect of the person ..... perhaps via Circuit VIII ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eight-circuit_model_of_consciousness#8._The_psychoatomic_or_quantum_non-local_circuit_.28Overmind.29 Virtuous deed ? Mhe .... Just do what you know needs to be done .

No need to give up or to strain at it . Definitely the egg first ! Eggs were being laid long before the first chicken evolved .

We will just bury it somewhere and in the future . people brighter than us will know how to dispose of it.

firing nukes at the sun seems more about the end of mankind IMO

So do I, but that doesnt mean I want you you to shoot nukes at me . Yikes ! Here is a communication from Sun to Junko "Junko, please dont shoot me ! "

I am thinking about it carefully ! If this has nothing to do with the sun, how do you get the nuclear warheads there ?

JUnko ..... you forget what can happen on the way ' up ' Do you really want this to happen in our atmosphere again while carrying a nuclear payload.

Dont nuke the Sun ! For goodness sakes !

Yes, until they get so small, we give up ... and admit its just the energy of the turtle ... without any material turtle being present .

Quark is an Eskimo word for turtle.

But Egyptian dogs were not made with straw . That was another hardship .... forced to have dogs with no straw in them. When I was in the desert , I too longed for a cold cucumber. This could be the origin of the outback insult "get a cold cucumber up ya ! "

Like someone's speculation that they are the head of Judaism .... hmmmmm ? Hey ! Here is a novel idea .... how about looking at a surviving brick from ancient Egypt ? No.... the Torah is better evidence , Ooooo yeah !

Yes, but the slaves were not used to that they were like "Dude ! Where is the straw ! " Not many people realise that the building history of the ancient Egyptians followed a still easily recognisable progression. First the DID build with straw. Then, in the next period they built with wood. After that bricks. This has passed on down to us today in a more modern mythological form

If such things exist they should be able to be demonstarted. Show me the money ! A bit like the astral IMO - one doesnt get the exact picture, more of a 'representation of the facts' and a representation based on what the person already knew, thought or wants to be true , mixed up with their imagination. Also it appears that in this 'record' are the 'proofs' of all those things we cant prove otherwise that we want to exist ... handy that !

Maybe because what you call 'spirits' are actually 'projected' parts of yourself , that might explain why they know your thoughts ? Oh dear ..... you poor ******* . Sounds like a guilt trip ! Get rid of that ! and turn it into

HUH ? There is a proper use for an atomic bomb ?

Little mini-atoms . (or teenie baby turtles)

I think he means the G*g of the slaves.... the ones that built Joseph's grain storage bins outa mud bricks without straw. And that particular slave's G@d that got elevated above all the other slave G#ds before they had a one and only G%d that he then told them not to worship .

Yes - and this ^ is my answer . 'Soul' is a function of the imagination grounded in technology / artistic, creative expression that defines the distinct human difference.

anyway , back to the distinct human difference. I dont see it as bipedalism as that does not create the result of the differences we see - here I am talking about the distinct human ability to, not adapt the body over time to deal with an environmental change, but to develop a 'technology' to deal with it. Again I see it as a product of 'imagination' , and animals may heave imagination , but not the sort that leads to this technology. The way I see it is ; 'Man' has the ability to foresee many possible outcomes from one scenario so he designs a tool and carries it with him, for possible future uses , not what is just at hand at the moment. Then he learns, in application, about the tool and its developments, and adjusts it for more perceived future uses. This is especially so in the concept of a multi use tool ( eg a digging point at one end and stone 'blade' at the other. ) To me, this means a thought process projected into the future with a type of mind map / flow diagram. We imagine possible scenarios in our imagination and develop possible multiple strategies to enact depending on what occurs ... or begins to unfold. And I see an inbuilt desire to see , at least some of, these ideas expressed and 'grounded' in the material world (outside of their mental construction). It may be via technology or an artistic or creative expression. This process leads to a type of 'psychological health'. This desire , first to mentally create and then to see imaginative concepts 'tried out' in reality, in the real world, to me, is the basic psychological nature of 'soul' . If 'soul; is not expressed it disrupts the psyche by either 'deadening' imagination / soul ( 'imaginative soul ' ) or, in some cases , demanding its expression by causing a change in perceived reality. Some say 'soul desire' can change material reality, I have not observed that, but I have seen it change perception of material reality. And there seems to be inbuilt 'laws' and 'dynamics ' about this. I may not have explained it well .... I am still nutting it out, but it all seems implied from several viewpoints , most noticeably that of Harpur's 'Diamonic Reality' theory " The mistake, he suggests, is to deny and repress these manifestations, since the repressed returns, pathologically and dangerously, if separated from a context of meaning and belief. Harpur suggests that a function of these daimonic forces may now be to undermine a deadening and narrow scientific orthodoxy and world-view - the 'single vision' which Blake so deplored. This sounds very radical but Harpur is the first to point out that it is not very new. By drawing on a philosophical tradition that flows down the centuries from the Neoplatonists, through the Romantics, and crucially in Bake, Yeats and Jung, he shows that there is an ancient history of understanding of this daimonic, Otherworld reality. Indeed, he goes back further still by embracing the folklore and tales of the Otherworld from across the Western tradition, and acknowledges that every culture, except perhaps our own, has seen its world as interpenetrated with another, shadowy, yet powerful reality, full of wonder, beauty and terror. The key to being alert to it lies in what Blake called the Imagination, and in not allowing the rational mind to shut out what it cannot readily comprehend or control. " http://www.harpur.org/PJCHdaimonicreality.htm & for related dynamics of this type of 'imagination' ; http://www.harpur.org/PJCHsecretfire.htm

... and leave my sandals with socks alone thanks