Gâday everyone. This is my current understanding of the first parts of the first chapter of the Dao De Jing.
The Dao just is and always has been and always will be. Itâs infinitely bigger and smaller than we can ever know or experience. It is beyond description by mere words. I equate it with whatever caused the Universe (or my limited concept and experience of the Universe) to come into being. I donât consider the Dao to be a deity as I believe that âIn the beginning, Man created godsâ. Nor do I believe the Dao is supernatural as I consider it is wholly natural.
As for the naming, I see Laozi saying something like, âBecause the Dao has always been, it has always âexistedâ. As it is the first thing to have existed and the only thing to have always existed, it has not required a name. A name is something you give to something else to describe and identify that something else. The Dao doesnât need to identify itself, even if it is capable of needing to indentify anything. It is only after it had started the process of creation that it required a name, and it was not the Dao that required it be given a name, but the Daoâs creation that required the Dao be given a name, and it was the Daoâs creation that named the Dao. Because it was the Daoâs creation that named it and because what exists now will not eternally exist, any name that is given to the Dao can not eternally exist and any name given to the Dao is not the Daoâs name but only a name given to the Dao.â
Of course, all of the above is only my opinion and understanding. Itâs great finding a site like this where so many other opinions and understandings can be found and mulled over.