maheosphet

If it is not relative then where is an objective means?

If you consider destination only in a conventional sense, then you miss the gest.

There is a going, yet the destination may not be known, clearly defined or properly considered. "A good traveler has no fixed plans, and is not intent on arriving." - Lao Tzu Here is destination, a place to arrive. Now is a destination, in ever presence, always there even if unseen.

Hold open the third eye every waking second. When it becomes like second nature, practice with heart in nature, all the while third eye awake.

The void is child's play compared to chaos.

It seems like there could be a going without a you to do the going? If there can be a coming and/or going with and/or without you then both are true and false, and the answer is relative to each perspective. From the perspective of self, one might see a mountain to summit, a hurdle to conquer, a prize to attain, a cake at the end of the maze. Yet it is along the way that all of these ideals vanish, only to reappear in a new way. This vanishing is the void which cleans the slate, presenting a fresh perspective in pure observation. This void seemingly empty has directions to travel which were previously unknown, unfathomable in 3-dimensions, being a line of the fourth. A fractal like shrinking and expanding. Space isn't empty, it only appears so.

I don't see where you get that implication. To me Destination implies a place to go.

Could enlightenment be both is and isn't a destination?

The combining happens once it is ready to happen and not before.

The story of the painting Sorta of reminds me of the Tibetan Sand Mandala.

Maybe you would be best suited to find a teacher to teach it to you.

Mind, in English is equivalent to the brain, and disconnected from emotional aspects such as heart. Heart is part of the mind and without intelligence or thinking in the broader scope.

I'm particularly referring to this:

How is complicated, it requires activated unnattached energy centers in simultaneous awareness. Each center needs freedom, and all have to be useable at the same time. So you begin working with each individually, and freeing it individually, then activating or juggling them together and moving them together, then combining.

Here it begins: http://www.amazon.com/Taoist-Yoga-Immortality-Charles-Luk/dp/0877280673

The lid is new to me, will you elaborate? Personally I continually stoke the fire, so to speak, or it's hot enough that water doesn't put it out, perhaps fire is dominant?

Fire an water are both found in the functional channel, or the front channel, the fire is held below the water to create a steam that evaporates as spirit energy to accumulate at the seat of the soul. The combining happens when the LDT is filled with fire.

IS mindfulness internal awareness?

I agree with you, fire tends to rise, but it isn't "restricted" to rise.

That is possible, maybe we are all deluded and there is no immortality or level 4.

It's more of a functional/governor sort of deal. There is also this fire that lit within the eyes. Who, this guy?