Jonesboy

Throttle
  • Content count

    1,714
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by Jonesboy

  1. Why chase after thoughts, which are superficial ripples of present awareness? Rather look directly into the naked, empty nature of thoughts; then there is no duality, no observer, and nothing observed. Simply rest in this transparent, nondual present awareness. Make yourself at home in the natural state of pure presence, just being, not doing anything in particular. Present awareness is empty, open, and luminous; not a concrete substance, yet not nothing. Empty, yet it is perfectly cognizant, lucid, aware. As if magically, not by causing it to be aware, but innately aware, awareness continuously functions. These two sides of present awareness or Rigpa ā€” its emptiness and its cognizance (lucidity) ā€” are inseparable. Emptiness and luminosity (knowing) are inseparable. They are formless, as if nothing whatsoever, ungraspable, unborn, undying; yet spacious, vivid, buoyant. Nothing whatsoever, yet Emaho!, everything is magically experienced. Simply recognize this. Look into the magical mirror of mind and appreciate this infinite magical display. With constant, vigilant mindfulness, sustain this recognition of empty, open, brilliant awareness. Cultivate nothing else. There is nothing else to do, or to undo. Let it remain naturally. Donā€™t spoil it by manipulating, by controlling, by tampering with it, and worrying about whether you are right or wrong, or having a good meditation or a bad meditation. Leave it as it is, and rest your weary heart and mind. .... Jamgƶn KongtrĆ¼l Lodrƶ ThayĆ© (1813ā€“1899), the first Jamgon Rinpoche, was a founder of the RimĆ© movement of Tibetan Buddhism and author of more than one hundred books. http://freddieyam.com/gen2/p/jamgon-kongtrul.html Rigpa is a being not a doing or an observing.
  2. I always felt that compassion as taught was used to open the heart chakra. The heart chakra being the chakra that is needed to perceive/feel energy.
  3. Questions..

    Only as a means of residing in the energy so that you can integrate/ let them go. http://community.livingunbound.net/index.php?/topic/472-working-with-emotions/#comment-3445 Getting lost in them or reliving them does no good.
  4. I was saying the opposite. Rigpa is not observing it is being. Thanks for helping me prove my point. Again when one realizes the Natural State you are the flow. From the flow is which all "things " come from and reside back into. Going back to lucid dreaming, it teaches us that our reality is self arising. Rigpa is that residing during our daily life. Rigpa is the ground, ones primordial state is before seperation and observing. You are that which all things arise from and reside back into
  5. The waves are your attachments. When one is one with the ocean it is smooth, calm and flows where it needs to. CHAPTER 8 The greatest good is like water. Water gives life to the Ten Thousand Things, but does not strive. Because it does not strive, it flows in places without preference, depending on the flow and so is like the Dao. In dwelling, be close to the land. In meditation, go deep into the heart. In dealing with others, be gentle and kind. In speech, be straight and truthful. In ruling, be just and honest. In business, be honest and competent. In action, be careful of the timing. Be forever these things and life will never burden you with troubles. Again from TTC
  6. Yes all things are self arising. Is that not the lesson you are to learn from lucid dreaming? I didn't write the statement but I believe "it" is being used as a description to help. Like using the term Dao.
  7. Yes I understand that. First everyone thinks they are the waves but in truth we are the ocean. One does not observe oneself as the ocean, they are the ocean.
  8. You lost me. Point two about psychology? Please show me were I am cherry picking? I believe I have shared reference after reference validating what I have said. Do you have any Norbu quotes you would like to share that contradicts what I have been saying?
  9. Now you are just being difficult. Neurophysiology doesn't explain shaktipat or a whole host of spiritual aspects. Does it explain oneness or the void or the jhanas or emptiness? Nope not at all. With regard to Ramana, states of being are all the same. Ramana Maharshi on Samadhi Question : What is samadhi? Ramana Maharshi : The state in which the unbroken experience of existence-consciousness is attained by the still mind, alone is samadhi. That still mind which is adorned with the attainment of the limitless supreme Self, alone is the reality of God. Question : May I have a clear idea of the difference between savikalpa and nirvikalpa? Ramana Maharshi : Holding on to the supreme state is samadhi. When it is with effort due to mental disturbances, it is savikalpa. When these disturbances are absent, it is nirvikalpa. Remaining permanently in the primal state without effort is sahaja. A still mind without disturbances and residing in that is Sahaja Samadhi. Which is my attempt to help you understand Rigpa. Unless you think Sahaja Samadhi is a higher state of being than Rigpa?
  10. Experience. If you read my earlier post that quoted Ramana you would see that he agrees with me. He is not very New Age either;)
  11. I completely understood what you meant. I would agree that to experience Rigpa or non attachment one has to learn to relax, let go aka reside. All the best to you, Tom
  12. This may help, From the Tao Te Ching CHAPTER 4 The Dao is forever like an unfathomable empty space. If used, it can never be used up. It is the source of the Ten Thousand Things. Look with your heart, see its form in the glare, be at one with the dust of the Earth, simplify your nature. For it is ever present, hidden in the depths of the myriad things. I don't know from whence it came, but it is great.
  13. Do you think that is the end all be all? Just observing thoughts without attachment. Do you really believe that is the highest state of being aka Rigpa? You can't reach samadhi while grasping or attaching to things. Eventually one moves beyond observing. Silence fills ones mind, the energy/thoughts flow through without grasping but they are you, as in the flow. It is a being not an observing. Eventually you are the clouds and the sky and the birds as them, not observing them. Emptiness with reference to thoughts is that all thoughts are energy. All things are energy and like clouds they seem to have form but in truth they are empty. The more we grasp, believe in our thoughts/ give them form the more suffering we experience. So emptiness of thoughts is realizing that thoughts are just energy, empty expect for what we grasp at. As one progresses one is able to experience all things as oneness and the emptiness nature of things. Aka void=form and form=void. It is a state of being not observing. All the best,
  14. Did not Wells mention Yoga? Was not my comments about the Witness not being our Natural State a direct response to his comments? If there are higher states of being as mentioned by Ramana then again the Witness is not our Natural State. No I am in no way a student of Jax. Anytime someone explains emptiness as watching thoughts come and go and how one can then observe the emptiness of the mind as an explanation of emptiness. I say run because they haven't experienced emptiness and therefore I doubt he has experienced Rigpa. All the best, Tom
  15. The yogic state as in the Witness? Like observing thoughts, feelings etc..? That is not Rigpa, seperation, observing is not the Natural State.
  16. [TTC Study] Chapter 56 of the Tao Teh Ching

    I like this translation from Shaman Flowing Hands: CHAPTER 56 Those who are enlightened, sit in silence. Those who think they know something, are forever talking. In silence and peace one can become enlightened. No one can teach someone else how to become enlightened, for it stems from within the heart. Be at one with Heaven and Earth and then you can become enlightened. He who has become enlightened, is unconcerned with friends, enemies, honour or disgrace, with wealth and titles. For he has become at one with the Dao. This is the highest state of man.
  17. Hatred.

    Emotions are energy. The good news is we can learn to integrate that energy and at the same time stop the mind stories that cause us pain. The following is a very powerful practice to help you learn how. This is really long but very good. LANDING OUT OF THE MENTAL PLANE The common denominator within any encounter of being upset is that we feel a level of discomfort. Instinctively, when confronted by an upset, we react through an expression of: Emotional feelings. By entertaining mental thoughts forms or stories. Through outwardly projected physical behavior. Whether we are aware of it or not, no matter what reactive approach we take when upset, by reacting to the upset we are attempting to sedate and control what we perceive is happening to us from our awareness. And, all sedation and control in the face of an upset is "the pushing of our shadow away from us", and consequently, a forced ascension of our awareness into the mental plane. The more we push away at the experience of "being upset", the more ungrounded we become. When we consciously observe an upsetting experience we real eyes there are three distinct aspects to it; a physical, mental, and emotional: The physical aspects are the circumstances or person/s that triggered the upset, and they are also the physical behaviors we are considering initiating as a consequence of whatever occurred. The mental aspect is the story we are telling ourselves about what happened, who did what, why it happened, and whose fault it was. The emotional aspect is how this upset is causing us to feel. The emotional aspect of any upset is accessible to us as both an uncomfortable feeling state, and emotion which we may call fear, anger, and/or grief, and as a corresponding physical sensation anchored within our body. Here are a set of instructions inviting you to consciously enter the grounding experience we are discussing: Remember the most recent occasion in which you felt upset. Notice how you use the mental plane as a corridor to recall the details of the incident; it obediently delivers your attention to the moment of the incident that initially triggered you. This is a useful application of the mental plane; using it as a means to fly your attention from one moment to another ā€“ whether this moment is currently unfolding or is already past. To enter a portal of upset you may also choose an upsetting experience from the past that has been festering within your thought forms right up to this present moment. You will find that your awareness of any past unintegrated event diminishes and seemingly completely disappears when you are busy and engaged within lifeā€™s demands, (which may be why you engage yourself so actively in so many "doings"). However, as you try to go to sleep at night, or as you awake in the morning, its resonance of disquiet dutifully returns. This type of upset is ripe for the picking. Whatever is upsetting you, whether something happening right now, or something from the past that is still nagging at you, is a way in. As you recall the upset of your choosing, instead of engaging in the mental aspect of the experience, or upon the physical actions you may be considering, place your attention fully on "the feeling" accompanying it. Take note of where this uncomfortable feeling is located as a physical sensation in your body. It does not matter what you call this uncomfortable feeling, whether it is fear, anger, and/or grief. Your only task is to feel it, and while feeling it, to simultaneously take note of where it is within your physical body. Whatever the uncomfortable emotional state is that accompanies the upset, it is also reflected as a physical sensation within your body. Your task is to place your attention within this physical sensation and to "cradle it". How? Momentarily bring to mind the image of The Madonna & Child: She is gently cradling the child in her arms; there is no movement within her posture, and no attempt to change or understand anything. Her only intention is to embrace the innocence contained within her arms. As you place your attention upon the uncomfortable feeling of this upset, cradle it in this manner; there is no physical movement required from your body, nor any mental participation in this practice other than using the mental body as a means to place and hold your attention fully within your physical body upon the sensational location of your emotional discomfort. As you cradle the uncomfortable feeling with your attention, keep your eyes open. Yes, open. As you place your attention upon the feeling within, do not close your eyes and escape from the outer physical reality of the moment you are currently engaging. The eyes you place upon this inner discomfort, the eyes that have the capacity to "feel", are the eyes of the heart. While the eyes of the heart attend to this inner feeling, allow the eyes of the physical body to rest in stillness, open, gently embracing the presence of the outer world. Notice how, as you place the eyes of the heart on the inner feeling, you instinctively want to close your eyes and disappear. This is the old habit of "mentally running away" which has often been disguised as "a spiritual practice". Do not leave, do not fly off, stay here. Now, if you choose to, place this piece of writing down, and enter this practice for a few minutes. Pay attention to the inner and outer experience it initiates. Here are the instructions for brief review: Remember the most recent occasion in which you felt upset. As you recall the upset, instead of engaging your attention in the mental aspect of the experience, or in the physical actions you are considering taking, place your attention fully on the accompanying feeling. take note of where this feeling is located as a physical sensation in your body. Cradle this feeling in that location. As you cradle the uncomfortable feeling with your attention, keep your eyes open. Simultaneously watch both the inner feeling and the outer world. Do not be concerned if you struggle to keep your attention hooked onto the feeling aspect of the recalled upset. Remember that the eyes of the heart are weak because we live upon a planet that does not consciously develop them or appreciate what they are able to show us. The eyes of the heart develop organically through our consistent use of them. When approaching an upset consciously in this manner, by placing our full attention on the felt-aspect of the experience, instead of escaping into mental activity or any physical behavior the mental plane encourages, we notice almost immediate occurrences: We begin feeling more grounded into our life experience. This is because these uncomfortable feelings lead us directly into an awareness of the shadow we run away from, and by consciously drawing the shadow towards us, we approach the runway of reality. Approaching the experience of "being grounded" may be so unfamiliar to us, that as we consciously engage our landing gear, we experience a sense of anxiety. It is a bit like the moment just before a planeā€™s wheels impact the runway; there is a sense of "holding on" or "holding back". However, the moment we allow ourselves to relax into the uncomfortable felt-resonance within the upset we are recalling, we gradually come down to earth and appreciate the groundedness initiated by the experience. This grounding causes a sense of relief, just like the moment after touching down on the runway and knowing we are once again safely upon the earth. Once we are grounded into the physical location of the feeling within our body, we notice that an energetic movement begins within this sensation. The actual sensation through which the uncomfortable emotional state is anchored into our physical body, which has been stuck or blocked, starts transforming. It transforms because our awareness is our tool of transformation. Often this inner movement is experienced as an upward rise of energy through our chest area and up into our head which may culminate in tearing up. Yes, as we sink down into it, it rises up! Who would have thought? outwardly, we also notice that the more grounded into the inner feeling we become, the more alive, vital, and animated the world around us becomes. Our experience of being here upon earth ceases to appear as a flat inanimate encounter, but instead takes on a textured hue, an energetic aura. This is because we, through consciously grounding ourselves, arrive more fully into the present moment of our current experience. Only when we allow ourselves to engage fully with the moment we are in now do we real eyes how heavenly this earthly experience is. GARDENING OUR HEART It is up to us to give ourselves the experience of the consequences of consciously gardening our heart. If we require "understanding" before we are willing to take on this responsibility, it is only because we are trying to comprehend what is being offered here from our seat within the maze of the mental plane. The heart cannot be understood; it can only be engaged. Only when we engage our heart do we enter a marriage made in heaven. The following simple practice, when engaged consistently, shows us, through personal experience, that it is the garden of the heart from which all the fruits of a joyful, healthy, and abundant life experience are seeded, cultivated, and harvested. It is also from within the garden of the heart that we consciously awaken to the experience of the conscious death that fruits eternal rebirth. By tending to the garden of the heart consistently each day, we experience the miraculous. It reveals to us what it really means to "love and take care of ourselves"; to stand by ourselves no matter what. To initiate this encounter with the heart it is recommended we tend to our garden for a few minutes at the beginning and the end of each day, and also in the midst of any unexpected upset. This is how simple it is: We sit comfortably in a quiet place where we will not be interrupted. (If we truly seek to be authentic when entering this practice, we switch our cell phone to "off". Otherwise, we are just doing this because nothing else is currently stealing our attention.) We recall an upset, whether it is something that happened recently, or something currently festering within our physical, mental, and emotional experience. We drop the story and the details of the physical events surrounding it, and instead place our attention fully on "how we feel about it". Where seek out where we feel this discomfort within our body? We place our attention within this location and "cradle it". While keeping the eyes of our heart upon the uncomfortable feeling within our body, we simultaneously keep our physical eyes open, and in a relaxed manner, we observe the world before us. We observe how the inner feeling moves, and how, as it does, the outer world simultaneously increases in presence. When we stray off into the mental again, we gently bring our attention back into the inner feeling within our body and simultaneously upon the presence of the outer world. We cradle this experience for as long as we feel necessary. NOTE: If we do not have an upset to consciously work with, we enter the practice by consciously placing our attention within the center of our chest and hold it there, following the above instructions, until we feel complete. The practice of consistently placing of our attention within the center of our chest is equally powerful in initiating "the death experience" that invites the blessing of rebirth within all unintegrated aspects of our life experience. Eventually, through this practice, we discover that the feelings of discomfort underlying our unintegrated upsets are gradually integrated and replaced by stillness, silence, and a sense of balance and peace within our heart. Over time these feelings of balance and peace organically radiate into our thoughts and are reflected back through our outer physical circumstances. As a consequence of daily and consistently facing our shadow and grounding ourselves through it, we begin also decreasing our addiction to escaping into the mental plane as a means to initiate a change in the quality of our life experience. We discover, when consistently attending to the garden of the heart in this way, by watering, weeding, and fertilizing it with our cradled attention, that it gradually lifts unnoticed veils and reveals the depth of the immensity of the life experience available to us all in each moment. By attending to the heart in this manner, the teachings we receive internally through revelation free us of "following others", of wandering through endless conceptual spiritual mazes, and of "the seekers seemingly unscratchable itch". This practice gradually frees us of "spiritual delusion", or "the spiritual disease", as Adyashanti aptly calls it. As we become familiar with "the death experience", and surrender to the companionship of its divine presence within the ever-changing currents of our life, we are reborn, again, and again, and again. This rebirthing nourishes a deepening awareness of what it means "to live fully within the radiance of the present moment". Entering life more fully, by consciously and consistently entering the heart, really is this simple. However, to fully receive the revelation of the simple teaching shared here, requires experientially entering "the heart of the matter" as a way of being in this world and not as "something we need to do, and get over with, so that we can get on with something else". This teaching and the consequences it initiates is the Dharma of The Sacred Heart. "Itā€™s not about feeling better ā€“ itā€™s about getting better at feeling." http://community.livingunbound.net/index.php?/topic/472-working-with-emotions/
  18. Beyond the spiritual heart

    One of the rare few just stood up and said hi. Hi. I really don't get where you are going with your own mind stuff. Are you saying it is impossible to touch another's mind? This is getting old. Same attacks just a different thread.
  19. Beyond the spiritual heart

    I like this :http://www.dharmadownload.net/pages/english/Natsok/0014_Leksheyling_teaching/leksheyling_teachings_0012.htm Venerable Chƶje Lama Phuntsok Yidam Deities in Vajrayana Generally speaking, there are three vehicles of practice in Buddhism: Hinayana, Mahayana, and Vajrayana. Today I wish to speak about Vajrayana. Meditating a Yidam deity is central in Vajrayana. It is crucial for Vajrayana practitioners to know that Yidam deities are not external to oneā€™s own mind, rather they are images that help us work with our own mind. Yidams are the unblemished reflection of the primordial and innate true nature of our mind that manifests in specific forms and colors. The purpose and goal of our practice is to attain perfect Buddhahood, which manifests in three aspects or forms at fruition ā€“ the Dharmakaya, Sambhogakaya, and Nirmanakaya. It is important to know that the three kayas are indivisible. Describing the three kayas briefly: Dharmakaya is the true nature or essence of Buddhahood that appears as the Sambhogakaya; the two kayas are not separate from one another. The Dharmakaya, that has no form and is therefore intangible, is the vast state or fundamental ground of the mindā€™s true nature that is free from inherent existence and adventitious stains; it cannot be fathomed and cannot be described in words. The unblemished, vast ground of oneā€™s mind that is free from discursive thoughts, the Dharmakaya, is replete with great clarity and creativity and continuously manifests in a perceptible form, which, from the ultimate state of Buddhahood, is the Sambhogakaya, ā€œthe body of complete enjoyment.ā€ Manifestations of the Sambhogakaya are referred to as Yidam deities. A Vajrayana practitioner turns his or her attention towards a depiction of one of the many Yidams that represent the ultimate state of enlightenment. The great variety of Yidam deities have the same essence and are images of the many manifestations of enlightenment, for example, as Noble Chenrezig, Arya Tara, Bodhisattva Manjushri or the wrathful appearances such as Vajravarahi and Chakrasamvara. Itā€™s important to distinguish between how things are and how things appear and to know that the essence of the manifold appearances of enlightenment is one and the same, namely the intangible Dharmakaya. Things appear in a limitless number of forms ā€“ thick, thin, flat, square, round, and so forth. They appear in many colors and in their combination ā€“ white, blue, yellow, red, and green. And so, enlightenment manifests in a great variety of forms and ways. When we perceive and apprehend an appearance that accords with our propensities and inclinations ā€“ our wants and needs -, then we are happy about the appearance. When we apprehend an appearance that doesnā€™t accord with our personal inclinations, then we are less pleased with it. The manifestation of Yidams, which are an expression of enlightenment, are free from the necessity of appearing in a specific form or in a certain color, rather every Yidam is a reflection of our personal wants and needs. Being an image of peopleā€™s various capabilities and inclinations, some Yidams appear white in color, like Noble Chenrezig, others are blue, yellow, red, or green and have different forms. In truth, Yidams are the display of the immense compassion of the Buddhas. Is the Yidam deity we meditate a truly existent, permanent entity? It is important to know that this is not the case. All Yidams arise in dependence in that they are created by our own mind. If one meditates a Yidam deity that one creates and cultivates with oneā€™s mind intensively for a long period of time and accomplishes the aim of the practice, then one will have realized the actual and true manifestation of the Sambhogakaya. A beginning practitioner works at creating an image of a Yidam like Noble Chenrezig by imagining his color and all details of his form as clearly as possible. Itā€™s impossible for a beginner to see the image with opened eyes, so, knowing that one is engaging in the methods of practice by creating the image of a Yidam, one closes oneā€™s eyes lightly and practices seeing the inner image until one sees it clearly. If one practices diligently, then the Yidam one meditates will eventually directly manifest. A practitioner of the Buddhadharma strives to attain Buddhadhood, complete and perfect enlightenment that manifests as the three kayas at fruition. Buddhahood is attained through the gradual process of transforming oneself into the body of perfect enlightenment by overcoming and finally eradicating oneā€™s destructive emotions that are veils concealing oneā€™s true nature. Oneā€™s body, speech, and mind manifest as primordial purity when Buddhahood has been attained. When one has attained Buddhaood, oneā€™s body will have been transformed into the Nirmanakaya, oneā€™s speech into the Sambhogakaya, and oneā€™s mind into the Dharmakaya. The three terms designate the goal that is eventually achieved through practice. Complete purification of oneā€™s impurities that conceal oneā€™s true nature is called Dharmakaya, Sambhogakaya, and Nirmanakaya; they are called mind, speech, and body for ordinary beings who have not vanquished their impurities and who have not attained fruition. And all along, the essence of the pure kayas and the essence of the impure aspects of ordinary living beings are and always will be the same. The main purpose of practice is to transform oneā€™s impure perception of appearances and apprehension of experiences that determine oneā€™s life into pure and untainted perceptions and apprehensions. Therefore, in order to cleanse oneā€™s impure way of perceiving and apprehending things, one repeatedly meditates the immaculate appearance of a Yidam deity. Practice consists of focusing oneā€™s attention on a pure image of enlightenment, a Yidam, until oneā€™s perception of the purity of all appearances becomes clear and brilliant and determines oneā€™s life. It isnā€™t possible to attain this goal right away, and that is why beginners fabricate thoughts about a Yidam while cultivating it during meditation practice. Beginners close their eyes and imagine the form, color, and ornaments of a specific Yidam, i.e., they simultaneously practice creating the pure physical, verbal, and mental aspects of the Yidam. The physical aspect of practice is visualizing the body of the Yidam as clearly as possible. The verbal aspect is reciting the mantra of the deity. And the mental aspect is concentrating oneā€™s attention one-pointedly on the image and mantra of the Yidam without becoming distracted. Of course, it isnā€™t possible to perfect all three aspects of a Yidam such as Noble Chenrezig all at once and from the start, so one begins slowly and step by step by concentrating on the eyes, then on the head of the deity, continuing with its shoulders and entire body. One practices again and again, and, like all things in life, practice makes perfect. Through repeated and regular practice over a longer period of time the entire image of the Yidam will clearly appear in oneā€™s mind. Practitioners can have doubts and wonder whether the Yidam exists or not and whether the practice is beneficial or not. There is no reason to have doubts if one is aware of the fact that the image of the Yidam is not born outside oneself, since one knows that one is creating it with oneā€™s imagination and with oneā€™s eyes closed. If one continues practicing, then eventually one will see the image of the pure deity as the manifestation of oneā€™s own perception with opened eyes. Itā€™s important to be assured that a practitioner doesnā€™t walk around seeing blue or white images holding flowers in their hands, rather fruition means that a successful practitioner sees phenomena free from any personal, conceptual and emotional blemishes. Perception of the true nature of all appearances and experiences has three aspects ā€“ clarity, unchanging, and perfect purity. This means to say that by practicing meditation diligently, a practitioner eventually perceives the essence of phenomena clearly and brilliantly. Furthermore, he or she sees that the essence of phenomena doesnā€™t fluctuate by coming and going, but is changeless, and that it is perfectly pure, which means to say that it isnā€™t blemished by impeding veils of disturbing emotions and thoughts. We are followers of Vajrayana, and the heart of the Vajrayana path is meditating a Yidam deity. As said, itā€™s important not to have any illusions and to know that it isnā€™t easy to clearly perceive an enlightened Yidam. Traditionally, Yidam meditation practices were carried out in a three-year retreat, but if one practices diligently and becomes accustomed to generating and visualizing a deity, then eventually the visualization will arise clearly and distinctly. Red Chenrezig is the main practice of KagyĆ¼pa three-year retreatants. If a practitioner isnā€™t distracted and naturally and easefully abides in one-pointed concentration on Red Chenrezig for a while, then it can happen that he or she sees the entire room bathed in a vibrant, red color. It can also happen that retreatants lose their feeling for time, i.e., they lose their feeling for morning, noon, and night, even while taking their meals. This is a sign that a practitionerā€™s perception has become lucid, constant, and pure, i.e., he or she has become unaffected by time. These two examples are based upon my own experience. Another experience I had is that when the three aspects described above manifest, then one reaches a point at which every appearance is seen in the same way. Meditating a Yidam is extremely helpful when it comes to dealing with daily samsaric appearances and experiences that we continuously face. Cultivating and identifying with the pure appearance of a Yidam deity again and again and over a longer period of time alleviates the impact that impure and painful experiences otherwise have. Everyone has problems and they vary from one person to the other. If a practitioner becomes accustomed to a pure Yidam that is not made of matter, then the force and strength of problems that everyone encounters and that everybody has weaken and diminish and as a result itā€™s easier dealing with them. There are three prerequisites for Yidam practice to be beneficial: the person who meditates, the object of meditation, and the way the visualization is practiced. All three factors need to be united. It is very important to remember that the image of a Yidam that one produces and cultivates in oneā€™s meditation does not arise and exist outside oneā€™s own mind. It would be a grave illusion to think that the Yidam one produces during meditation practice is an external entity that truly exists and is other than oneself. A Yidam is a beneficial and wholesome projection of oneā€™s own mind that one works with. There are various ways of generating a Yidam deity in the different traditions. For example, there is the tradition of visualizing a Yidam in front of oneself in space and there is the tradition of visualizing oneself as a Yidam. A practitioner visualizes Red Chenrezig both in space as well as himself or herself in the form of the deity during a three-year retreat. One visualizes oneā€™s ordinary body in the form of a Yidam, because, as it is, one is extremely attached to oneā€™s body, speech, and mind due to thinking that they truly exist and stand for a self one believes in and clings to. The purpose of visualizing oneself as a Yidam is to diminish and slowly overcome attachment to the self that one believes in and clings to. Meditating again and again that oneā€™s body, speech, and mind are not different than the pure body, speech, and mind of a Yidam and that they are indivisible decreases and eventually eradicates oneā€™s attachment to the ordinary idea one has of oneself that one clings to and that one is convinced really exists. It happens naturally and isnā€™t hard identifying with oneā€™s ordinary body, speech, and mind and calling it ā€œme,ā€ and it isnā€™t easy giving up clinging to the impure body, speech, and mind one identifies with so strongly and points to as ā€œI.ā€ One needs to exert energy and practice, seeing one isnā€™t accustomed to experiencing the true and pure nature of oneā€™s being. The aim of Vajrayana is to progressively replace oneā€™s ordinary, gross perception with a pure perception of what is true. Hinayana practitioners also learn to vanquish attachment to a self by intensively contemplating the impure substances that make up everyoneā€™s body. Vajrayana practitioners, in contrast, do not give up clinging to a self by shunning appearances, rather they learn to purify their delusive relationship with appearances and experiences and then can give up their attachment and clinging to what they call ā€œself and others.ā€ Mahayana practitioners realize that all appearances - including their own body, tiniest atoms, and all constituents - are empty of inherent existence and only exist in dependence on other things. By realizing the empty nature of all sensory perceptions and apprehensions, they purify their impure cognition of reality and in the process give up clinging to a self and others. Lord Buddha presented many methods of practice so that we can purify our delusive apprehensions of the world and sentient beings. Vajrayana practitioners engage in the result of the path while practicing, whereas followers of Sutrayana focus their attention on the cause that leads to the result. We saw that Buddhahood denotes realization of the indivisibility of the three kayas. Vajrayana practitioners identify with all three ultimate dimensions of reality, the result, by meditating and cultivating a Yidam while on the path to enlightenment, which means to say that they take the result as the path. Attainment of the result, Buddhahood, doesnā€™t mean arriving at another location or being transposed, rather it means having gradually transformed oneā€™s subtle channels (nadi in Sanskrit), winds (prana), and vital essences (bindu). At Buddhahood, the subtle channels that support oneā€™s body are completely purified and are the Nirmanakaya; the subtle winds that support oneā€™s speech are purified and are the Sambhogakaya; and the vital essences that support oneā€™s mind are purified to the extent that oneā€™s ordinary, conceptual mind that creates dualistic thoughts is purified and transformed into pristine awareness, which is the true nature of oneā€™s mind, the Dharmakaya. There are four classes of tantra in Vajrayana: action tantra (kriya tantra in Sanskrit), conduct tantra (charya tantra), yoga tantra (yoga tantra), and hightest yoga tantra (anuttarayoga tantra). Anuttarayoga tantra is the profoundest level of practice that is carried out in the frame of the Six Yogas of Naropa, at which stage the subtle channels, winds, and vital essences are central. Practitioners of Anuttarayoga donā€™t visualize Yidam deities anymore, but directly employ the pure aspects of body, speech, and mind, i.e., the unblemished manifestation of the self-perfected state. At fruition, our ordinary body, speech, and mind are transformed into their innate purity, in which case our mind is free of all contrivances and abides in simplicity. Generally speaking, the subtle channels, winds, and vital essences are very powerful. When blockages in the channels are unravelled, i.e., the knots untied, and the winds can flow through them smoothly, then a practitioner doesnā€™t become sick anymore. Sicknesses arise due to blockages and disturbances in oneā€™s subtle body. These blockages and disturbances and their interplay bring on sicknesses and diseases, which one experiences with oneā€™s mind with sadness and woe. This process is referred to as suffering. If through practice one frees oneā€™s subtle channels, winds, and vital essences of knots and disturbances, then one will be healthy and will experience happiness and bliss. If one can unite oneā€™s subtle body, speech, and mind with the purity of a Yidamā€™s body, speech, and mind, then oneā€™s channels, winds, and vital essences will have become purified and free. As a result, one will experience less sicknesses and suffering and, instead, one will experience happiness and joy. We saw that meditating a Yidam is central to Vajrayana, just as it is central to Mahayoga, and we should know that Yidams are directly related to oneself and accomplished when one has perfectly purified oneā€™s subtle channels, winds, and vital essences. And so, it is evident that Yidams donā€™t exist outside or are separate from us, but are images of our own purity. Itā€™s important to distinguish between a designated Yidam and an actual Yidam. When speaking of Noble Chenrezig, for instance, we are referring to a designated deity. The actual and true deity is oneā€™s own purified body, speech, and mind. Impure appearances are impure perceptions and apprehensions. When oneā€™s impure perceptions and apprehensions have been purified and therefore overcome, then oneā€™s ordinary body, ordinary speech, and ordinary mind will have been transformed into a vajra body, vajra speech, and vajra mind, which are the three aspects of enlightenment (the Nirmanakaya, Sambhogakaya, and Dharmakaya). At the moment, one isnā€™t able to connect or experience the actual Yidam. So one identifies with a designated Yidam that one produces with oneā€™s thoughts in order to eventually experience and realize the actual Yidam. A practitioner begins by visualizing and identifying as best as he or she possibly can with a completely pure Yidam. Calm abiding or insight meditation are not topics of Yidam practice, which deals with the practice of meditating a deity. There are innumerable practices. Since followers and practitioners have a huge amount of varying propensities and inclinations, there are a great number of Yidams in Vajrayana, starting with their various colors and forms. The great number of Yidam deities in Vajrayana can be compared to a menu in a big restaurant ā€“ every guest is free to choose the meal they prefer having. Vajrayana is like that too, seeing oneā€™s practice is enhanced if the Yidam one creates accords with and satisfies oneā€™s preferences and needs. There are practitioners who prefer meditating Noble Chenrezig, others feel more comfortable meditating Arya Tara; others want to meditate Sangye Menla, who is Medicine Buddha. Yet other practitioners want to meditate Buddha Amitabha. These deities appear in different forms, but, irrelevant of the outer form, every practice is beneficial and leads to the same result. There are many disciples who prefer meditating wrathful Yidams, such as Vajravarahi or Chakrasamvara or Kalachakra or Mahakala, and these practices bring the same result as meditating a peaceful deity. There are disciples who fear practicing Mahakala, for example, whereas other disciples really like meditating Mahakala, and this is what is meant when speaking about individual propensities and inclinations. In any case, Vajrayana practice consists of identifying with a Yidam, which is an extraordinary method when compared to practices taught in other vehicles. Again, itā€™s important to differentiate between a Yidam designated and created by oneā€™s mind with oneā€™s thoughts and the actual and true Yidam. Hinayana and Mahayana followers often have great doubts when they see all the Vajrayana deities and think, ā€œWhat a lot of constructs that lead away from the absolute truth.ā€ So itā€™s important to differentiate and understand the meaning and purpose of Yidam practice. Due to the exceptional methods, Vajrayana is also called ā€œSecret Mantrayana.ā€ I have spoken briefly about the principle and foundation of Vajrayana practice here. Thank you very much.
  20. Beyond the spiritual heart

    Hi Bindi, For centuries, biblical scholars followed the Augustinian hypothesis: that the Gospel of Matthew was the first to be written, Mark used Matthew in the writing of his, and Luke followed both Matthew and Mark in his (the Gospel of John is quite different to the other three, which because of their similarity are called the Synoptic Gospels). Nineteenth-century New Testament scholars who rejected Matthew's priority in favor of Markan priority speculated that Matthew's and Luke's authors drew the material they have in common with the Gospel of Mark from Mark's Gospel. But Matthew and Luke also share large sections of text not found in Mark. They suggested that neither Gospel drew upon the other, but upon a second common source, termed Q.[9][10] Herbert Marsh, an Englishman, is seen by some as the first person to hypothesize the existence of a "narrative" source and a "sayings" source, although he included in the latter parables unique to Matthew and unique to Luke.[11] In his 1801 work, A dissertation on the Origin and Composition of our Three First Canonical Gospels, he used the Hebrew letter Aleph (א) to denote the narrative source and the letter beth (ב) to denote the sayings source.[12] In The Four Gospels: A Study of Origins (1924), Burnett Hillman Streeter argued that a third hypothetical source, referred to as M, lies behind the material in Matthew that has no parallel in Mark or Luke.[15] And some material present only in Luke might have come from an also unknown L source. This four-source hypothesis posits that there were at least four sources to the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke: the Gospel of Mark, and three lost sources: Q, M, and L. (M material is represented by green in the above chart.) Throughout the remainder of the 20th century, there were various challenges and refinements of Streeter's hypothesis. For example, in his 1953 book The Gospel Before Mark, Pierson Parker posited an early version of Matthew (Aramaic M or proto-Matthew) as the primary source.[16] Parker argued that it was not possible to separate Streeter's "M" material from the material in Matthew parallel to Mark.[17][18] In the early 20th century, more than a dozen reconstructions of Q were made. But these reconstructions differed so much from each other that not a single verse of Matthew was present in all of them. As a result, interest in Q subsided and it was neglected for many decades. This state of affairs changed in the 1960s after translations of a newly discovered and analogous sayings collection, the Gospel of Thomas, became available. James M. Robinson of the Jesus Seminar and Helmut Koester proposed that collections of sayings such as Q and Gospel of Thomas represented the earliest Christian materials at an early point in a trajectory that eventually resulted in the canonical gospels. I think this is a pretty hard point for either of us to prove or disprove. I think on this we both have to accept each other views. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_source