Karl

I would call me violent either. Don't think I've been in a fight for over 45 years.

Nah, prefer it my way.

I have problems with irrational morons, be they old, young, or in-between. I'm unbiased. Ive not tried to stop you pointing out my 'violent' language, as pointless as that actually is. Have you tried counting sheep or playing I spy ?

Vocalises violence ? -I hope so, that way I avoid using a club on my fellow man. These young lefties are acting violently. Some are clearly disappointed when something doesn't 'kick off'. If I want to use colourful language to get my point across, then I will. Do you require a 'safe space' little snowflake ?

Doubt it, that's the dream of the Corbynites. A tiny group of vocal and often violent people who have more in common with the national front fascists than soft liberals. I imagine the USA is headed towards a collapse and likely civil unrest on a wide scale. What comes out of it I hope is far better than what went before. With luck you will find your constitution and start laissez faire capitalism going.

Trump is no longer important. Win or lose it makes no difference. It's like a giant comet hit the Earth and you are still prattling on about who won the Super bowl.

So what ? There have been numerous Kangaroo trials to derail a candidate prior to an election. Hitlers hanging judge conducted hundreds of them. I doubt Trump is guilty of anything at all bar a bit of shady dealing connected with Clinton and Co. It will probably end up being added to the pyre that they will light under the Clintons in due course. We already know that Bill is a violent rapist and Hillary is his moll. Now we have the paedophile Weiner swimming in the same water. If those emails were kept as 'life insurance' then what emerges have a great likelihood of producing other startling things. I don't know why you are still defending Hillary by deflecting to Trump ? You refuse to put the spotlight on someone who is clearly guilty and is a remorseless liar. I don't get it Ralis. By all means talk about Trump, but it is no longer relevant at this point.

Hell hath no fury like a defeated liberal :-) just like lefty metropolitan macchiato drinkers went mental when they realised they had lost the EU referendum. 6 months later that remain in denial. Our referendum has nothing like the intrigue an immensity of what's going on in the USA. I like to think I was a part of it as a leave campaigner. The fire caught in the USA and it's coming to France, Germany and Italy next.

As Trump himself said that he didn't need the crap that comes along with threatening the status quo, but he knew he would get it. He would have no doubts about the information they would have on him and that they would use it. He had no immunity as Hillary does, no protection from Clinton media. Anyway, the Trump/Clinton thing is over now these emails have emerged. I said before that it didn't matter whether Trump wins or loses, he has won. Things will never be the same again.

Has anyone heard the rumour about the 1.8 billion the Clinton foundation moved to Quatar. That they are apparently building a massive palace for some VIP from the US ?

I'm surprised they hadn't suicider Weiner previously. It appears he was the weak spot in a solidly corrupt group who kept it together. Maybe they suspected he had information that could be released if he died-like 650K emails ? If he was prepared to burn down the palace rather than just stab a few of the residents, then they might have been forced into trying to control him like a wayward prince.

It's interesting how paedophillia is rife amongst corrupt power seekers. It's like drugs for the junkies. It must be part of their mentality once the corruption becomes solidified. I suppose children are seen as innocents that they can spoil, they get their power by destroying the potential in others. It's like serial muderers that get their kicks out of watching their victims die.

Don't be an arse. You assume far too much. I'm talking of a system of free market laissez faire capitalism and not what we have currently. When people have no rights to their own property, production or happiness then they are not free. The problem is that you have to grasp that this is so. I do not believe that people who have less money, or who are homeless are obnoxious, I know they are the sad refuse of a system that has stripped them of their self esteem and self confidence. I hate that this is what has happened to them and I hate it that our Governments strip money from the productive, take a fat cut for themselves and throw them crumbs on which they have become dependent. What causes people to lose self esteem and confidence-the initiation of force. It is force that destroys reason, it kills men's spirits, it rewards those who seek power and prestige and disinsentivises production. It penalises the producers, it destroys the good for being the good and rewards the corrupt. The do gooders simply destroy the poor without giving them any hope of being able to rise from their knees. The do gooders can feel good only by having a vast supply of downtrodden poor.

There is no more doubt. There are 650K emails on that server apparently in a file marked 'life insurance'. How did they get on Weiners computer ? It's relatively easy to work out that a flakey pervert like Weiner was not clever enough to cover his tracks. What's the chance he realised he would be caught, or that he had already been caught and was being blackmailed ? Hillary knows very well that whatever was on her own server was poison and that's why she bleached it and destroyed the other devices with a hammer. This woman has been engaged in corruption within a corrupt system for so long that she has lost any sense of reality. It's like succesful rock stars that become so lost in their sudden fame and fortune that they live the kind of life that is equivalent to a burned out junky, or rapidly deteriorating alcoholic. In Hillarys case it's like a society in which everyone is either fawning for favours and prestige, or they are stabbing others in the back to get the top. The law doesn't apply. The people outside don't apply. It's a henetically sealed bubble and the those outside it are just numbers of cattle. Rarely does the sunlight filter through, but at election time the bubble is dependent on the cattle to maintain its integrity. It does everything it can to make the cattle feel inclusive with media narrative, smiles and the promise of free stuff, peace and jobs. Once the bubble is pierced, then the destruction is relative to the level of corruption inside of it. This bubble is very corrupt. The central bankers bubbles are very corrupt. It's like intensified explosive power getting ever stronger and ripe for a massive explosion. The degree of internal corruption foretells the degree to which those inside it will go to shelter themselves. Hillary would happily press the nuclear button and hide with her acolytes in a bunker. She would do anything to avoid it ending.

If you still think voting for Hillary is wise after all this, then you reveal yourself as an amoral, liar devoid of a conscience. A great rant by Stefan Molyneux.

Then you have never met a capitalist and you have never heard a capitalist. Capitalist believe man should have the freedom to own the fruits of his own effort and that he trades voluntarily with other men value for value. We are all equal in that we possess the faculty of reason in order that we can survive by producing. Everyone is free to produce and the more productive one is, then the greater wealth there is for everyone because of free trade. Even relatively poor producers can thrive in a laissez faire capitalist system. Here is the reality. If you can't or won't produce, then you cannot eat. There is no excuse for men who are fit and devoid of mental deformities not to produce for themselves and to trade with other men. No one is guaranteed a meal, they may get one by charity, by the mercy of other men, but they have not earned it. To have a value, one must earn a value.

Have you heard the rumour that the emails were saved under a file called 'life insurance' ? This might only be a rumour. There are also 350k emails on Weiners laptop.

They might have an issue if there is some protection for Huma as the emails were on his computer not on hers. Clinton has no one but herself to blame even if this all turns out to be a storm in a teacup. Delaying handing over the server, wiping it with bleach-bit, smashing up a laptop and lying at every turn. Then putting pressure on the FBI to back off. She looks as guilty as hell. What FBI director would dare to just let it go and then get the full wrath of the US public ? An impossible position for Comey. Still, there is no smoke without fire, it's just a matter of finding that fire.

So what ? If it had been Clinton, or Bush with a noose then that's OK by you ? It's clearly about the current presidential team and not African Americans generally-the words underneath make it clear enough. I don't think white people are still hanging black people in the USA-since the state cancelled it's apartheid policy put in place by the Democrats and carried our by the KKK Democratic Party alliance. Kind of Ironic.

The investigation should never have been closed. It was clearly swept under the carpet with no attempt to pursue it beyond asking Clinton if she was guilty. I would guess that Comey is now under extreme pressure as he may have effectively implicated the entire FBI in a conspiracy. When things start getting hot, then people begin looking for scapegoats to sacrifice and the more junior FBI will be well aware of the chances of becoming a sacrificial offering. Something big has broken. Comey is being challenged by the Elite to expose the entire thing, which probably includes himself. How high and deep does it go ? Apparently next week Anonymous (who released the emails and claim they are not Russian, but global) will post video footage of Clinton.

It's Obama and not African Americans. I can't read the rest of the text so I've no idea what the person is demonstrating against. Something to do with Bengahzi ? Anyway, it's not the right place for it IMO.

I would say that it wasn't the place to do it, especially as a university should be about free speech debate in places best suited to it. Who decides the speech is inflammatory ? The law, at least in Britain is pretty clear, that deliberately inciting violent action from others is illegal. For instance we have Muslims calling for Sharia law, that isn't inciting violence. Calling for Muslims to rise to Jihad against the infidel definitely is.

I'm guessing the tickets are paid for ? If so, it's a private event at a public place. At uni we had a central hall where we would go to see bands. The bands/ promoters we're hiring the space and as such they set the rules. I have said before that the notion of public spaces leads to clashes and riots because there are few rules. A public space is accepted as a place one may strike, demonstrate or speak. Remove the public areas and that problem vanishes. People can therefore only speak freely on their own property, or with an owners permission. The funny thing here is that I know that you would reject the idea of privately owned streets despite you apparent objection to the type of open free speech and demonstrations that it encourages. Your answer appears to be to shut down free speech completely, which is totalitarianism. It would deprive people, especially minorities, of the opportunity to defend themselves. I'm not sure you care though ?

That's not free speech, that's abuse of private property on which he has no permission to do so. Same on this forum, the mods make the rules.

Can't disagree with you on that score DB. Grab some popcorn.