Jamyang Khedrup
-
Content count
74 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Jamyang Khedrup
-
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
Wow! This thread is hitting 600 views. That's a lot more than when we were just three people on the thread this week. Lots of new people showing up fast here. That's good news. -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
Right. No problem. I think that translating this whole thread into Tibetan for Wikipedia will be a major work seeing Shambhala is predicted in the Buddhist Kalachakra. "Mad Max" Nungali doesn't speak Tibetan, does he? (I've tried to understand what he's driving at seeing he seems to think very highly of himself; but does he speak Tibetan? It's really an issue for this thread that people speak the language. No use in speaking if one can't use any words, right? A language without words is meaningless, isn't it? Animals don't need words but they're so-called "dumb" (have no speech.).) -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
Much appreciated Cobie. I didn't know you were intelligent. Can we speak in Tibetan here? Can you translate the whole thread for Tibetan Wikipedia? Are you a Buddhist? The two others in the thread are not Buddhists and just do their Buddhist-hating trip. ཁྱོད་ཀྱིས་བོད་སྐད་ག་ནས་ཧ་གོ་པ་རེད། -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
Nungali, You're the typical Aussie Mad Max, who gives a forke about everybody and lives in his head. I thot you'd like Hulagu because he's more less the same as you. A lawless, weird, freak of nature. The Bonpos on the model of David Snellgrove are nothing but Christian Buddha-haters, who's sectarian intolerance for Buddhism is reflected in their relentless, panting, hate-drenched promotion of Bon. You Christians should love Hulagu. Aussies a penitentiary colony of English convicts' descendants, right? Am I right? Just askin'. Wondering about that for some time. Pretty awesome DNA there, right? Hulagu was a Tengrist like all the Mongols were. They never totally abandoned their faith. Tengrism was and is a shamanic warriors' wild faith. When the Mongols converted to other religions it wasn't Peace Prize converts to intellectual heights. They kept up their warring, and invasions. The Mongols were cherry-picking what religion to choose among the many available to them. Hulagu was no scholar, and merely defended Buddhism and Christianity against the seeping influence of Islam. Just like Buddhism accepted the Greek gods into Tantrism, as well as Hindu gods, likewise, the Mongols adopted all faiths including Islam from before Hulagu's times, in Genghis Khan's time already. But the war against nations was also mixed with wars on faiths for the Mongols. There were disputes among faiths at the Mongol court and the Khans would arbitrate the disputes. Hulagu was an arbiter and that role is what is illustrated through his biography. We must revisit that now and spread that research to the Tibetan world via Wikipedia's many pages which we must write in Tibetan and need the help of all the Tibetans we can find to do it and write in good literate, educated Tibetan. There is a very important reference to the Sky-God Tengri in Hulagu's biography which is the multiple reference to the name of Sham because it fits with Shambhala in the Tibetan Kalachakra and that reflects the Mongol god Tengri in the following manner. Shambhala is the anagram of Baalshamin. So the writers of the Mongol biographical history were really tricksters! Baal is the sky-god of the Antiquity of the Middle East. Using the name of Sham in reference to Hulagu was thus throwing back to the ancient sky-god Baal in echo to Hulagu's own faith in Tengri. In the Kalachakra the King of Demons which the King of Shambhala defeats is called Krinmati. The Kalachakra says that the King of Shambhala reincarnates throughout History. Who would that King Krinmati (who was the the King of Baghdad in Hulagu's time) be today? Newsweek ran an editorial which was criticized at the time, entitled: Belief Watch: Is Obama the Antichrist? Lisa Miller the Senior Editor of Newsweek wrote it. excerpt: On Nov. 5, Todd Strandberg was at his desk, fielding E-mails from around the world. As the editor and founder of RaptureReady.com, his job is to track current events and link them to biblical prophecy in hopes of maintaining his status as "the eBay of prophecy," the best source online for predictions and calculations concerning the end of the world. Already Barack Obama had drawn the attention of apocalypse watchers after an anonymous e-mail circulated among conservative Christians in October implying that he was the Antichrist. Former "Saturday Night Live" ingénue Victoria Jackson fueled the fire when, according to news reports, she wrote on her Web site that Obama "bears traits that resemble the anti-Christ." Now Strandberg was receiving up-to-the-minute news from his constituents in Illinois. One of the winning lottery numbers in the president-elect's home state was 666— which, as everyone knows, is the sign of the Beast (also known as the Antichrist). "It is very eerie, and I take it for a sign as to who he really is," wrote one of Strandberg's correspondents. https://www.newsweek.com/belief-watch-obama-antichrist-84741 -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
Lairg was right. Some people have inbuilt failure mechanisms. "Bad is good". That's their mantra: aussies have worse education systems than the US, living in the bush with kangaroos, going on Aborignial "walkabouts" in the sticks, eating fresh bugs. -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
Aussie loser. Learn Tibetan. -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
Nungali you say Hulagu carried out scary rituals and had human sacrifice at his burial. I heard that too but would like to see the source. where that's stated. But I also know other things about Hulagu and I'm the one who said it first: he carried out gruesome massacres. Not only that but the Sack of Baghdad ("Siege of Baghdad" 1258) was the greatest massacre of all time. Hulagu himself bragged of killing two million there. In modern figures that would run in the tens of millions killed. Hulagu's Wikipedia page in the 2010 years stated he was a Christian or Tengrist, but didn't state anywhere that he was a Buddhist. Then in the last five years an Israeli scholar called Dan Yerusalmi, published six Tibetan letters sent to Hulagu by Tibetan lamas which explained that he was a pure total Buddhist. The reason Wikipedia hedged about saying Hulagu a Buddhist was they thought that no Buddhist could have carried out the violent and ruthless massacres which Hulagu did. But that's what Shambhala is about: it describes a King that uses terrifying weapons with razor-like edges. The nature of the actions of Hulagu are indeed beyond human imagination. Likewise, Putin is now razing half of Ukraine to the ground; likewise, the Russians razed the SS and Napoleon to the ground in the Russian winter. the Frenchman leaving 3/4 of his "Grande Army" in the marshes of the Russian plains, while Hitler lost most of his troops in the blistering cold because he forgot to send them warm clothes and he was formed to be a painter not a ruler. But Russia rose as a phoenix from it's ashes and donned the reputation of "Eternal Russia" that could withstand anything. Likewise, out of Iranian Azerbaijan, rose the Mongol Hulagu, who withstood the withering attacks of his own kin from the Russian Golden Horde, from his uncle's Chagataid Empire and overcome that, so that this empire endures to this day as Modern Iran. This is to say that these acts of warfare, and massacre lead to political destinies being dealt out that can be interpreted by each side as good or bad depending upon which camp they belong to. In my previous post above, I spoke about multiple Shams personages, in Sistan, which I said served asa yardstick to mark the stages of Hulagu's eighty years of dynastic rule. But there's also a trace of another Shams Tabraiz (missonary) in Kutch, Gujarat, India. Birwapa, the founder of Tibet's Sakya School, is also said to be absorbed into a statue in Kutch at his death but at an earlier date, either in the tenth or seventh century. He had devoted his life to battling against Hinduism and destroying Hindu idols throughout India and beyond (he seems to have traveled to Mecca or the Abassid Empireas well.). Buddhists supported the Muslims' onslaught (and Persian Ismailis conversion work in Pakistan....) against Hinduism. But the Muslims didn't respond in kind and hounded the Buddhists down. So we see with Hulagu's attitude towards an ambivalence and a typically tolerant Mongol refusal to reject Islam wholesale. Hulagu himself was very moderate on the subject and remarked "He favored Christians while his cousins favored Islam." Shambhala thus illustrates this attitude which is typically Mongol which is to set aside sectarian aspects and to settle matters only by military force alone. The Shambhala King's sharp, cutting weapons mentioned in the Kalachakra are thus a double-edged tolerance for Islam but moderated by vicious force and violence. After 400 years of persecution of Buddhists by Muslims, Buddhism was eradicated from India. Eighty years later Hulagu marched on Baghdad and razed it to the ground. The use of the namesake Shams resembles the name of Shambhala, and marks the various stages of Hulagu's empire but also the stages of Buddhism's battle against Islam both in Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Pakistan, India, Tibet. The name Shams is used by personages that marked the development of Islam's sects such as the Aga Khan's Ismailis. The Ismailis are accused of incorporating parts of Buddhism into it. So, Hulagu's work of mixing Buddhism into Sufism and Ismailism, means that his work of destroying Islam was complete. Islam cannot survive Hulagu and despite his legacy being shrouded in secrecy... and the Kalachakra's Shambhala Kingdom is "elusive" at best. But it's beyond any possible doubt that nothing in Hulagu's historical records of the Hulagid Empire is credible and it's 100% fake news. It should be read as a manual to understand how Buddhism totally subverted all the religions of the world so as to prove that they're 100% false and heretical and that the only and highest form of culture in the world is Tibetan Tantric Buddhism. But within Islam Hulagu promoted the setcs that most betrayed fanatical Islam and favored a tolerant and humanist Islam favorable to Buddhism which are today Ismaelism and Sufism. This is Shambhala's sharp razor-like weapon wielded by the World Savior and Messiah Hulagu Khan. Nungali, here in the West there's a nostalgic regret about Bon. David Snellgrove published the Hevajra Tantra of my Sakya School while he was not authorized to do so seeing it's a secret teaching of the Highest Yoga Tantras. He also wrote the apology of Bon. very shameful. I had the English wife of a Bon follower a university Heather Stoddard as Tibetan teacher. In French we say that"to know who someone is look at who their friends are." I didn't approve when they brought Tibetans from Tibet to teach us who were married to Chinese with CCP member-cards. I didn't like the Bonpo students among the French spreading their propaganda against Buddhism in school. I didn't like the Christian missionaries spreading their hatred among the students. I don't like people spreading their agit-propaganda in universities. the US and France is now swarmed with Islam-loving, Leftist "Woke" culture. Same in Oz? 450 (- going on 500 people) have watched this thread and Nungali, you say only Lairg and you are monitoring this thread. Not. Among those 450 there really must be at least one or two others watching this. They relay this information out to the outside world. Passing on the message of the discovery of Shambhala is an important message becoz it happens only once every 50000 years. ? Once every Bronze Age, Nun? For a royal like me to relay it is thus important headline, hair-raising news. There might be more than just one or two actual people reading this among the 450/550 hits of looking at this thread. Anyone want to translate this into Tibetan? (because the prophecy of the discovery of Shambhala is the most important news of Tibet and for the Tibetans and is prophecied in the Kalachakra to be at the end of times.) -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
There are two levels of wisdom in Tibetan Buddhism: the first is called Khepa and that means "learned". The second is Khepa Khepa. It means "very learned". The Khepas are the scholars and learned doctors of Buddhist philosophy who possess an encyclopedic knowledge, can talk for hours without reading their notes etc... But the Khepa Khepa are akin to 'omniscient' and garner other powers such as being able to speak to different people at the level those people can understand. The Khepa still are within that zone of error that you speak about Lairg. Getting distracted sucks. I have met lots of very learned Tibetans in my life, but few are really Khepa Khepa. What I take away is that one must rely upon intense study and on a qualified guru/lama who can guide us through the thick and the thin. -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
Nungali's smart Lairg, he's got a good brain. He's just not qualified for Buddhism or Tibetan matters like Kalachakra/Shambhala. -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
There are more and more Shams al-Dins as one goes on. And they're closely related to Hulagu and played determining roles in his career. Hulagu's successors fought numerous wars in the area of East Iranian Sistan, and the players in the region were kings that were called among others https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nasir_al-Din_Muhammad His uncle was called Shams al-Din Ali. His son was called Shams al-Din: excerpt: Nasir al-Din's son Shams al-Din 'Ali advanced on Quhistan, a Kartid appanage, and seized control of it. Shams al-Din soon ran into problems maintaining his hold over Quhistan, but was helped by military assistance from his father. Domestic improvements were also made, including the construction of irrigation canals and channels. Nasir al-Din fought against Shams ud-Din (i.e. the same name as Shams al-Din.) excerpt: "When Shams al-Din 'Ali was murdered in 1255, the Kartid malik Shams ud-Din occupied Shahr-i Sistan. Shams ud-Din went before Hulagu Khan and claimed that his seizure of Sistan was legitimate," === This incidence of Shams al-Din namesakes is surprising. Supposing that they were in the habit of naming their descendants after uncles or relatives, that's a common thing to do....but here, his enemy is called by the same name... Simultaneously, we see that the events surrounding these personages, involve Hulagu's descendants and their survival and their success as a dynasty is played out there, in Sistan. The stage in Sistan, is thus laid out for the dire hours of the Hulagid Dynasty to play out and it's destiny to be in put in question right on those grounds and the dynasty to emerge the winner. My interpretation is that the name of Shams al-Din that was chosen to be given to Hulagu as a pseudonym was chosen from the events in Sistan, because it's based upon those events that the Hulagids survived as a dynasty. Therefore, the Tibetans were probably keeping a worried eye upon events in Iran, so as to see if their champion the Buddhist Hulagu's heritage was being preserved and not "going to the dogs". Then after eighty years that Hulagu had died, I think the Tibetan author Buton Rinchen Drub decided to write the Hulagu biography under the guise of the Kalachakra Tantra. It was probably a homage to Hulagu. Buton at that time, breathed a sigh of relief that the Hulagu heritage had been successfully preserved and the Hulagids had triumphed. Hulagu was given the name of Shambhala in homage to the various multiple Shams al-Din opponents that had carried out the battles during the eighty years. I think those names had been massively trumped up out of thin air and what was the original Shams al-Din that had been taken as the first example to copy, how can one know? But looking at Nasir al-Din's biography, one sees that these events concerning people called Shams al-Din, started well far back - in 1236 - and they lasted until Nasir's death in 3018, who died 55 years after Hulagu's death. What happened back in 1236, was that the Mongols first invaded and the balance between Mongol clans started there. Indeed the first Shams al-Din Ali rallied to Hulagu's uncle Ogedeï. So I see that these successive Shams al-Din namesakes serve as a yardstick to measure Hulagu's progressive evolution in the region. From 1236 to 1318, that period covers the full length of the eighty years of Hulagu Khan's dynasty. So this region counted most vitally for the heritage of Hulagu's career and his legacy to history (and to Tibetan Buddhism's future). And it concerned Hulagu's kin: uncle Ogedeï, his brother Great Khan Mongke, the Jochids, who descended from Genghis Khans' oldest son Jochi (so, Hulagu's uncle); Hulagu's children, Abaqa Khan, Ahmed Tekudur Khan, Hulagu's great grandson Öljaitü Khan. So we see that the names of Shams al-Din represent the time-period of the full length of Hulagu's work. They cover as many as five or six generations of his family before and after him. Thus this name of Shams al-Din has been used by the historians of the the Mongol Khans as a yardstick to enumerate the dates, the people the battles and geographical places of the main battles led by Hulagu to assert himself and his dynasty throughout his empire of the "Ilkhanate". By choosing this pseudonym of Shams the historians were certainly working in accord with the Tibetans who were writing the hidden biography in their secret archives of the Kalachakra. the code-name of Shams had been agreed upon by the Tibetan and and the Mongol historians in Iran. They had agreed: "We'll call the secret name Shams for Shambhala and for the king of Shambhala. It will serve as a yardstick to remember what Hulagu's legacy and work was. Hulagu will be the sacred King of Shambhala. The World Savior." (Now we should wonder who the King of Demons is who is announced in the Kalachakra. Obama marked by 666...is Obama the Caliph of Baghdad, killed by Messiah Hulagu, again manifesting in this life? Antichrist.) In my opinion, that's name of Shams (matching with the name "Shambhala") was the secret pact of the Kalachakra that was reached and agreed upon between the Hulagids and Tibetans. I think that the writer that wrote up this invented Mongol History created a gulash of facts and fiction in which he put everything he could find in the past. But in my opinion, his goal was to illustrate the art with which Hulagu mixed his faith, his political action, and his Mongol clannish belonging. For the Tibetans, the only thing that counted was that their interests as Buddhists were preserved to the West and the border was protected against Islam. For that, what counted exclusively was that Hulagu's heritage be preserved by his successors. When Buton wrote the Kalachakra, the Hulagids had ruled with an iron grip upon all the Middle East and the borders of India, for eighty years. The basis for modern Iran had thus been set by the manifold marriages that his kin had contracted throughout the regions. -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
Yes, "something rotten in the Kingdom of Denmark". There's a suspicious "overpopulation" of Shams al-Din's in prominence during Hulagu's dynastic empire. There was a rash of Shamses and an epidemic of the same name: "Shams"!!! Not only that but in Tibet, eighty years later, after Hulagu's death, an author called Buton Rinchen Drub was busy writing the developed Kalachakra text where he described a land to the West called Shambhala - where the King was the Universal Savior that pushed back evil Islam. It's evident that there was a combined effort of complicity from within Hulagu's empire and from without in Tibet, so as to hide Hulagu's identity under the guise of this host of Shams pseudonyms, (used to describe Hulagu's efforts to undermine and subvert Islam within his empire, so as to protect and save the Christians and Buddhists within the empire, and also to slow down the progress of Islam's crushing advance throughout the Middle East and the world). The technique that was used, was for the Buddhists in Tibet to talk about their Buddhist brethren in the Hulagid Empire, using a coded set of names (Shams), so as to hide on one side the identity of Hulagu (more precisely, it was to cover up his hidden side of a person resisting Islam and his work of infiltrating Islam from within.). The incredible thing is that Hulagu sacrificed his own destiny because he was swallowed up by the very forces he combated, Islam, seeing his successors converted to Islam within the fourth generation of rulers of the Hulagid Empire. But by these manifold Shams aliases/pseudonyms we see that in fact Islam was totally subverted by Hulagu and his successors: shaken to it's foundations. But on the other side, the Buddhists and allied friends within Hulagu's empire, were seeding their history with Shams names, so as to enable future searchers like me - and the people reading this thread - to find their way back to the truth so as to understand what Hulagu's heroic and incredible work. Yes, he certainly had been acting like a Resistance Fighter against Islam operating "from within" like an erstwhile French Resistant during WWII... blowing up telephone lines and railways... . This is very much like an Agatha Christie novel, where we have to turn into sleuths that can identify who carried out the deed after a crime. Or else it could be seen as a Dan Brown ("Da Vinci Code") novel or a Matrix script where one has to interpret in a new light, the cryptic clues embedded in the past history. So, concretely, what course must we adopt? I researched the Kalachakra for 45 years, so I've realize that the best course is not the one of circumventing the goal, but rather the direct one that goes straight to the target and hits the center of the target head-on. We see by Hulagu's incredible sacrifice to Islam (his family's successive generations converted to Islam forty years after Hulagu's death) but by his hidden covert work to betray Islam's evil, that he acted like a true Bodhisattva that works for the good of others without looking at his own benefit at all. And he was preparing the Apocalypse and the Final Great War predicted in the Kalachakra between the forces of Believers and Non-Believers. What should we look for to identify that King? If we look for the name Shambhala we should find him, I suppose. OK. Let's do that once again now: indeed, imagine that I want to find the King of Shambhala, how do I go about it? Seeing I'm doing the basic research that anyone would do, I'll act impartially and just let the computer do it's search by itself and let the machine decide. Let's start by searching for Sham. That yields lots of Shams al-Dins. Let's try to see in what way there are some that could have a common link among themselves, and discard the rest.That's basically what I've done: I've gathered a host of half a dozen Shams al-Din and Shams e Tabrizi and analyzed the common traits linking them all together and the result is flamboyant and clear to see. Others should do the same research and follow my footsteps. Because indeed the research I did and the method I adopted, were done in a very innocent, honest, straightforward and impartial way so that no one could say I'd been biased or that it was fake news that I'd made up out of thin air. All the proof I found, has popped up on my screen unprovoked, once I entered the simplest of search words. So, it's the path anyone (even someone with no knowledge at all of Buddhism, of politics or of Tibet) would do. -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
I'm not talking about Bon. Old Bon was a hideous human sacrificing cult and even with a modern ("Sarma" i.e. "new") make-over to copy Buddhism, a. that older Bon is still not criticized, and b. Buddhism is criticized. Bon is a vocal critic of Lord Buddha, who is free-of-mistakes, while Bon is full-of-mistakes, least of which is not it's lack of self-criticism. Period. Bon has no Compassion like Buddhist Compassion and is not perfect such as Lord Buddha. The Shambhala in the Kalachakra that I'm talking about, belongs to Hulagu Khan. He was a shamanic (Tengrist) Buddhist of the Drikung school that converted under his brother Kublai's rule to the then-become-dominant Sakya school. I'd appreciate if those that are monitoring this thread, don't get distracted by heckling and diversive efforts to bring the topic to Bon. I'm concentrating on bringing my research to this thread so that people can be benefited by it. So, that's how I see things and that's how I'm exposing them, so please bear with me and don't pay attention to things that would mire that effort for the onlookers and make my path complicated for me. Thanks to everyone and meet you in Nirvana. Still a couple of Shams personages to relate about here; which crop up in the sources one can find. It's clear that throughout Hulagu's empire someone was going to great pains to populate (and "seed") History with a host of Shams al-Din personages that all played the key roles in Hulagu's dissemination of his controversial ideas that opposed and criticized Islam. I'm hurrying to end this post in order to carry out the goal of Hulagu's mission and get this work on the road. Don't get distracted by other topics. Rush to carry out the work, you too, the onlookers who wish to find Shambhala, like me. Hulagu was a man who infiltrated Islam and operated from inside so as to save the world from the hideous faith of Islam. -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
Are there people interested in the Kingdom of Shambhala here? Don't be distracted by trolls heckling here. Listen carefully and make up your own mind on your own. Look at the facts and examine them calmly in your mind. Meditate upon the meaning of all this. I looked at people with the name of Sham/Shams and came up with several others that lived at the same time and same place as Hulagu, which are really hair-raising. Shams al-Din Muhammad (Nizari imam) in Wikipedia lives in the same area as Hulagu Khan, the latter in Maragheh, and the former in Tabriz, just 50 some km away and at the same time. His page says this: "In Nizari tradition, Shams al-Din is sometimes confused with the earlier mystic Shams Tabrizi (1185–1248)" Now Shams e-Tabrizi and Shams al-Din are thus sometimes confused. But they lived in the same area - Tabriz. Now both share this name of Shams. For Buddhists searching for Shambhala this is striking gold. You don't need to be a scholar to see that Shams and Shambhala are the same word. So there's here clear proof of the name of the King of Shambhala. How could that have come to be? Those two Shams are high personages of Sunnism and (al-Din) of Shiism (of the Agha Khan sect). The only plausible explanation is that the one that wrote the Mongol History wanted to insert Hulagu into the lineage of Muslim groups. And by doing that he was muddying the water for all the sects of Islam, because those are two very controversial groups and labelled and attacked as heretical by the main Muslims sects. Thus by making Hulagu the head of the splittist Sunni Sufis and the controversial Aga Khan Nizari Ismailis, Hulagu Khan's historian was setting the stage for division and war between the Muslim groups and Islam's permanent incapacitation throughout all History. The one that wrote that beginnings of the history of Hulagu, was the one I quoted in an earlier post: it was Shams al-Din Juvayni. He also shared this name of Shams. So my theory is that he was the first one carrying that name, and he wrote the story of the two other Shams so as to split the Muslims among themselves. Indeed, after razing Baghdad, Hulagu's work of wrecking Islam was not over. So as the saying goes: "if you can't beat them, join them". Being overwhelmed by Muslims, Hulagu must have adopted the idea of wrecking Islam from inside and seeding Islam with dissidents. But then again, maybe Juvayni adopted a fake name, which was convenient and symbolical because there had been a third Shams al-Din in that region and at the same time. Indeed, Shams al-Din Muhammad ibn Mahmud Shahrazuri had lived near Hulagu's capital at exactly that time. al-Shahrazuri was a liberal Muslim who worshiped the ancient thinkers. He was thus a dissident and controversial commentator facing the mainstream puritanical Muslims and a perfect battle horse for Hulagu to endorse him against the hard-line Muslims under his empire. So under this name of Shams al-Din, one had a gallery of dissenting voices to mainstream Islam under Hulagu's rule. This was all put into form by the great Historian of the Mongols who came after Juvayni, and who lived for many years after Hulagu and served in all four Mongol kings, Hulagu and three of his dynastic successors. Thus Shams/Shambhala is the rallying cry of opposition to the wildness of Islam's lawlessness. There are several other Shams personages but I suppose they were planted into History to illustrate this opposition that Hulagu and his empire constantly showed to Islam's madness. Shams Tabraiz shows up in Pakistan/Gujarat preaching Islam there a century later. In the course of rewriting history and think they kept using the same system and it still worked one century later. So, Shams Tabrizi was traveling throughout the empire all the say to Pakistan/Gujarat and dying there. SHams Tabrizi has a tomb in Khoy near Hulagu's capital of Margheh, and they claim he's also buried in Gujarat (see link). Shams Tabraiz (missionary) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search Not to be confused with Shams Tabrizi. This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Shams Tabraiz" missionary – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (December 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Shams Tabraiz (died 1356), also known as Shams ud din, was an Ismaili saint in India who preached Islam in the Sindh and Gujarat region of India. He is buried in Kutch. --- The article above says "to not confuse with Shams Tabrizi". But how not to confuse them? They're both called Tabrizi. But also called Shams ud din (which is in fact identical with Shams al-Din.) Furthermore Tabraiz is an Ismaili, like the Aga Khan Shams al-Din. Seeing he's a missionary, I think he traveled from Konya in turkey to the furthest limits of Hulagu's empire on India's borders and in fact he marks the limits of Hulagu's power. He also marks the extent to which Hulagu and his successors marked his Hulagu's territory by spreading this creed that was turning Islam into a battleground of feuding sects. So the Shams incarnations are to be found throughout Hulagu's empire. So Shambhala is the immense empire of Hulagu ranging from Turkey to Pakistan/India and into Tibet. There are still a few Shams that I've identified which need to be mentioned.... There is an important event involving someone called Shams al-Din which was determining for Hulagu's career as the ruler of the Middle East. He was indeed recommended and incited to attack the Nizari Ismailis by someone called Shams al-Din. That was remarkable, because it demonstrated how through his warfare he'd be supported by the locals Muslim dissenting with the Muslims of their area. That would be Hulagu's success in his conquest so that the name of Shams ("Shams al-Din") became his lucky "talisman", in my opinion. Excerpt: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_campaign_against_the_Nizaris#Early_Nizari–Mongol_relations Möngke's decision followed anti-Nizari urges by Sunnis in the Mongol court, new anti-Nizari complaints (such as that of Shams al-Din, qadi of Qazvin), and warnings from local Mongol commanders in Persia. In 1252, Möngke entrusted the mission of conquering the rest of Western Asia to his brother Hülegü, with the highest priority being the conquest of the Nizari state and the Abbasid Caliphate. -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
Nungali, let's stop this here, you're not entitled to any authority on the Mongols, on Shambhala or on Buddhism. You don't speak a word of Tibetan. -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
If one looks at the personages called Shams al-Din, one can honestly think a. that they're Hulagu seeing the dates and places overlap and b. that they're the king of Shambhala for the namesake nature of their Shams and Shambhala names. Look at this man who was alive during Hulagu's life and lived 200 km from Hulagu's capital of Maragheh: This man lived in the region half-way between Hulagu and Baghdad which Hulagu destroyed and razed and also annihilated the Caliph. He was singular among Muslims in that he preserved the heritage of ancient thinkers. Thus his influence was one of tolerance and went against the modern intolerance of Muslims in the world. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Shahrazuri "Shams al-Din Muhammad ibn Mahmud Shahrazuri" Next to Hulagu's capital Maragheh, there is also this other Shams al-Din, at the same time and same place practically: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shams_al-Din_Muhammad_(Nizari_imam) -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
I've got family in Australia in Perth, Norwegian mother's aunt, sheep farming, Albany. Do you know the Nyingma/Ngorpa lama Khyentse Norbu Rinpoche, He's of my Ngor school. He's in Sydney + Mulumbimby. I'd like to know if you'd like to make a new thread about the many names of the King of Shambhala with seven different examples of the name Shams al-Din cropping up in various parts of Hulagu's empire during his reign. These names crop up from Konya in Turkey all the way through to Pakistan and Gujarat at the extreme opposite limits of Hulagu's empire and during his reign. They always speak about the same activity of spreading various sects of Islam within the empire, echoing Hulagu's role as Leader of the Faithful. The people reading this thread are now numbering in the hundred at least, so I think it's time to many branch off into a sub-thread so as to go into deeper detail of my research. People aren't real scholars of Tibetan Buddhism so they're totally dependent upon the results of my research concerning Shambhala (and can't rely on people who don't speak Tibetan and have a very superficial understanding.) So the need for a new more detailed thread is important. You should call it: the seven names of the King of Shambhala in Hulagu Khan's time, which designate him as the Universal Messiah of the world. This is the first post of the new thread: I'm writing this officially as the Royal Norwegian House's contribution to Tibetology, the King of Shambhala Hulagu Khan has seven names in the historical records of the Mongols. This was at the time of the first History of the Mongols so none of the facts recorded there can be trusted nor believed. In our age of fake news and propaganda, the news is manipulated and lies are perpetuated under the guise of being so-called "the truth". From JFK, to 9/11, to the fake COVID pandemic, and the trumped up Ukraine War, nothing can be trusted to be true; so likewise, in the Mongol historical records we can't assert any of it to be true. This is very important because very suspicious details emerge. Particularly, there is mention of a person called Shams al-Din who shows up multiple times in direct association with Hulagu Khan the great Mongol Emperor in the Middle East. As I was searching, earlier this year, (2022) for the entries of Shambhala and king of Shambhala in Google, the hair stood on my head when I happened upon two definitions which I'd missed. Indeed, for the last 45 years, I'd researched all manners of literature and libraries to find the fabled land of Shambhala. For the last twenty years,, I'd always been directed towards the Buddhist websites of the Kalachakra when searching for the words Shambhala and King of Shambhala. But seeing that the same websites were still there, the same as twenty years ago, (and because I had learnt to go against the search engines that try to force you to search in one way or another, and try to hinder your liberty,) I decided that I should leave the search engines behind and go out to search on my own without the search engine peering over my shoulder whenever I was on a computer. So, instead of searching for the Buddhist Shambhala, I took back my liberty and decided to search what the meaning of the Sham was instead. Bingo, I found the word Sham in Middle eastern Arabic. I had thus found the meaning outside of Buddhism and it was linked to a land called Bilad al-Sham. But I still hadn't found the King of Shambhala. And Bilad al-Sham was a land that had that name since Antiquity with hundreds of kings.... A Google search turned up many people named Sham/Shams. First there was one called Shams al-Din who lived near Hulagu at the same time and could easily be a clone of Hulagu... an alias or a pseudo of Hulagu's and thus provide the proof that Hulagu's the king of Shambhala. I'd like for people to be judge and look for themselves. Is this person a. Hulagu and b. the King of Shambhala? -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
Hulagu Khan died right next to Maragha, his capital, in Iranian Azerbaijan, a beautiful mountain valley. Excerpt: " Death[edit] Hulagu Khan fell seriously ill in January 1265 and died the following month on the banks of Zarrineh River (then called Jaghatu) and was buried on Shahi Island in Lake Urmia. His funeral was the only Ilkhanate funeral to feature human sacrifice.[28] His tomb has never been found.[29] Legacy[edit] Hulagu Khan laid the foundations of the Ilkhanate and thus paved the way for the later Safavid dynastic state, and ultimately the modern country of Iran. Hulagu's conquests also opened Iran to both European influence from the west and Chinese influence from the east. This, combined with patronage from his successors, would develop Iran's distinctive excellence in architecture. Under Hulagu's dynasty, Iranian historians began writing in Persian rather than Arabic.[30] It is recorded however that he converted to Buddhism as he neared death,[31] against the will of Doquz Khatun.[32] The erection of a Buddhist temple at Ḵoy testifies his interest in that religion.[3] Recent translations of various Tibetan monks' letters and epistles to Hulagu confirms that he was a lifelong Buddhist, following the Kagyu school.[33] Hulagu also patronized Nasir al-Din Tusi and his researches in Maragheh observatory. Another of his proteges were Juvayni brothers Ata Malik and Shams al-Din Juvayni. His reign as the ruler of Ilkhanate was peaceful and tolerant to diversity.[34] " ========================= I say I have friends that are Bonpo...what's strange about that? My teacher at university's husband Samten Karmay is a famous Bonpo. So? Bonpo's still not compatible in it's principle. I know communists very well, and love my friends very dearly, but still don't agree with them. I don't go around hating my dear friends Nungali. Jean-Luc Achard from Paris University INALCO, isn't just Bonpo, he's also Nyingma and I'm his friend no matter what he thinks. That's normal in France. It means "being tolerant". It's a big French thing in France. ======= You see this Shams al-Din Juvayni, in the excerpt above: this is one in a series of many Shams al-Dins that lived in the same area and same period as Hulagu. It's as if there's an epidemic of FAMOUS Shams al-Dins. They're all closely related to Hulagu or to his career. I'm of the opinion that these are seeded into his biography posthumously and on purpose. The purpose is to trace his influence and explain the alliances that were underlined inside his empire between Hulagu and his many Muslim allies. I'm of the opinion that the name of Shambhala was specifically created so as to explain Hulagu's fusional empire of mixing infinite alliances of peoples and creeds within an empire the scale of which was never seen in that region nor in the world. Hulagu died once he had been defeated by his cousin Berke, who drastically reduced Hulagu's power. But multiple alliances with the Muslims of the Hulagid Empire set in place during the eighty years of the Hulagid Empire. That's all described by the name of Shambhala, as I just explained above. (and the fact that one finds the name of Shams al-Din everywhere in Hulagu's biography and the history of his empire) There's also a lawyer called Shams al-Din who traveled to meet Hulagu as his court when he was still marching to invade Iran, and that Shams convinced Hulagu to attack the Assassin Sect at Alamut. So there are at least three Shams al-Dins that play decisive and determining roles in Hulagu's career. It's no simple coincidence those names have to be seeded into his biography for that to be explainable. History is not a factual art, it's written by the victors to honor and glorify their leaders with fake news. Unless one understands that, one doesn't understand how History is written. -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
Politics no. Drikung Kagyu dominated Tibet until Hulagu's brother Kublai came to power when the third brother Mongke died. At that point the Chinese power under Kublai endorsed Sakya as the state religion. Drikung took a nose-dive, and it's temple at Drikung was burned by a Chinese general under the Sakyas' instructions. Hulagu in Iran was more or less abandoned due to that and reverted to obeying Sakya and his brother Kublai. The Tangs under Kublai extended their power over Tibet but an off-shoot of Sakya (my school of Ngor) decided to colonize an ancient Hulagu territory to the West of Tibet and thus dropped out of the China/Sakya system. It thus was that that offshoot passed over to Hulagu and colonized an ancient Drikung area. That Drikung/Sakya area is a like a lawless border tract where there's no clear ruler and no clear rule of any law. It's like a wild border town. It's Hulagu's last outpost towards Tibet. In Tibet, you can Google it it's called Ngari - Purang - Lo Mantang (Mustang). As for Bonpo, my teacher at university was Heather Stoddard who's husband Samten Karmay is a Bonpo. Many co-students were Bonpo such a Jean-Luc Achard. Many wee Namhkai Norbu (Giuseppe Tucci's assistant;) followers and he's part-Bonpo. I'm not at odds with Bonpo. But Shambhala's not Bonpo. I have no proof leading to that. That's all. -
Marpa: the tantric origins of the Kagyu tradition
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Apech's topic in Buddhist Discussion
TheGrayJediKnight Hi, hello. -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
What does this "Tong Sal Soung Jouk" mean, Nungali? Honestly? Left out the "Tong Sal Soung Jouk". Too bad, right? I'm sad at being made to look silly. Very. སྟོང་་གསལ་ཟུང་གཇུག། Do you speak and read Tibetan, Nungali? I don't want to get carried away by this confrontation of POVs with Nungali. It's a lot of posturing nothing else. There are people at Dao Bums who'll want to move on I guess and want to look at the whole picture and not just the small picture. So to get back to the subject, Hulagu's the candidate for Messiah and King of Shambhala for several reasons. The land of Shambhala as Bilad al-Sham fits perfectly because when Hulagu invaded the Middle East he as a Buddhist was invading an ancient Buddhist land. Buddhism was the main religion in the Parthian and Sassanid periods. It was so also during the Hellenisitic period following Alexander. So, be it in for example Bamyan or in the Balkh area north of Afghanistan, Hulagu was treading upon holy old Buddhist ground. Hulagu fits the description of the King of Shambhala given in the Kalachakra. That description says he fights to defend Buddhism against Islam, and Hulagu did that by razing Baghdad and then incarnating saints within the Muslim line of masters. When Hulagu fights Islam in Baghdad, as a powerful ruler, what he takes with one hand he gives back with the other. So once ha had razed Baghdad, so as to give back something to Muslims, he created a persona of a messianic candidate of both Sunnism and Shiism's sects. Therefore he was setting the stage for the Sunnites and Shiites to be pitted against each other for centuries of feuding. But also he was setting them up for a final revelation and Apocalypse wherein he'd return as both their messiahs. I studied the career of the founder of Sakya called Birwapa/Virupa. His career was much like Hulagu's which was that he destroyed the opponents to Buddhism. By destroying Islam implantation in the Middle East, Hulagu was paving the way for a harmonious reentrance of Islam into a civilized world under a renewed and peaceful, changed appearance with no more threats, wars and criminal behavior. Birwapa's battle was against the heretical hindus and their bloody sacrifices, and his work was to convert the Hindus to Buddhism. Likewise Hulagu's battle was to convert Muslims to a loving and compassionate behavior. Islam's Hindu influence in their Kaaba Stone, (which was a Hindu idol before becoming an Islamic one,) shows by Allah being illustrated by the moon's crescent, which is Shiva's symbol. So, just as Birwapa converted the evils of Hinduism to the beneficial faith of Buddhism, Hulagu also converted Islam towards goodness by force and then by cunning, by infiltrating the Islamic creed by the personas of "Shams" ...that Hulagu incarnated in the messianic lineage of Islam. Hulagu was basically a shamanic faithful, of the traditional Mongol "Tengri" sky-god's faith. But he had chosen Buddhism as his personal faith while he wrote that he liked and favored Christians. So throughout Hulagu's life, he carried out the instructions given to him by his brother Mongke Khan to submit or destroy the Muslim rebellions in the Middle East, using the most fearsome means to do so. The Kalachakra says "the King of Shambhala uses terrifying weapons". But he was given the name of Shambhala due to his double faith of Buddhism and Tengrism, seeing Tengrism is the same god, (the Mongols' "Tengri") as Baal the ancient Semitic sky-god. thus the name of Shambhala the anagram of Baalshamin, one of Baal's names. Thus by the name of Shambhala (Sham meaning "Sun") we see the profile of the King of Shambhala who mixes 1. his ancient faith of shamanic and wild Tengrism (sky-god/Sun) with 2. the old faiths of Semitic Middle East that go back to the Bronze Age, (Baal, sky-god/Sun) with 3. the age-old Buddhist faith implanted into the Middle east since Antiquity, mixed with 4. the new Vajrayana Buddhism of the Tibetans and Mongols which Hulagu had converted to as well. This sun-god Sky-god Shambhala is thus in conflict with the Moon-god Allah/Shiva. Shiva is also the god who captures the Ganges River in his matted-hair (via the moon in his hair which captures the Ganges). The sage Birwapa, not only destroys the Moon-god Shiva's linga/phallic idols, by shattering them, but he also stops the sun's course in the sky by a mudra-gesture (the "conjuration mudra") towards the sky. Thus the King of Shambhala has the attributes of the Sun-god Baal who is a burning furnace of fire, but that Sun symbol is stopped in mid-air by the power of the yogi Birwapa. Thus we see that the moderation of the force of yogic Shiva, manages to appease the furnace of Islam's fierce heat, which is what Hulagu did, by alternating fearsome force and loving compassion towards the good people of his realm. I'm maybe also related to the King of Norway, seeing a man from Holmestrand in Norway married into the royals. He has the same name as my family. We're Lorentzens but we're from a Tønsberg branch, just fifty km from Holmestrand, so we're without doubt of the same family. The reason is that Holmestrand and Tønsberg are both on the Oslo Fjord facing the ocean, both are small-town ports, they boat up and down the coast every day, they're sister cities and the same people live in both places. In our grandparents time the populations were very small, with a few thousand at best. Holmestrand is at the foot of high cliffs facing the fjord so the only way in and out is along the waterline which leads straight to Tønsberg. this all to say that the two cities Lorentzens are closely related by multiple kin. So not only is our family part of the Royal Court (great aunt Else Werring was Chief Court Mistress) but also most certainly directly related to the King himself. This is an important topic and it's not to self-aggrandize or to say that my finding Shambhala is due to being of royal and aristocratic extraction. It's easy to lampoon and pooh pooh the royals and privileged class, but throughout Scandinavia the royals have had a decisive influence upon the life in society and advancing new trends and influences and thinking. For example, family members such as Victoria in England marked the Victorian Age, Elisabeth II marked the pop age and Hare Krishna cult, but more recently the Danish Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Peter_of_Greece_and_Denmark) was a Tibetologist. And it was because of his founding Tibet Committees throughout Scandinavia that the Dalai Lama was bestowed the Nobel Peace Prize with all the fallout and positive feedback that has created throughout the world and that continues to spread and have repercussions even today. So the effects and results of the royal family being involved in the great new innovative and progressive spread of ideas within society is not a laughing matter. And their patient and steadfast influence upon ideas is both groundbreaking and impressive. The massive scale at which their ideas impact society, cannot be easily estimated. That's why I want to make many videos here, via Skype, and spread the finite details of the research I've done, so that everybody can be acquainted with these ideas worldwide, in every stratus of society. Indeed, the time has come to spread the news of finding Shambhala by my strenuous study of the Kalachakra and thus, the work carried out to reward the Dalai Lama and spread awareness of Tibet's plight through the Nordic Tibet Committees, is now over. Now is the time for the hard-core of the spiritual path where we can find the real Nirvana of the Land of Shambhala and the true King of Shambhala so as to reveal them to everybody worldwide. The Christian, Jewish, Buddhist Apocalypse is upon us now and Islam can also now atone for it's evil, leave=ing behind it's savagery and thus return to the kindness of the folds of a civilized society. -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
Nungali, I speak Tibetan, you don't. You suppose Shambhala is Olmolungri of the Bonpo. And/or the ancient Budddhist lands of Central Asia. No. Bon and Buddhism are very different and Bon is not compatible with Buddhism. (Cannibalism and human sacrifice? Bon is the early form for Daesh.) Your so-called Shambhala doesn't jell well at all. I'll explain why my Shambhala is right and your's is wrong. People at this forum should rally fast around the Shambhala that I've found: the real one. I'm qualified not Nungali but I respect others' opinions.. སྟོང་་གསལ་ཟུང་གཇུག། What does this "Tong Sal Soung Jouk" mean, Nungali? Honestly? -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
I want to add solemnity to the following post, in so much as I'm related to a Royal Mistress of the Robes of Norway, Else Werring and to Nils Werring, her husband, a member of the Steering Committee of the Bilderberg group. This is thus an official publication to a definitely certain degree. I'd like to tell you people about how I found Shambhala: when I found this land of Bilad al-Sham that I mentioned above, seeing it overlapped with Hulagu Khan's empire I felt comforted in my theory that the King of Shambhala might be Hulagu Khan. Indeed, this all served to further convince me that the Tibetan Kalachakra text was helping to reveal the King of Shambhala and that I should keep on trusting the Tibetan source of Kalachakra. So, I just shifted my focus from finding a land to finding a man instead. Seeing I was searching for the King of Shambhala, I selected among the results, people called Sham, and among those people, I selected the ones that had dates close to Hulagu's Khan's dates. Hulagu's dates are 1218-1256. The dates for two people named Shams (Shams-e Tabrizi and Shams al-Din) were exactly the same as Hulagu's dates. Not only that but the biographies showed they lived exactly where Hulagu lived so there was no mistake possible. The two Shams personas were obviously aliases/of Hulagu's. And the reason that this could have existed must have been that 1. the Tibetans writing the Kalachakra must have been in communication with the person writing the Mongols historical records in Iran, so that 2. they could agree that the name of Shambhala should correspond to various names of the land Hulagu lived in and 3. that there should be created personas using the name Shams mirroring Hulagu's biography. My problem was the bring all these loose ends together. In the fashion of a detective investigating a case, I had to find the motivations and the modus operandi of the actors of Hulagu's history. It meant that the writing of Hulagu's history in Iran had to have an inside source who contributed to mirroring the version written in the Kalachakra in Tibet eighty years after Hulagu's death. It so happens that there was one person who famously wrote the first world history who served both Hulagu and several of his descendants at the help of the "Hulagid" Empire was named Rashid al-Din. So this was the person who could have done that writing, and was the only person possible for that role. So, my hypothesis was then that the Mongols and their Tibetan gurus had set up a pact to rewrite history in it's entirety so as to fit and honor the glory which they wanted to surround Hulagu with. It was a made-up story from A to Z, like a false flag straight out of American history where the government sells any kind of fake news to the gullible and sheeple-style public. But I've seen this happen with my own eyes,and didn't put this past he Mongols at all. Julius Caesar was famous for writing his own history and claiming he was related personally to the gods. Stalin and Hitler were also good at this game and wrote their own histories glorifying themselves with qualities which were totally invented and that they had never had. Mao Tse Tung was also good at making up fake news about his own glory. But with the two Shams figures, Hulagu had been very generous in his work, and had used the personas of founders of the Muslim sunnite and shiite sects. They are both the future messiahs of each sect and are thus in competition with each other. Hulagu was thus pitting the Muslims against each other by inserting himself into the lineage of their founders. Like a Forrest Gump-figure, he was inserting himself into the most famous figures of his own peoples' faiths. So just as there are family secrets that people don't know about and discover that someone they hate is in fact their father for example, in the same way, both sunnites and shiites will be surprised to find out that Hulagu who was a fervent Buddhist, inserted himself into their line of Messianic forerunners. And they'll discover that the one who wrote this invented history was Rashid al-Din, a Jew. In this way, Hulagu had rigged the whole history and narrative of the Buddhist, the Muslim the Christian and Jewish histories of the whole world. Christians he liked and set himself up as their Messiah, he the Buddhist, who was on the brink of becoming (eighty years later when the Kalachakra was to be composed in Tibet.) the Messiah of Buddhism, the King of Shambhala. Hulagu set himself up as the Muslim rivaling Sunnite and Shiite messiahs: Hulagu set himself up as both the sects' messianic forerunners, thus priming up Islam for centuries and centuries of conflict and in-fighting among themselves (which would be the way of freeing the other faiths of hideous Islam...as indeed, this protection of all faiths against Islam was the goal Hulagu had set for himself when he razed Baghdad. This work of totally, perfectly preserving the planet against Islam's ravages, once and for all, by this subtle, hidden, later-to-be-revealed miracle of producing aliases of himself under the guise of people with the names of Shams, reverted back to the reference in the Kalachakra of the mention of that name of Shams through the name of the Kingdom of Shambhala. That the name of Shambhala is found in Hulagu's ihstory under the form of the Shams personages that represent Islam's two sects, shows that the important message of the Kalachakra is the total obliteration by Hulagu of Islam by pitting it's two sects against each other in an eternal battle to the end. Hulagu therefore embodies that englightened and compassionate protection against the evils of Islam. I've written this very important and hair-raising post so as to mark this historical moment when the truth of all the faiths in the world is revealed. I solemnly end this post here and wish it be spread everywhere immediately. I'll make videos to explain this further and repeat the various parts of my posts in this thread and post the links here. G.S. -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
Do you see things as simpler? On one hand, it's complicated because I suppose that the Tibetans were not telling Blavatsky and Roerich much about Shambhala and were simply leading them on with clues and suggestions. The Kalachakra/Shambhala are Tantras, so they're are not allowed to be revealed to non-initiates. If one has not received the Kalachakra empowerment, one is not authorized to communicate on the topic of Shambhala. Basically, what the Theosophs were spreading about Shambhala/Agartha/"Hollow Earth" were non-initiates' nonauthorized versions of their supposed understandings of Shambhala. But they garnered boundless speculation and admiration in the West. Hollywood's replete with spin-offs from Theosophy in the whole "aliens/Matrix-style" filmography. But things get simpler in understanding Shambhala in my opinion, when the political equilibrium between the Mongol brothers, Hulagu, and Kublai Khans, is explained in the stark geo-political terms of the times. (even if those who don't know politics in Tibet, are lost between understanding Drikung and Sakya. But those are the most important themes which I'd like to develop in fine detail and make videos about, so as to put the vids online.... because it's the crux of the Tibetan situation and also through Tibet, of world strategy between religions and geographical and political blocs across the world from East to West, extending from Konya in Turkey well into the Tibetan land of Western Tibet - as far as Mongol Hulagu Khan's Empire is concerned, even until today...his ancient dominion of Ngari in Tibet includes the valley of Mustang (tib. Lo Mantang.) which is still outside Beijing's grasp and just over the Tibetan border, it's a valley that preserves Hulagu's Drikung - Sakya messianic Shambhala message to the world.). Now what one sees in meditation - remains in meditation, seeing it's beyond words and unspeakable. It's not simple nor complex, nor is it this nor that. It's clear light and empty, and both of them at the same time. Empty, clear light, the two undifferentiated. སྟོང་་གསལ་ཟུང་གཇུག། -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
Lairg, There are very many layers of understanding of the truth. The Theosophical Society that Nicolas Roerich was part of, were the great propagators of the Shambhala mythology in the West. Speaking Tibetan is very important to find Shambhala. Nobody at the Theosophical Society spoke Tibetan but Blavatsky and Roerich were both in contact with Tibetans or Mongols-Buriats. In Astrakan, Blavatsky (who was a native of Dnipro in Ukraine) was in contact with the Tibetan-Buddhist Kalmukhs who's lamas speak Tibetan. Blavatsky's explanations of Shambhala are very approximate but were very advanced for the time in the West. Blavatsky's birth in central Ukraine, resonates very eerily with the Mongols' advance and conquest of the Middle East and Russia, because in the 13th century, the exact same regions were invaded by the Mongols. (Hulagu Khan had his capital in Azerbaijan, just 500 km approx. from Ukraine). Thus the Russians/Ukrainians like Blavatsky are a fertile soil for spreading the creed of Shambhala seeing they are themselves descendants of those same Mongols. Thanks to Blavatsky and later Roerich, the creed of Shambhala was spread to the West: even if it was in a more or less twisted form. Because they were confronted with the barrier of the Tibetan language, the Theosophs invented the myth of Agartha and "Hollow Earth" which are just illustrations or allegories for Shambhala. The real understanding of Shambhala must come from the knowledge of the authors in Tibetan of the Kalachakra which are primarily Buton Rinchen Drub. That was a challenge that was beyond the grasp of Roerich and Blavatsky seeing they didn't master the Tibetan language. I attended the Tibetan temple of Ngor Ewam Phendé Ling in Normandy; France for fifty years and was co-disciple alongside Nelly Kaufman, the head of the French Theosophical Society (Adyar). So Kaufman's presence at the feet of Tibetan lamas, meant that the Theosophs were acutely aware of the need to rejuvenate and update constantly their information from the original Tibetan source. They understood that the Tibetans were working out of a vastly more educated and knowledgeable body of literature and understanding than was available to Theosophy in the West. But the spreading of the myth of Shambhala worldwide, uniformly, was due to Russian/Ukrainian Blavatsky and Roerich. And they can truly be thanked for that much. Taking the research further requires both meditation and study in Tibetan. -
Finding Shambhala: Just 3 Easy Steps There.
Jamyang Khedrup replied to Jamyang Khedrup's topic in Buddhist Discussion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mistress_of_the_Robes The Mistress of Robes is concretely the hostess of the court who decides what are to be the roles of precedence at the court. Excerpt: Formerly responsible for the queen consort’s/regnant’s clothes and jewellery (as the name implies), the post now has the responsibility for arranging the rota of attendance of the ladies-in-waiting on the queen, along with various duties at state ceremonies. My great uncle Nils Werring sat on the Steering Committee of the Bilderberg Group. Yes, about what you wrote, concerning the information you sent me, and which I read. Yes, if you look at the Buddhist kingdoms to the West of Tibet Buddhism flourished in the Middle East and Central Asia. It's surprising to see it from Bamiyan, (which I visited prior to it being blown up - in 1975) to the Sassanids in Iran etc....Buddhism was everywhere. Alexander's Satrap successors in Kazakhstan etc.. were fervent Buddhists and created the Gandhara-Buddhist style. But my answer is in what you wrote just above: you say ' he who defeats the King of Baghdad' is about the King not the place itself'. Yes, you're right and that gives the key right there. I've done 45 years of research on this so I'm familiar with these ways of using the words and I know that there are many entries into the truth. When you say it's about the King, not the place, well yes and no. The King and his kingdom are the same thing. Who defeated the king of Baghdad, in the Kalachakra? It's the King of Shambhala. So, you see the Kingdom of that ruler is named right there. So, you and others are looking for a kingdom called Shambhala that you imagine in one place or another but haven't situated it yet. But I've situated it you see. How do I situate it? Knowing the Kalachakra gives us the key naming the kingdom as Shambhala, I don't try to find Shambhala on my own by my study of various texts or publications, instead I stick to the strict content given by the Kalachakra. As I said above, you should look at the land called Bilad al-Sham. You said that my time period was off, but not with Bilad al-Sham because it designates a land that has it's origin in the prehistoric times. Google Bilad al-Sham/ go ahead. That's Shambhala. It's the same name as Shambhala, you can see that. Why did the Tibetans choose this name of Shambhala? It's because Hulagu's Empire overlaps and includes Bilad al-Sham in it. Do you know what Sham means? You see you're going about things backward. I rely upon the clues given by the holy Kalachakra text. You're going by your own hunches and impressions. But in Buddhism you've got to meditate in order to gain an inspiration coming from a higher influence which is not part of your limited intellect but rests upon vast space. You shouldn't say that Hulagu Khan doesn't refer to the Bronze Age and old Antiquity. Indeed, the name of Shambhala is magical because it's the anagram of a famous God of the Middle East which is Baal. The name of the god is Baalshamin. You see the mongols were subverters who's mission was to overthrow, and overcome. Hulagu's mission was to destroy everything that came before him and possess it body and soul. You can compare him to taking the war spoils such as the troops did in WWII and which one also saw in the US Civil War when the North took over all the possessions of the South. So Hulagu waged a military war but also a spiritual war where he took over all the gods of the people he defeated and incarnated those gods himself. American cowboys did the same by wearing the scalps of Indians they killed on their belts. Hulagu was a gruesome warrior and killer but also a fervent Buddhist of the Drikung Kagyu school but his gruesome heritage was taken over by the Sakyas. It was later purified into a deified form by Ngorchen Kunga Zangpo who totally pushed back the military aspect of Hulagu and turned him into the world Savior of the Kalachakra. I've explained this in my first post for reference. I don't think there's anything left to error here and that each aspect has been amply dealt with, in full detail.