-
Content count
786 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Everything posted by SeekerOfHealing
-
What author of this thread expect from this forum? To find old bearded immortal who lived 800 years? We are all regular people. We eat, drink and shit, have sex (at least some of us.) and do regular things. No human in this era can teach you about Dao, there are no living immortals or buddhas - they are very high leveled practitioners tho. If you want to study - study with spirits of the Dao who are here to help you on different level. Read my thread when I'm speaking about celestial scroll and initiate yourself so you will get into learning directly from immortals. Do not waste time on human as they are not higher then you and you are not higher then them.
-
Realizations are limited to their own traditions. You are believing fairy teals and hearsays about this and that and beliving it by conclusions. You do not know those people if they are really realized or not. Only Buddhism can enlighten you or real neidan.
-
99% of Tai Chi are fake. True Tai chi have alchemical results and principles (neidan)
-
No true. Jhana will arise when the condition is right for it to arise and other then proper meditation (aka either one-pointed jhana or twim jhana) it will arise - other practices do not lead to jhanas or not all practices lead to jhanas. Jhanas appear only when mind is super focused or super relaxed not other way around.
-
There are real tai chi styles for internal power but those are rare and not know to public. I know and have instructions for that one style actually.
-
Prerequisites for enlightenment (if any)
SeekerOfHealing replied to s1va's topic in General Discussion
Yep. You can not really convert to buddhism are you are born buddhist as you have a mind and that's all you need to become buddhist, but moment of convertion is actually when you start investigating the mind consciously and moment you understand that mind is determining factor of our existence, feeling of how we are etc. (or how the skandhas/aggregates are) Before speaking about buddhism learn this.- 146 replies
-
- enlightenment
- qualification
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
No. I study TCM and I do not need any liver healing. I do not feel pain not pleasure on this stage anymore. The world is suffering but you didn't experience "dukkha" really. All of you trying to "convert" me and others to your own ideas which are generally false and creates more suffering - this is disease which need to be cured. Spreading virus of ignorance and trying to take on others. What matters is truth in life. You trying to make up things in your mind like cheap psychiatry telling yourself that it's gonna be okay, believing this and that, making up ideas about self, no self just to run away from life rather then directly see things the way they are. Do not try defend women as inferior - they are failure, but just relative failure. Do not try defend world, rotten fruit still have some sweetness in it but it's rotten and needs to be discarded - no normal person would try to find excuse to keep rotten fruit because of little sweetness there. There is no point for me to be here really and express myself in conversation as my level is much beyond understanding of regular people and much away for people to grasp what I'm taking here. I guess why people on that level goes into solitude to finish the work and elixir as one step they are beyond the world as they seen everything here and knows everything how things are without being delusional about world, women, men or whatever dynamics of taji. What is obvious for me (and directly seen) it's seems to be controversial for you. What I said here can be directly seen or experienced - it's not intellectual idea. Most people here trying to convert back and forth to those ideas they believe without realizing that they are all empty. It's seems liberation is only for those who can actually see that.
-
Prerequisites for enlightenment (if any)
SeekerOfHealing replied to s1va's topic in General Discussion
Of course I do not care. I'm only realizing how spiritual people are getting more stupid and stupid and more entangled in the concepts thinking they getting somewhere. I wanted to share some valuable experiences for genuine seekers but all I see are people who are destined to die ignorant and still neglect their stupidity taking it as a kind of wisdom. First you need to understand that none of you are showing any sings of understanding of reality, just recycling concepts again and again without any benefit for yourself and others. It's like eating someone poop and taking delight in this. Disgusting. Atman, not atman, self, not self. Puke. Start questioning all those concepts not following them and then maybe you will get somewhere.- 146 replies
-
- enlightenment
- qualification
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Prerequisites for enlightenment (if any)
SeekerOfHealing replied to s1va's topic in General Discussion
Bunch of bs and feces.- 146 replies
-
- enlightenment
- qualification
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Discussing Reincarnation
SeekerOfHealing replied to noonespecial's topic in Esoteric and Occult Discussion
You guys speaking you do not know about. Like akashic records and stuff like this - lol. You can actually see not reincarnation but rebirth directly in meditation states and it's much different that what you are speaking here, that by Buddha said "hold up, there is no reincarnation" as hindus and other new agers have not enough insight to really see what going on. -
yeah. if you interested in wasting your precious lifetime into cannabis smoking and shamanry that's fine but if you interested in genuine realization then cannabis is inferior. Mingmen of genuine cultivator is different then in regular person that why he or she will never smoke cannabis, take drugs or drink alcohol (beside alchemical wines)
-
It does not matter that you can quote something. I can quote bible but it does not matter that god exists. You level of understanding "true nature" (which do not exists) is on the same level so if you know true nature you would not ask how you need to prove it as it would be obvious. Check mate. Do not base your philosophy on such mindplay-bs as you will be suffer a lot in life. They actually love me more then ever. I would say with gynocentric state of mind I was like everybody, but now I'm "different" to them (I'm not abusive of course but I can see thru their nature) and they naturally become submissive as they unconsciously know that I know their secret. It's great fun and love (as long as you do not mention those topics but just understand for yourself as it's men oriented knowledge and for men, not for women). As I'm not interested in women for pretty long time now it's just fun to watch monkey run for banana, but I think I'm getting used to it so much I do not play with their hypergamy and other aspects as much as I could or do. Women are waste of time if you see thru their image and make up "of divinity, compassion" it's actually on reverse unless they are hardly pressed by life or patriarchy, when she have no rights to vote and other stuff then women are beautiful creature (because they must be under pressure of society). Now they can just run around, have privilege of women (and men) without any responsibility. They do not pay taxes at ALL and have all the benefits which men work for them etc. which makes society collapse and one way or another we would move back to the patriarchal aspects because women do not know how to handle their new societal freedom as evolution do not make them ready as thru milion of years they would be put into inferior position it will not change with couple laws or equality movements - women need and yearn to be inferior in position to find self actualization in that which was pushed thru 2 milions of years of evolution. So I love my lifestyle but I'm not failure in life and I can self actualize myself in very much roles so paradoxically the less important women are the more they want be around me and the more of them gather which shows how logicless creatures they are. If you analyze women nature clearly you will just laugh with each strike of insight into that. It's just funny and I'm feel blessed that I'm free from looking of self actualization in women appreciation or women emotions. If you come to that level then you will know.
-
The Best Kept Secret of Life
SeekerOfHealing replied to wong chee kwan's topic in General Discussion
You know nothing about I Ching. If you would know I ching you would be master of this planet. -
Prerequisites for enlightenment (if any)
SeekerOfHealing replied to s1va's topic in General Discussion
Even Buddha discarded hindu teachings as failure so (as all other spiritual process come from india then... all other teachings are failure). Why pushing so hard on that point while you have someone who practiced it all and said it's all bs?- 146 replies
-
- enlightenment
- qualification
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
No. Thinking that "the one thing that distances us from liberation is the judging mind" is the judging mind. It's make no sense and any practical thing. It's actually cycle (samsara). It's not pointing out to liberation. There is no distance in liberation as such. The only thing that there are between taji and wuji are fetters. and no we do not have any true nature, and we not having the same thing. We are most divided species on the planet. Creating invisible and conceptual "true nature" which you can not prove of existence will only divide people more and more. Equality comes from diversity (and trying to equal you are actually dividing) Prove me wrong then. Saying that something is this and that you need to be proving beside stating opinion - otherwise it's just bs and fairytales. Women have not power on it's own and will never have. Men (beta males) just allowed women to vote and anything like that. It's men choice to set what is for women to be as men are builders of civilization and everything - and this is how it is. Prove me wrong if I'm not right in argumentative approach rather then speaking "political correctly" bs to flatter women.
-
It's not showing my hurt as I'm not hurting anybody by seeing things the way they are. You are unable to cope with the truth of woman nature so you logic is according to emotions not to the reality of women nature. It's like you wanna see your boss always beautiful good and not negative to not lose your position in his/her eyes. The only thing I'm showing here is disappoint feelings, especially when women try to point out their equality, women power (lol, which is anyway lend by men) and how fake it is if you look closer at it matter. That's up to you, but what you saying is not true it's just your opinion based on your confusion and your self explanatory failure. I'm fully okay with nature of women as I'm not expecting from pig to fly or from bull to make a milk curds.
-
yes. but she is no longer women then here is explanation. You seem to not understand nature of what it's said and point but attaching enlightenment mind with women which is misunderstanding (and so with men too). Once the Buddha was seated under a tree in the meditation posture, his senses calmed, his mind quiet, and attained to supreme control and serenity. Then a Brahmin, Dona by name, approached the Buddha and asked: "Sir, will you be a god, a deva?" "No, brahmin." "Sir, will you be a heavenly angel, a gandhabba?" "No, brahmin." "Sir, will you be a demon, a yakkha?" "No, brahmin." "Sir, will you be a human being, a manussa?" "No, brahmin." "Then, sir, what indeed will you be?" "Brahmin, whatever defilements (âsavas) there be owing to the presence of which a person may be identified as a god or a heavenly angel or a demon or a human being, all these defilements in me are abandoned, cut off at the root, made like a palm-tree stump, done away with, and are no more subject to future arising. "Just as, brahmin, a blue or red or white lotus born in water, grows in water and stands up above the water untouched by it, so too I, who was born in the world and grew up in the world, have transcended the world, and I live untouched by the world. Remember me as one who is enlightened (Buddhoti mam dhârehi brâhmana)." I'm not in favor of buddhism or anything as it's got nothing to do with such vulgar way of expressing teachings. Favoring is based on ignorance. whatever truth there is whatever is explained by taoism or buddhism it does not matter as truth is not subjective matter but the things the way they are in reality and that's what genuine cultivator need to seek. Whatever truth be bold and harsh (like women will never love you etc.) we need to seek those things and see reality the way it is.
-
Prerequisites for enlightenment (if any)
SeekerOfHealing replied to s1va's topic in General Discussion
This is what I said, you judge before putting things into your mouth so you will never know and basing judgement based on me about some meditation is also ignorant approach. Just try it and then we can talk about it - otherwise it's just smearing faces without any point behind but if you are aim is only aimlessly talk here - i'm fine with that too. and yes, there is only one way and one method which is blessing for those who seek simplicity and curse for those who like playing with toys (and endlessly look for result even if they keep missing more and more into the point). I have no need to promote it. It's just a mention in contrastic way - you do whatever you want to do. If you think you are more experienced then me and knowledgeable to say "all paths are the same and everyone points to the same results" - you need to prove those claims otherwise it's just hypocrisy at it finest. You need to practice all those paths to prove all those paths are the same. you have to need the same results etc. etc. etc. so please do not speak aimlessly sameism doctrine without any substance behind.- 146 replies
-
- enlightenment
- qualification
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
I wish it could happen but it will not happen as women have no biological function to love beyond their own biological responses. Here is explanation of this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6o1tGuc8fYo also Hypergamy of women do not let love men really unless it's fits in her biology before she can love him. There is also adaptation problem which nervous system is quickly to adopt into emotions like love, happiness and make them impermanent. That's why it's better to enter jhanas and meditation states as they are beyond five sense and happiness is true. It's happiness without any interests and love without any condition. That's why Buddha and other said leave women behind - it's clear for anybody who "been there and done that". Even you response is just emotional without any argument to hide and silence the truth about true women nature which is inferior (but NOT BAD and which not means that you are bad person as person)
-
Men outside is ugly or coarse or brute because inside is fluffy puffy. Everybody knows ways of yin and yang knows this as it's basic. You can not hoax women biology. For her you are disposable nothing more and you call it love or some other stories when you feel her poison. It's just nature and biological play of yin and yang, you can not do anything about that. You will never be loved the way you want to or your nature yearn for it as it's not possible for women to do that and it's not her role. As long as you are disposable for her and beneficial she will be giving you feeling of love as kind of addiction or poison/drug, then when you will be extracted from all yang (money, health, sperm etc.) then you will be dumped for another one. It's just the nature works - whatever you think otherwise it's just you story which will be crushed by reality as soon as you enter very close relationship with women. Those who thinks otherwise are unattractive beta males who actually do not have opportunity to gather a lot of yin (and do not know how to do that) so they thinking highly of women. True nature of women is very low but it's actually very powerful in gynocentrism because men gave that power to women and becomes slaves to their false divinity which will make society to fall down. Women are generally inferior (yin) to the superior (yang) but this is not misogyny etc. as many people feel or react with emotions (typical yin response) rather then rethink and understand this topic (typical yang response). Inferior and superior must work together whatever it's spiritual matters of physical matters. In harmony or yin should be cut off for pure yang. As we do not have option yet to do that (technology will re-compensate yin in sci-fi way like yo have a children you do not need to have really any female parts but just sperm is enough which proves that yin and yang dynamics are real as many people still think that men need women to reproduce but it's actually otherwise etc.) So we need to rethink as human population those dynamics or technology will make women useless in mens life. Dawei you speak from absolute view (wuji) not relative (taji) view which makes not sense and it's not practical. When talking enlightenment we need to be enlightenment. When talking wuji you need to be in wuji if you are in taji and being affected by yin and yang you need to keep those dynamics as they are in relation to your experience rather then just going around and talking things which does not matter in our society. Wuji is only for cultivators who left taji behind or they are still in taji but beyond in every of their step.
-
Do these practices lead to Demonic Possession?
SeekerOfHealing replied to yondaime109's topic in General Discussion
Yes. working with spirits and opening to the spirits will harm you. Jesus even if not existent there is certain beings in christianity which could be consider much more yang then the lower spirits of yin which they will run away. To understand that (christian way) you need to understand doctrine of Palamas. I will quickly give you shortcut of what he said (which is very buddhist by the way). In orthodox christianity there is essence of God and energy of God. Calling name "Jesus" you calling actually energy of God (new age people would call it vibration etc.) which is more yang and this yang energy can transform you and things around. This is also actually basis of GOOD esoteric practice of buddhism. (Mantrayana/Mikkyo) so... yes depends if you are practicing yin or yang arts you will get results to the nature of practice. What you actually quoted are yin practices but those can have actually yang practices inside them too but most of them are just amateur and novices who do not know "sh.t" about those things and just randomly clicks the buttons on the pilot and then cry about it calling Jesus name they find results without understanding the mechanics of it and becomes followers. (I studied and practices christian/catholic/orthodox classics and read them too just in case someone would like to get into convo with me) -
He can take as much as he wants and as you are willing to pay. This is not the question. Question is what you actually paying for and how much you value. On free market such things are not a problem. I can sell air if you are willing to buy it. (which some people actually doing) If you want free teachings the dhamma is free but it will cost you. "I always laugh when people tell me that spiritual teachings should be free. They are the most important thing in the universe, so of course “they should be free” … but who will support the teacher to do that? No one wants to volunteer on that side of the equation, which shows how much people really value them. When I hear people say spiritual teachingsshould be free, I know the secret psychology hidden in their mind. Try asking them the following question and you’ll fathom it: “If they are so valuable to mankind and worth so much to others or you, what are YOU doing to support their existence other than to say they should be free? How much have you given to support and preserve them? What have you done?” When you get the answer, in most cases you’ll laugh because you’ll have figured out what’s going on."
-
Prerequisites for enlightenment (if any)
SeekerOfHealing replied to s1va's topic in General Discussion
yes. Buddha said to challenge everything but at the same his own teachings are called ehipassiko which means come nad see, experience by yourselves. Lets say I know I'm cook and you do not know I'm perfect cook. I made great pie which you would love but you have no idea about this besides your own making-up stories, ideas and ways of thinking about this and that. Your mouth will be shut up with the first taste of this pie which can be eye opening. (in buddha teachings it's called akaliko) So everybody who have results (akaliko) and knows this pie knows everything as this pie is everything. They know things to the extent of how much they eaten- 146 replies
-
- enlightenment
- qualification
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Philosophical vs. religious Taoism - Split Discussion
SeekerOfHealing replied to dust's topic in Newcomer Corner
True taoist do not produce feces. -
Prerequisites for enlightenment (if any)
SeekerOfHealing replied to s1va's topic in General Discussion
Not all paths are the same and definitely most of them will not bring the same results or even similar. People who are naive enough to believe such things ends up without any progression in spiritual path and cultivation.- 146 replies
-
- enlightenment
- qualification
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with: