Taomeow

It is a belief system for the indoctrinated, but for the indoctrinators it is primarily (and often entirely) a power grab system. All our "life sciences" inherited the tradition they directly arose from -- that of witch hunts, getting rid of ideological competition, gaining both power and money, monopolizing control of people's bodies, calling the shots. (There's a pun in there.)

The thread this one got split from was about LIFE sciences. And of course went as those topics always do: 1) When someone talks about the problems with LIFE sciences, the self-appointed defenders of science bring up TECHNOLOGY as proof of progress of SCIENCE. Technology, indeed, is booming and blooming, but this does not inform one of the state of affairs with life sciences. You want to know the state of affairs with their progress that made any positive difference in the lives of live humans? The last time life sciences made progress was in the 19th century when they stopped bashing the concept of hygiene and ridiculing and ostracizing surgeons who wanted to wash their hands before performing surgeries. And no longer put them in lunatic asylums for this crazy idea that infant and new mothers' mortality may have something to do with the fact that they dissect corpses for scientific purposes and then move on to delivering babies without washing their hands. 2) There's countless irresponsible endeavors in current LIFE sciences which the people currently called scientists do JUST BECAUSE THEY CAN, and most of them are extremely destructive to the health and well-being of actual live human beings and all creatures great and small. The bulk of tangible progress is in weaponized applications. Purportedly against the potential enemy. In reality, innocent bystanders who are affected are pretty much everybody on the planet. 3) This extinction-level status quo is entrenched so firmly and the indoctrination runs so deep, and is so all-encompassing, that talking not only with its perpetrators but also with its victims is usually an exercise in futility.

The hurricane/tropical storm is a couple hours away from us per latest predictions, but some fire hydrants in downtown decided to help it along ahead of schedule. Video: https://packaged-media.redd.it/k703vjwl1bjb1/pb/m2-res_1280p.mp4?m=DASHPlaylist.mpd&v=1&e=1692572400&s=6d053c7ae8deeab4e038fffffacb9f5afa090978#t=0

Or a penguin... same deal. Although penguins compensate by flying underwater. And an emu can outrun any number of competitive cyclists, to say nothing of ants.

Your experience does not contradict my statement. The thing is, there's no such generic thing as "scientists." I also have a master's (so what) and am a descendant of four generations of Ph.D.s, two of which achieved truly great things in (of all things) agricultural sciences whose positive impact lasts till today. (No, not pesticides or genetic modifications, nothing of the sort. Real agricultural science as it used to exist before all that jazz.) You may want to re-read what I wrote with this idea in mind: "scientists" and "science" is a profoundly ephemeral concept. Smoke and mirrors that may hide anyone and anything. That's the generic everyday use (or rather glaringly wrongful misuse) of the term "science," which (as @zerostao pointed out in the statement I was expounding on) is absolutely equal to a belief system. We are trained to believe statements we are told originate from "Science." "Trust the Science" absolutely equals "In God We Trust" -- it's a statement of belief plus a commandment. Real science has nothing to do with statements of belief and commandments. And real scientists... the system is set up to produce very few of those -- and disown, discredit, persecute them if they fail to toe the indoctrinators' line. But enough tangent.

This sounds like something from Zhuangzi. With this statement you have achieved greatness. Maybe not eternal -- but you did produced a great moment for me.

It was, which is why I didn't watch it. (The reason I pressed the "like" button is, I sometimes do that in acknowledgement of someone's contribution to keeping alive a thread which I don't want to fall by the wayside.) Why did you watch it?

Sorry to hear about your loss. My condolences.

In an alternative scenario, the nurse giving you the shot probably hit a blood vessel. Occasionally it happens, and that's what might cause bleeding (of varying intensity which depends on the size of the blood vessel hit). If you had no other symptoms while taking turmeric (e.g. abnormal bruising from things that shouldn't cause it, or spontaneous appearance of bruises out of nowhere, or any minor wounds that caused disproportionate bleeding, etc.) I don't think it's very likely that turmeric was involved. It is indeed a very mild blood thinner, key words very mild, and its mechanism of action is different from that of both aspirin and prescription blood thinners. It does not interfere with normal clotting in the real world, only in theory. There's cuisines (e.g. in many parts of India) where it is used in everyday dishes in amounts far exceeding what is usually taken as a supplement in the West. Of course if it's a before surgery situation it's prudent to take nothing at all, just to be on the safe side (except for Yunnan Baiyao of course -- and I wouldn't tell the allopaths about that one unless they were also knowledgeable in classical Chinese medicine, which would be too much to ask). Disclaimer: I ain't no doctor.

Roger Waters

I like learning new words on occasion, not ordinary words but stranger words. I wrote about anemoia on the previous page, and today I accidentally came across the lyrics of Bad Boys (it used to be the opening song of a TV show popular in the '90s) and learned idren. It's a Rastafarian term made out of "I" and "brethren" (or "sistren" -- it's gender neutral) that means "me and my spiritual brothers and sisters," "me and all my people." Interestingly, it sounds like one of those Chinese words where "ren" -- meaning "person" -- at the end forms a term of belonging to a group (e.g. Meiguoren -- American, Zhongguoren -- Chinese, and so on.. ) The daobumren are strange.

It comes from wuji (tao-in-stillness) transforming into taiji (tao-in-motion) also going by Xiantian and Houtian. Yang floats upward, yin sinks downward. That's the beginning of heaven and earth. "In the heaven images arise, on earth they take shape," as the Ta Chuan explains it. (Unlike in all hierarchical systems, it's not "heaven first, earth later," it's a mutually dependent and simultaneous process.) And then every step of the way the pattern gets refined/complicated -- up to 64 steps times five times eight and their ten thousand combinations... and that's the outer border of a meaningful pattern. Beyond it lies Hundun, where there's no pattern. Chaos. Plenty of information, no meaning.

I would say information is part of what qi is/does, but my understanding is that "pattern" runs deeper. When someone yells "fire!" in a theater -- that's information. But if there's no pattern consistent with that information (heat, flames, smoke, etc.) it may mean we have a prankster on our hands, or misinformation, or a mistake, or malicious intent, and so on. In other words, information is open to interpretation, while pattern is independent of interpretation. It just is what it is and does what it does. A practitioner of taoist arts and sciences observes the pattern and discerns its meaning -- and then interprets the resulting information. That's one reason we're not as hung up on names as some other practitioners are. My teacher, e.g., used to call the taiji move known as "White Crane Opens Wings" simply "Big Bird" -- but because the students were able to observe the pattern of that move, they didn't interpret it as an invitation to imitate the muppet character known as Big Bird. Likewise, I didn't know anything about the MCO when I had to buzz off my hair (normally long) because I had a distinct feeling that "that thing" running up my spine gets tangled in my hair and tickles most annoyingly. (I still have an old expired driver's license with a picture of me with that uncharacterisic hairstyle. Every time I see it, I'm, like, "what was I thinking?" -- and then I remember. And now I have the words for that... "oh... that's what it was, "'it'" was trying to go through the yuzhen 玉枕, and since that gate is perhaps the biggest obstacle in the orbit to overcome, '"it'" was sort of chipping away at the passage... and hair being in the way was, of course, a subjective interpretation of the sensations.)

double

Cats are also telepathic, capable of forming strong bonds with (the right) humans, dogs, each other, and sentimental objects -- a domestic cat's emotionality is not unlike ours, and they are strong empaths at that. And judging by some behaviors I've observed in some cats, they are no strangers to abstract thinking. I may have posted this before -- apologies if it's a repeat. This is the monument to Semyon the Traveling Cat installed in the city of Murmansk, Russia, and based on a true story. In 1987, the Sinishin family, returning from a vacation in Moscow, accidentally lost their cat named Semyon who was traveling with them and, as cats do, ran out to explore at some point and got lost in the huge city. Not knowing where to look, the family had to return home without him. Semyon showed up at the doorstep of their home in Murmansk six years later, skinny and tired but successful in his incredible quest. Murmansk is located two thousand kilometers away from Moscow (and a bit over a hundred kilometers away from the Arctic circle.) The story got published in the local newspaper and received a resonance comparable to the story of the Japanese dog Hachiko, who became a symbol of fidelity and also merited a monument. (The dog did the opposite of the traveling cat though -- he sat in one spot for years... but you probably saw the movie with Richard Gere.)

At the very least its curcurmin is a strong pigment, and many pigments of plant origin tend to reduce inflammation due to their antioxidant properties and ability to interact with inflammatory pathways. Anthocyanins in berries and grapes, carotenoids like lycopene in tomatoes and beta-carotene in carrots, etc.. I don't think it's a magic bullet but apparently it can contribute to the good causes. I usually have a Vietnamese turmeric ointment on hand for mishaps like cuts and scrapes and use it instead of neosporin et al (which prevent infections but also impede and slow down the healing of wounds.) Internally it's supposed to be combined with piperine which potentiates its effectiveness.

Cobra and chicken. A bazi reader at work smiles: Six Harmonies.

@steve Here's a hug. If you think sharing might help, drop a line.

Easy peasy. I even know the mantra for this: Black hole sun, won't you come, won't you come...

None of them are reliable. I trust your British version but I don't hear it in the US. Neither does Grok, apparently. This summer I was flying somewhere with a stopover in London, where random strangers called me "love" on three separate occasions when all I did was ask a question about getting from point A to point B or procuring a cup of espresso. Here I have never heard "love" used as a vocative toward a stranger. We might say "dear" or "honey" or some such.

According to Grok, it's a white cat thing. Q: Briefly: difference in meaning between American and British English for the word "modernism" A: In American and British English, "modernism" generally refers to a cultural, artistic, and literary movement from the late 19th to mid-20th century, emphasizing innovation, experimentation, and a break from traditional forms. The meaning is largely the same in both contexts, with no significant regional difference. Both associate it with movements in art, literature, and architecture (e.g., Joyce, Woolf, or Bauhaus). Any subtle distinctions might arise in academic or contextual usage, but these are minor and not systematically regional.

As for me, I'm not a hostage to modernism (did you mean modernity? 'cause modernism I don't have any use for, except maybe Cézanne but he was not quite that yet, just the transitional phase from art to all that nonsense). Rather, I'm trying to be an interpreter/translator when I resort to modern analogies. The reason for this is, I try to talk to real hostages-to-modernity in the parlance I hope/believe they know well. I know other languages too but those are not exactly widespread here, so I mostly keep them to myself, except for an occasional song of my people -- meow... meow... meowwwwwwwww....

When I asserted -- as I have for the past 25+ years -- that qi is the medium and message of meaningful change, I didn't say it lightly. A somewhat (but not quite) similar dual understanding which some phenomena merit causes physicists to refer to elementary particles as both particles and waves. It's not something an everyday mind steeped in "either/or" dualities of observable macro phenomena wraps itself around with ease. Could it be that your shiatsu teacher may have focused on the "message" part of what qi "is and does" but either overlooked or decided to ignore the "medium" part. Qi is both, and it is neither by itself. It's a medium/message of change, simultaneously. A bit like coffee from that old maxim: when you boil an egg in water it gets hard, when you boil a carrot in water it gets soft, but when you boil ground coffee in water it changes the water. Qi changes the medium it operates in while changing itself. Qi does travel though meridians not unlike that -- except it doesn't have to be a substance in order to both undergo and engender change... it's the pattern that travels -- and substances encountered on the way align (or resist aligning) with the pattern. Patterns underlie both matter and energy. Also sprach The Ta Chuan aka The Great Treatise on the Changes.

Does wifi exist? Is it a substance? Is your phone born with its Uber app? With its Instagram app? How about Amazon? Is your credit card stuffed with paper dollars and coins, which are substances? How do you fit them in there? Do your hundred dollar bills physically lose weight when there's inflation in the country? Does your bank account gain weight when you make a deposit? Does it lose weight when you make a payment? How about energy? What energy exactly does it gain or lose? And so on. The world does not just consist of substances and energies. The world is also choke full of changes. Changes can be meaningful or meaningless. Qi is the medium and message of meaningful change. The signifier of meaningful change is a pattern. MCO is not a substance and not "energy." (Oh the pop use of the term by folks who don't understand Newtonian mechanics, let alone quantum mechanics!) MCO is a pattern of movement of qi. A bit like an app. Sometimes it installs itself after you push the right button. Sometimes people push wrong buttons and it doesn't. But once it's there you know it's there. Just like Uber. You can get a ride if you have pushed the right button to install the Uber app. Does Uber exist? Do you carry a little inflatable car in your phone for it to exist? A hundred thousand little cars? ??? And yet you can get a ride if you have the app. Also sprach Taomeow.