voidisyinyang
The Dao Bums-
Content count
9,748 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Everything posted by voidisyinyang
-
http://www.brownpundits.com/2017/06/29/aryan-migration-and-its-discontents/ http://gnxp.nofe.me/
-
http://www.brownpundits.com/2017/06/23/on-the-aryan-debate-the-linguistics-pov/ So much for the Graeco-Aryan Hypothesis. haha. Proto-Aryan? Non-existent. and
-
https://gnxp.nofe.me/2017/04/20/aryan-marauders-from-the-steppe-came-to-india-yes-they-did/
-
Nungali - you need to read the links I posted. The latest DNA analysis has caused a big upset in India. The caste system clearly shows white skin preference for the Brahmin caste. Aurobindo was Dravidian and the DNA evidence shows that West Asians have no South Indian affiliation. This means it is possible that South Indians indeed are mainly African - paleolithic - as many look African. But more likely it is that South Indians migrated from West Asia at a much older time period. So there is new "ancient" DNA analysis that will resolve that question. But in regards to the Aryan "invasion" of India - it mainly occurred around 1200 BCE and at that time a strict caste system with no inter marriage between castes was introduced. Also you apparently like the "Indo-European" or Indo-Aryan" or whatever "culture" - but just as "Arya" means Noble - it is in contrast to slaves. So this indicates a very hierarchical system using slavery - and nothing to be emulated.
-
https://gnxp.nofe.me/2017/06/24/indian/ emphasis in original. http://www.brownpundits.com/2017/06/20/indian-genetics-the-never-ending-argument/ e. Actually the historical and ancient DNA evidence both point to the fact that East Asian ancestry arrived in the last two thousand years. The spread of the first Gokturk Empire, and then the documented shift in the centuries around 1000 A.D. from Iranian to Turkic in what was Turan, signals the shift toward an East Asian genetic influx. Alexander the Great and other Greeks ventured into Central Asia. The people were described as Iranian looking (when Europeans encountered Turkic people like Khazars they did note their distinctive physical appearance). We have ancient DNA from the Altai, and those individuals initially seemed overwhelmingly West Eurasian. Now that we have Scythian ancient DNA we see that they mixed with East Asians only on the far east of their range. I'm quoting Rhazid Khan: So Proto-Aryan takes a nose-dive. Or "proto-Indo-Iranian" https://gnxp.nofe.me/2017/04/20/aryan-marauders-from-the-steppe-came-to-india-yes-they-did/ So glad to see an Indian scientist spreading the truth!!
-
Still Western tuning. I heard him live in high school I think. I was into minimalism in high school - and so followed a local band named Zeitgeist. But it's still Western tuning. Did he change the piano tuning? I performed JOhn Cage in my piano concert - prepared piano - so that was a gateway....
-
I've heard Tool before - sorry. Not much of it since it is Western tuning - so no need to hear much. Western logarithmic tuning is inherently limited. Sure you can do a lot with the limitations. So when I played piano - I studied an overview of all genres of music. Then I also played all other genres of music in other bands. Then I realized that Pythagorean tuning was the real truth. That was high school. So then - I played free jazz for a few years - as free improv with a street musician. But I was listening to nonwestern music mainly live. Then.... I researched the topic for my master's thesis. It's called "sound-current nondualism and music theory and radical ecology." That was still not the real truth.
-
Well - it is kind of not that simple - I was not just playing classical music.
-
Yep wacky - as in I did 20 plus years of research on it. haha. I studied music privately with a former university music professor and then I was in the music composition department at University and studied music in college, etc. So Tool doesn't impress me. Sorry. haha.
-
You mean I won't listen to Tool? Sorry. I studied music in depth - so actually I performed a classical piano concert at the end of high school and studied music in college, etc.
-
This also is a "projection" - it's like Christian evangelicists insisting you "submit" to a "conversion." haha. Hilarious. Again as I've stated - music is the common cultural core of modern biological humans.
-
Obviously you're projecting. Just because I refer to "original sin" does not mean I "agree" with it.
-
Is that reference to you not reading my posts? Self-censorship?
-
yeah "progressive rock" is very Aryan. haha. Sorry - but music rhythms is not quite what I'm talking about although "syncopation" is related to "original Sin" (the Moon god of Sumeria). So there is a connection but as long as Tool uses Western logarithmic music tuning - which they do - then I have no interest in listening. haha.
-
http://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2016/04/y-hg-j2-cannot-be-genetic-marker-of.html
-
No actually the original human culture, the San Bushmen, did the same spiritual training as Taoism - so it's the same culture - it is preserved through music, not through language as much. So all human cultures use the 1-4-5 music intervals - and that is the secret of the Taoist alchemy training as well. It's not U2 or some fake Western liberal imperialism.
-
When I said "not done" I meant - "not done making fun" of the term proto-Aryan. As you might have noticed - your embrace of PII leads to the Graeco-Aryan hypothesis. So that means that the Minoans would have been, according to Renfrew, from the Aryans. But the Aryan language is Indo-European which is from the Steppes - as in Proto-Indo-European. So then Proto-Aryan is only after the "migration" of the Steppe chariot culture into what becomes your sacred homeland for Aria or Arya or whatever. But the DNA science I already cited - shows that the Minoans are from BEFORE any Steppe Indo-European Yamnaya culture. So in other words the Minoans are from a West Asian Anatolian farming culture - and then later there was Indo-European "migration" to Crete. And this "migration" into Crete was a different Indo-European language - I think I gave the link. So you have some blending of Hurrian with local Afro-Semitic languages - but it's not the same as the Steppe Yamnaya languages for North and West Europe. So I'll dig into that more.
-
So you're saying this article will call the Australian's Caucasian? Are these Africans called Causcasians? https://mathildasanthropologyblog.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/lighter-eyes-means-lighter-skin/
-
It was a joke and yes it was made up by that science blogger for Discover Magazine. I'm not done yet with "proto-Aryan" as "proto-Iranian" is the new version of it. But as for Chinese Indo-European words - they could be African - i.e. paleolithic.
-
umm.... we are all Africans - just 7000 generations ago we are all direct cousins. All modern humans are Africans since Bushmen San are the most genetically diverse modern humans. But to answer your question specifically - one of the links I posted goes into that in more detail.
-
WRONG. So you most have ignored my previous posts. Hilarious. How about some remedial reading? http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/01/stop-using-the-word-caucasian-to-mean-white/#.WVvbVVGQwqQ Aryanoid is from this science blog post.
-
Kongming makes a good point but it is not true. haha. So I pointed out that the pre-Nazis claimed that "Aryan" referred to "culture and language" and not race. Those are code words for racism - plain and simple. There never were any European Aryans as the OP has claimed, nor an "Old Aryan Empire" So Kongming makes racist statements based on the blatant error of "Aryan Europe" claimed by the OP - Aryan Europe is also a racist term. http://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2016/04/y-hg-j2-cannot-be-genetic-marker-of.html
-
I'm willing to admit the term "proto-Aryan" instead of "old Aryan empire" and "Aryan Europe" If people want to say "proto-aryan" that is o.k. since it's almost as good as Aryanoid. O.K. Proto-Aryan is a bit dated but at least it's not just made up like "Aryanoid." Wow so there is a youtube vid on "proto-Aryans" but then it says a Tocharian is Aryan. Nope. Wrong. tocharians are "proto-Aryans." haha. Funny how this obsession with Aryan European Empire does not just admit that white skin is from malnutrition! haha. Hilarious. Nungali - is this what you mean by your "Old Aryan Empire"? haha. Hilarious! Hold on - how come Europeans are "Aryans" yet white broad-headed Mongoloids are "proto-Aryans"? Not fair. Europeans are ALSO Proto-Aryans! Proto-Aryans Unite! https://hermetic.com/yarker/the-arcane-schools/proto-aryan-civilisation-and-mysteries guess we can't expect more from a Freemason.... http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2010/12/solution-to-problem-of-indo-aryan.html Well that is almost Proto-Aryan. So that blogpost is 7 years old but the last comment is a year old - a pdf link. Let's see what it is. I'll read it later.
-
Crocodile is original origin of Chinese Dragon: Ancient Taoist Origins
voidisyinyang replied to voidisyinyang's topic in General Discussion
O.K. thanks that's interesting. Is this some kind of embryo form? Maybe I didn't mention it before - but the Dragon and Tiger are not just "paired" but paired as East and West - which is the very specific Taoist alchemy meaning. If you study the book Taoist Yoga: Alchemy and Immortality it gives more details - or my free pdf. http://www.china.org.cn/english/China/217743.htm http://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-asia/relics-niuheliang-goddess-temple-most-mysterious-site-ancient-hongshan-002594 So that jade dragon is supposed to have a pig's head? hmm - is that before the crocodile dragon? I got a pdf on Chinese ancient rituals... So it mentions the 6000 year old dragon and tiger. No mention of the pig-dragon. O.K. says the temple where that pig-dragon is found is over 5000 years old. So not as old as the crocodile Dragon. Sorry. Oh wait - sure enough a section on the "pig-dragon" says dates back to 5,000 years ago. So that's from the Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. -
O.K. so first you removed a word to misquote me. Now you quote half of a sentence and say you would have never said that. What was the half of a sentence? Taoism is from IndoEuropeans. So you removed the word "from" to create the lie that I stated "Taoism is IndoEuropeans." Now you want to create the lie that I stated "Taoism is from IndoEuropeans." Let's look at the full sentence to see what I actually stated. So that's just half of the sentence. It says the opposite of what you keep claiming I stated. haha. Now you keep stating ad hominems against me. Really it is getting boring - except that you now posted this image that you referred to in your OP. Wow it is like pulling Dragon's Teeth! Thanks for that image. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persian_miniature#Chinese_influences http://chinese-unicorn.com/ch14/