Sulo Eno

Are there any non-Taoists, non-Buddhists here? I am interested in FP for overall health, and wonder if there is anyone else here like me.

Hello, As I mentioned in a recent post, I am just beginning the FP series. Haven't noticed any blue light or aura, and am not particularly interested in doing so. Is this something people necessarily experience? Does it go away if one quits practicing? Seems metaphysical and slightly unsettling.

Hello, I have recently become interested in Flying Phoenix Chi Kung. I have studied various forms of Chinese martial arts for most of my adult life (mostly external) along with some Chen Tai Chi. I am interested in the health benefits of Flying Phoenix, but have no interest in Taoism or Buddhism. I have studied them and have no misgivings about remaining Catholic. Incidentally, I have no need for syncretism, nor for obscure forms of christianity. In short, are there other people who self-identify as "Christian" who practice Flying Phoenix Chi Kung? I ask because there seem to be a great many people who practice eastern religions here and wonder if I am quite alone. P.S. This is not intended to stir a debate relevant to the truth content of various religions. Thanks, Sulo

Hi "I'd say you probably want to do some deep introspection about why these phenomena make you uncomfortable before proceeding with FP practice." I don't require deep introspection to know why these phenomena make me uncomfortable. a.) These are abnormal in the general human population. b.) I don't know the source or mechanics of these phenomena. c.) I don't know the consequences of these phenomena.

Hello, I am just beginning the first DVD of the Flying Phoenix series. I am wondering how close to the inhalation-exhalation percentages one has to be for it to be effective (or how far off one has to be to have negative effects). I am likely over-analyzing, but it seems I can't be certain as to what 40% is. Also, assuming one practices the first series (1st DVD), how long before one practices the second? Third? Does one practice Everything in one day (1st DVD, 2nd DVD, etc.)? Thanks much.

Has anyone heard of this series? Specifically this http://www.martialartsmart.com/dvd-yz110.html. I found this in an old box. I have heard people say generally good things about him.

I think there are too many terms here that are either esoteric or vague for me to comment. I just don't agree about this "source". I believe that there are objective truths. I don't believe in syncretism.

No. I have not sought such an article. The burden of proof is on the more outrageous claim. I do admit to being a bit snobbish when it comes to academic and pseudo-academic articles. The linked article has--in my view--irrelevant footnotes, that is, few to underscore the big claims. It's the sort of stuff you find on the History Channel.

Hi, I'm not sure why you are directing these quotes at me.

Thanks. I appreciate the thought and the welcome. I enjoy keeping things amicable between everyone. Truly wanting the best for everyone. Then again, that's why people discuss issues they think are important. I can understand that you might not regard Taoism as a religion. However, it depends on how you define "religion". I think most people believe religion concerns systems that answer existential questions, have a supernatural element, have rituals, etc. In some sense I could see how most far-eastern religions are more philosophical than "religious", especially Confucianism. Yet, in most books, Buddhism and Taoism make the cut. Regards

Now you're talking.

Old hat; I've heard many times before. I could send you to a hundred websites. http://shamelesspopery.com/jesus-and-mithras-debunked/ Unconvincing. Thanks.

I don't view the world the same way. I suppose I am more "Western" in my application of reason.

It is a matter of self-identification. Any time you make an "I am..." statement, a description (quite probably, a label, follows). We do this with the outside world: "these are flowers", "those are tires". You seem to have an ambivalent relationship with self-identification and describing the world-at-large. (Maybe I don't understand your position). Thanks.

Thanks much. Out of curiosity, is the Tao Tan Pai something that can produce this Kundalini syndrome (or something like it)? I have always wondered why people engage in Kundalini practice, when it is not infrequent that harmful effects are a consequence (and not uncomplicated to undo).

Thanks. I would very much enjoy an explanation from Sifu Terry at some point. Best regards.

Hi, Thanks much for the response. One item was unclear: "...so there is no issue unless you believe there is something to worry about." If there is nothing to worry about (per my original question, such as the Kundalini syndrome-like effects), then there wouldn't be anything to worry about.

Omnipresent and omnipotent means God is all-present and all-powerful. It does not mean he there is any necessity for Him to intervene and sustain life. If you add omniscient (all-knowing) as a characteristic it still doesn't necessitate His intervening in our lives and essentially keeping us and our world in existence (and alive). Only an act of benevolence continues to sustain life. I don't believe that there are "flavors of religion", nor do I believe all religions are essentially the same. I don't believe Jesus was simply and enlightened being. I do believe our immortal souls are, in fact, impressed by words and rituals. I thank you for your thoughts. It is nice to be able to civilly discuss these matters. However, I think our opinions differ greatly. Best regards.

I don't know what you're actually trying to say here with reference to God, religion, etc. Catholic theology makes a clear point of saying the Trinity is indivisible (if you are referring to this).

No problem. If I am wrong, I would like to know. Many people here know things I don't and I can accept that (even though it is human to want to know everything). I think it is a vain man indeed who feels offense at being corrected, especially if the correction is made out of good will. Regards.

That isn't how it works, at least in Catholicism. We aren't omnipotent beings by extension (the Kingdom of God being "within" and God being omnipotent). We don't understand the Biblical texts as you suggest. Best regards.

Ha ha... Isn't this something you would know about yourself? Is it how you would label yourself anyway?

Thanks. To my way of thinking a Taoist is one who practices Taoism. One need not be a master. I agree about being open, but in my experience, too many people are uncritical. We still have to form judgements relative to ideas. Is an idea plausible? On what basis is something said? By what authority? Regards.

If you mean this "You are in good company with like-minded compassionate folks who aided my own development to the limits of my choice in mindfulness and appreciation of the universal wisdom shared freely here." I'm not sure. "You are in good company with like-minded compassionate folks..." Thank you "...who aided my own development to the limits of my choice in mindfulness and appreciation of the universal wisdom shared freely here." I don't think I understand completely what is meant here. It sounds kind and thoughtful though. Be assured of no deliberate ill will on my part.

Hello, I joined this site specifically to practice Flying Phoenix Chi Kung. However, I am wondering if I am able to do this properly for the health (non-spiritual) benefits only. I don't need any supernatural sensations. I certainly don't want any negative Kundalini syndrome-like effects. I am not a Taoist. Is my task quite impossible? I have e-mailed the author of the DVDs, Sifu Dunn, but I'm sure he's quite busy. Does anyone have any input? Better yet, anyone in my situation? I am a practicing Catholic (I have read that a Master Duan was as well). Regards.