Daniel

The Dao Bums
  • Content count

    2,796
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

Everything posted by Daniel

  1. On distinguishing delusion, insight, insanity and reality

    @stirling, Yesterday at 04:51 PM - I posted "Propaganda 101: The Target is a Good-Hearted-Person". It has nothing to do with you. yesterday at 05:14 PM - You asked me, " what this post is in reference to, and to which propaganda you are referring" yesterday at 05:17 PM - I answered: "Facts vs. Whispers in general" ( You didn't read or understand this, it's GENERAL ) yesterday at 05:20 PM - You asked: "Which post(s) in particular blah, blah, blah, ... " ( you ignored, that I said, GENERAL ) I laugh, because I can tell you're imagining yourself as the center of my attention yesterday at 05:25 PM - I tell you: "not yours" ( I think it's funny that you reacted so strongly to this, I take note. ) I send you a Private message: "I ask you, Do you honestly want to talk about my post. If so, we can chat about it." You read it, I wait, I wait, I wait. 12 minutes pass. You don;t reply. You don;t honestly want to talk about the post, or understand the context. You don't want to talk about it. You want to argue with me in public. i take note. You're not being honest. It's not about making sure I'm not attacking anyone. If so, you would have had a conversation in private like any other staff member. yesterday at 07:07 PM - You reply and ask why I can't answer? But I did. YOU IGNORED IT, because it didn't give you what you wanted to read. You were assuming IT MUST BE AN INSULT. I have no clue what you are talking about in this thread. Were you whispering? Were you fluffing up facts to exaggerate them, or something? I have no clue. yesterday at 07:43 PM - I showed you the answer, again. You still didn't read it. yesterday at 07:46 PM - I tell you, I'm not spending any of my energy to find new ways to write something that you're going to ignore. yesterday at 08:14 PM - I show you: You're asking for Particular, I answered you, It's general. By my count, it took you 4 tries to read the word GENERAL and stop the witch hunt.
  2. For the Enlightened: A question

    OK. I'll go check. Since you deny it.
  3. For the Enlightened: A question

    In your dreams, bro. I don't ask you anything other than to illustrate an error in your cognition, faulty thinking, and illogic when you PUSH it at me. If you were not on staff, I would ignore you.
  4. For the Enlightened: A question

    I told you: "not yours". I do not read anything you write. I scroll past them. I told you my posts had nothing to do with you. You had kittens. You kept going, and going, and going. There was nothing insulting. You were over-reacting.
  5. For the Enlightened: A question

    Of course I can. But your behavior discourages me. The question is: "What is ... ?" The question is not: "How do I ... ?"
  6. For the Enlightened: A question

    OK. Good. You can't explain it. You don't have the words. Thank you. You had an experience. You decided that the experience is what ALL koans point to. Clearly. Got it. You found a quote somewhere that resonates with you. OK. No one taught you. No discourse. No text. No teacher. No words to explain it. Right. You don't have words for it. You had an experience. Now you talk about it. But you can't explain it. But you can't teach it. Whatever you learned, you can't explain it. Stirling, can you give me one good reason to take any of this seriously?
  7. For the Enlightened: A question

    And start quacking like ducks...
  8. For the Enlightened: A question

    Stirling, We aren't supposed to be interacting. It's in the best interests of the community. I thought you knew that. Yesterday, you broke the silence to poke me in the chest about some mysterious 'particular post' that had you doing backflips. How about this? Leave me alone. I have zero interest in what you have to offer. Zen is a tiny little curio among all the others in my knowledgebase. You do realize that your experiential understanding can be taught in about 5 minutes or less to anyone under the right conditions? Your lineage does not OWN these practices. They don't belong to you.
  9. For the Enlightened: A question

    I feel you're being obstinate.
  10. For the Enlightened: A question

    You said : Nothing to do, no where to go. That's solitary confinement. Not a gateless-gate, or anything relating to the topic It's nothing. Literally.
  11. For the Enlightened: A question

    That doesn't answer the question. You "learned" it? Why the quotes? Did you learn it or not? So you can't explain it, right? You don't have words for it? No one taught you the right words?
  12. For the Enlightened: A question

    Good for you Which is it? Did you learn it, or did you experience something that you cannot explain?
  13. For the Enlightened: A question

    I missed it then. Oh well.
  14. For the Enlightened: A question

    That's your answer? It's meaningless.
  15. For the Enlightened: A question

    How do you describe "choosing indifference"? When is it useful? When is it dangerous? I'll give you a hint: it's taught in SERE.
  16. For the Enlightened: A question

    Not true: choosing indifference is a bad paradox. It's in contrast to agnosticism ( the good natural version ) ( Few consider the distinction , especially if they deny all distinction. It's an ugly, bad-bad paradox. )
  17. For the Enlightened: A question

    What's stopping you?
  18. For the Enlightened: A question

    Let me help you, A gateless-gate: do it, or not. It's open. There's no gate. The door is off the hinges.
  19. For the Enlightened: A question

    Nope. That a cage, dude
  20. For the Enlightened: A question

    The first koan I learned. Also the password on my wifi-hotspot.
  21. For the Enlightened: A question

    Ah. Thank you. I have edited the post. LINK
  22. For the Enlightened: A question

    You have my sympathy
  23. For the Enlightened: A question

    I want to, but, I don't know how without influencing the answers in a negative way.