Indiken

My opinion, Best is based on knowledge, if you have not required knowledge what is best, then best is personal preference. Another personal preference may be to solve imperfections. Also, for me being physically unhealthy, having impropriate social status is hindrance to behaving like my morality ideas require.

Lack of knowledge to decide which is better.

Sorry, I think that was sarcasm to freeform statement.

It will continue until you start to think and decide which of the side of conflict to choose.

Christianity is not spiritual.

.

Yes, my friend, it takes quite a being to withstand knowledge, that is why you are stuck at this low level of yours. I think if common person suddenly would be given much deeper knowledge, they might go in panic, get crazy or kill themselves to alleviate stress. I remember reading comment in Youtube where a person described his experience after psychedelic trip, after that he said he was watching children movies with zero negativity all month to recover.

Then I do not understand the meaning of your previous post. My understanding is this: if a person gets a thing which he need, that thing is beneficial to him; if a person gets a thing which he do not need, that is detrimental. But you seem to separate concepts of need and benefit, could you correct me and expand on this ? What are the elements you refer to ? Could you explain them ? I am familiar with metal, water, wood, earth and fire. To me, these "elements" are helper terms for TCM to remember or understand human body organs behaviour. Also, these elements terminology could be used to categorize matter pre-technological way. You seem to say that humans are single organism with earth(roots), and then you say that we are child of earth(mother), am I correct ? Could you expand on what is fundamental and not fundamental nature and why you call them this way. Is our fundamental nature to be apes hanging in trees ?

I am sorry, I think this would be detrimental to my health.

It seems I understand you. You desire less materialism. To clarify, I did not meant specifically farm animals, I meant all animals, stating farm as an example. It is like, I would feel more relaxed around furniture, electronics, cloth, but not around biology: plants, flowers, animals. I agree.

.

Respectfully, I think you are not correct in a sense that this is for everyone, if I understand your statement correct. Looking at the trees, sea, lake is somewhat distressing for me, but looking at plain and mountains healing. Also, being surrounded and dealing with material things is also relaxing for me. For example it is disgusting for me to think about living around many animals like in a farm.

.

.

No.

New ideas.

I think they have. I see many educated dull uncomprehending people. There was shiny armor in the Middle Ages, but was it warm as much as in the Republican Rome period? Ok. Please, say what do you think is "idiocity"? What are the reasons for you to say that new Age is idiocity?

Are you saying that new Age is idiocity itself, or that some of it is idiocity ?

I have some thoughts regarding how people influence the weather, For example, it seems that there was different weather/climate in Republic/Early Imperial Rome and Late Imperial Rome. This idea stems from comparison of Roman infantry armor and clothing. Might it be that Christianity changed people and people changed the weather/climate?

.

.

@Lairg Maybe you have knowledge on these topics: 1. What could be the purpose for UFO/flying saucer deliberately showing itself to a person ? Or maybe, seeing UFO does not have any or only a small significance for the person witnessing the UFO ? 2. What could be the purpose of sphere of light appearing in the person's room while he is sleeping and stopping the dream and producing clanking sound in the head with the images of computer program running(hex numbers in command line). The person affected feels pleasure at the center of the middle chest and center of forehead ? Thanks.

I remember in my childhood when a person selling video games accused me of lying. I was lying. That is the only memory of me accused of lying that I can remember at this moment. It is painful to remember and it was painful to experience this accusation. But the person was right. If I used the concept of "you are wrong", maybe that would be better if I used the concept of "you are lying". I know two different statements which logically contradict one another, so I ask for clarification, why it is so. I do not understand where is the "rejection" here.

Why ? EDIT: I mean, how should I say ? You are misunderstanding, You are delusional, You are saying not truth. How to say in sweet terms, that person is wrong ? If two persons opinions differ, what does that mean - That there are multiple truths ? That one person knows the truth and other does not ?

@小梦想 , you say that: When a person by name Giovanni Macioca in a book called "The Foundations of Chinese Medicine"(2015) in page 47, clearly defines "Essence" or "Jing" as a "Vital Substance". So, I see 4 possibilities here: You are lying Giovanni Macioca is lying I misunderstand You and Giovanni Macioca are speaking about different things using the same words Could you clarify ?