My comment was directed at perception / observation and interpretation thereof in general concerning the thread topic. It might have been better to have asked, if âmagicalâ isnât always an âsubjective interpretationâ?
When one feels âin syncâ with natural surroundings an inside feeling might coincide with outside happenings. Some would ascribe this to religion or alike, if a God Beeing is missing in their worldview. E.g. when it starts to snow when it hasnât in a while and that falls into place with a feeling you havenât had for a long time. Or recognizing a double rainbow at an ancient place above you after an emotional experience.
Iâm very sorry you took my comment personal, that wasnât intended. I just reflected upon own observations, and you and Cobie might scould me (again) for being so unobservant to otherâs possible experience and perceptions. Apologies!
And thanks for clarifying: I wasnât aware the sincere traditional Buddhists are as âplayfulâ as to consider such a subjective interpretation of events as their path. I always thought they were foremost going for âobjectivityâ or oneness without suffering. Not personal peace with another person through connection.
But that was indeed an element I hadnât thought about. If that is indeed a solid traditional interpretation of what this branch of Buddhism is about, I am glad to know that now.
So Vajrayana is a special way of subjective âconnectingâ and interpreting? I might pm you about this question as it strays from the topic, even if it were a ancient tradition thereof.
