Lairg

Personally I see the Cosmos as coherent and intelligent. It seems to encourage my experiments And I have had a few data points that indicate that there is more of me than I see in the mirror

That seems adverse. Mostly I like to keep the energy in my body

How would you test that identification?

Ethical conduct is certainly necessary - but whose ethics? Ethos is a Greek word meaning "character," originally denoting "custom" or "habit." It forms the root of the term "ethikos," which means "morality" or "showing moral character." Perhaps human ethics are not quite there yet

'Are there recognized phases one moves through on the path to the LIGHT?' Mostly the human learns to control the physicality of the body and then the desires of the body As that progresses, the human becomes more aware of its emotions and hopefully learns to control that too. As that progresses the human becomes more aware of its thoughts and hopefully learns to control those too. So, with proper (clean) control, alignment and intent of/in the physical, emotional and mental bodies, the human then has a persona (mask) can be useful in the local cosmos. With some other preconditions, the human becomes eligible for first stage enlightenment - and admission into the outer layer of the collective of enlightened beings Second stage enlightenment requires control, alignment and intent within the heart Etc...

There’s a natural background rate to the timing and frequency of extinctions: 10% of species are lost every million years, 30% every 10 million years, and 65% every 100 million years. https://ourworldindata.org/mass-extinctions

There are some apparently alien accounts that the concepts of good and evil, and religion itself, are specific (unique?) to the Earth humanity Perhaps it is all about learning. Some learn in more difficult ways Maybe the "sinners" provide more intense and therefore faster learning for themselves and others. That would be useful if the Earth were a training ground I suspect a top-down view of this solar system gives a quite different perspective

That is not my observation of the karmic and dark influences present

The germ theory of disease has often failed experimental testing. Some prefer the terrain theory of disease. Still others look more deeply - into trauma and relationships Others consider karmic influences to be greater still

Alternatively, the humanity living on the surface of this planet has yet to reach design functionality

Does the human race have a role in balancing light and dark in this galaxy?

It seems that humanity is a very recent organ within the EM. Who could have imagined that growth could occur in the Cosmos?

Unless the Earth Mother is alive In which case our human forms are cells within the body of the EM

The experiment is not hard

It is the end of an era so it is natural that many social and power structures fall away - including those of surface Earth humanity. Stand outside this solar system and have another look. There is a galactic process that is doing well. And it turns out that this planet is more useful than it appears from the human bottom up view

The initial ideas that appeared in my consciousness seemed entirely natural. In those days I had no sense of any adverse approaches. Later I perceived words and voices in my head. It took me 10 years to identify the primary voice in my head. It turned out that I knew him from several lives - going back a long long way. Heart light: there is a vertical stream of spiritual light that anchors in the heart of the standard format for humans. The light provides life force and spiritual purpose. The anchor in the heart can be seen as a flame as depicted in the post-reformation religious art of the Roman church Some humans have dark layers that interfere with the flow. Pushing light from the heart around the physical body will eventually disperse all interferences https://www.thedaobums.com/search/?&q="heart light"&sortby=newest

I started with Transcendental Meditation and after perhaps 4 years started to get interventions during my meditation. One week I was taught a new technique each morning. The first was most important: learning to control my consciousness to specific planes and subplanes. That is the basis for reproducible spiritual science. So my development was directly assisted once my TM practice had progressed. These days I work more with heart light

It might be better to classify "souls" by something a bit more technical than human observation of behavior. Even better, it might be useful to be clearer about what is meant by "soul". For example the Egyptian and Jewish traditions consider that the human has 5 souls

As I recall the mystics used another term: godhead It seems that the concept of God did not fit with their experiences Personally I prefer terms such as The Source of All. I do not like religious filters on my inner experiences

Read the work of Wilhelm Reich

Enki is occasionally interviewed on exopolitics.org He was asked how he managed immortality. He replied that when his body is worn out, he makes a clone and inhabits that

Unless the universe is the living body of a great entity

I am careful about where I live and go, and what I take into my physical, emotional and mental bodies. I keep EMR exposure to a minimum. There are no apparent chem trails and I have yet to detect graphene in the air

Fomenko's statistical analysis was based on written documents. As I recall the earliest copy of the NT is a document from the 14th century. Similarly with Jewish writings. How then to put an age to the content? There is some hope in that Sumerian tablets, once translated in the mid 19th century, showed alarming similarity to some religious practices and texts. For example much more detail is given for the processes described in the Book of Genesis. I know little of the accuracy of dating clay tablets.

When I breathe in, I take in life force from the Cosmos. Sometimes I direct that life force to deficient areas of the physical body