Sir Darius the Clairvoyent

Could i have one please?

Thank you for the video. how do you feel about academica at lagre disputing the exodus, as there has been found zero evidence of it?

Very interresting, do you have a sense of who those cultures might have been?

Could you imagine… giving palestine (the holy land) to india… i think we might have solved peace in the mid east. but unironically… all of us has probally done more for world peace then many of the ones who have won it, just by not starting a war. Allthough replacing the palestinians with hindus would cause a third world war

gen: 26Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, a and over all the creatures that move along the ground.” (…) But for Adam f no suitable helper was found. 21So the Lord God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man’s ribs g and then closed up the place with flesh. 22Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib hhe had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man. (…) The man said, “The woman whom you gave to be with me, she gave me fruit of the tree, and I ate.” Then the LORD God asked the woman, "What have you done?" "The snake deceived me, and I ate," the woman answered. So the LORD God said to the serpent, “Because you have done this, “Cursed are you above all livestock and all wild animals! You will crawl on your belly and you will eat dust all the days of your life. Deut: Clean and Unclean Food 14 You are the children of the Lord your God. Do not cut yourselves or shave the front of your heads for the dead, 2 for you are a people holyto the Lord your God. Out of all the peoples on the face of the earth, the Lord has chosen you to be his treasured possession. 3 Do not eat any detestable thing. 4 These are the animals you may eat: the ox, the sheep, the goat, 5 the deer, the gazelle, the roe deer, the wild goat, the ibex, the antelope and the mountain sheep.[d] 6 You may eat any animal that has a divided hoof and that chews the cud.7 However, of those that chew the cud or that have a divided hoof you may not eat the camel, the rabbit or the hyrax. Although they chew the cud, they do not have a divided hoof; they are ceremonially unclean for you. 8 The pig is also unclean; although it has a divided hoof, it does not chew the cud. You are not to eat their meat or touch their carcasses. The Firstborn Animals 19 Set apart for the Lord your God every firstborn male of your herds and flocks. Do not put the firstborn of your cows to work, and do not shear the firstborn of your sheep. 20 Each year you and your family are to eat them in the presence of the Lord your God at the place he will choose. 21 If an animal has a defect, is lame or blind, or has any serious flaw, you must not sacrifice it to the Lord your God. 22 You are to eat it in your own towns. Both the ceremonially unclean and the clean may eat it, as if it were gazelle or deer. 23 But you must not eat the blood; pour it out on the ground like water. 16 However, in the cities of the nations the LORD your God is giving you as an inheritance, do not leave alive anything that breathes. These probally didnt help the cause so much either. Sooo, some comments: my understanding is that whenever it says LORD it refers to Yahwe and not el, and for the last verse…. He really did mean anything that breathes. Children, rabbits, camels you name it

But honestly, If you think about god in a platonic way and not a tribal god, it makes perfect sense, does it not? Like, Yahwe is clearly as tribal as Pan, Baal and Malluck, or whoever the leventine cananite (! Sorry @Daniel, forgot that they are two very distinct cultures), sacrificed their babies to? While NT God seems pretty platonic: https://iep.utm.edu/god-west/#SH2b And this again would make Yahwe… the demiurge 😱

Ty oak, ill check it Out:)

I asked ChatGPT about this book, and it sounds promising. Yoga means unity, no? In the answer i got from god/ai, it seems like thiw book is mostly theoratical. Is that the case, and any thoughts on yoga (as the excersize we westerners now it as), mantras, meditations etc?

It is interresting, but, i wonder If not maybe indo-euro culture in general would be a more logical explanation then zoroastrianism alone? Seems a little far fetched to have traveled that far in that route over such a long time. that makes me wonder that the traits you mentioned might come from before the indo-aryan and indo euro split. Like, greece, the germanic nations etc. share a loooong history of democratic institutions. tacitus mentioned as well that the germanic people had such respect for women, so much that it almost was embarrasing. And in the way they thread their women, they were alone among all of the barbarians (basically non-romans), who they even surpassed in this area. Likevise, women in norse society seems to have enjoyed an enourmus amount of eqauility and rights (all though we shouldnt confuse this with modern concepts of femininism). When it comes to animal conditions… well, the hindus are probally by far the most advanced in this regard, so kudos to them, but i do not belive that european farmers threated their animals like trash either… and animal rights is still something people care a lot about here in Europe. The occasionsl animal sacrifice undouptly took place at times, and can be thraced back to the PIE creation myth im sure you are familiar with. But my sense is, that this was more like the yearly slaughter of a goat at julblot (yule offering) then something they did on a regular basis. By mythologies, the norse cosmos is by far the one im most familiar with, and that seems quite animalistic in my eyes.

From ChatGPT: Marcion of Sinope, a key figure in early Christianity, held unique beliefs about the Demiurge, distinct from traditional Christian doctrine. In Marcion's theology, the Demiurge was seen as the god of the Old Testament, a creator god who was distinct and inferior to the Supreme God of the New Testament. Marcion believed that the Demiurge was a lesser deity who had created the material world and was responsible for the Law of Moses, but was ignorant of the Supreme God, who was represented in the teachings of Jesus. This led Marcion to reject the Old Testament entirely and to focus exclusively on the teachings of Jesus and Paul, which he saw as revealing the true, benevolent God. His views were declared heretical by mainstream Christianity, but they had a significant impact on the development of early Christian thought and the formation of the New Testament canon.

Well, idk. BUT, i think he gets paid, and he pays me. Recipriocity, growth, broadened perspective, banter… Whats not to like;) Me and @Nungali has been PMing for a while, and i am very gratefull for that. Really. He did made me join his cult with help of black magic, where we harras people for their faith and for their faith only of course, (because we are biased and accademics can be wrong (but fictonal Moses cannot)).

She was a socialist as well, witch is just beautyfull. I think part of the point was to show how rigged it could be, and she did pretty well.

It didnt happen

Yes but this is not the buddhist definition. In the western world, rebirth is awakening (or enlightenment), and immortality is divinity.

Rising from the death = enlightentment = immortality = rebirth = change = divinity. symbolism.

By that i meant: living in one of the most hellish places on earth at the time, speaking against the authorities and preaching love and forgiveness, something he knew would Get him killed. Willing to die for his belief instead of sacrifice then, is that makes it clearer.

What doesnt make sense

For me in terms of «saintity» he is the idealized human, peak goodness. I am very intrueged by other teachings aswell: eastern ones, Paganism, philosophy, but mot knowledgeable enough. And there are a lot of great teachers, in every field. allthough as a european, i am undoubtley biased towards him, even tho i wouldnt call my self a Christian i the traditional way.

How about, sacrifice yourself for the sins of the people, breaking the old law and teaching that attempting love and forgiveness towards everyone as the only neccesary key to paradise?

Looking forward to it, could br very interresting

My very uneducated opinion on this. I do not belive that Jesus thought he was God, and i belive that son of God refers to humanity and not Jesus in particular. Christ comes from the Greek word χριστός (chrīstós), meaning "anointed one.» «The word became flesh» Jesus is the logos incarnate. It is about accepting the spirit of his teachings, as opposed to the old testament, that lead to salvation and heaven (metaphorically speaking). You know what the only unforgivable sin is? Sin against the holy ghost, the spark of divinity within you. The New law: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Christ The evil creator: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-evil-creator-9780197566428?cc=no&lang=en&

Whats strange about that? A jewish «rebel» with a following and unique set of teachings likley did excist, but it is also clear that NT is filled with greek philosophy, mystery tradition, sun worship, mithras and so on..

What do you mean by god? Is it a tribal god (Thor, Yahwe, aztec sun god etc.), a platonic God, like the Christian concept of divinity or is it maybe nature or the universe? And where does Christ talk about slavery?

General question: this website is really slow for me today, but my internett is perfectly fine. Any others experiencing similar?

Well, Jesuses platonic/monist view of God stands in stark contrast to the jewish god, Yahwe.