Turnip
The Dao Bums-
Content count
26 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Turnip
-
Hi, does anyone else practice Pangu Shengong, or have any knowledge about the safety or efficacy of the system for healing and spiritual cultivation?
-
Iâm guessing youâre pretty weary of teachers now based on your experience. Actually the night I practiced Pangu Shengong for the first time, I had a dream of googling the name Akshobhya. I remembered it vividly, and googled the name, and it turned out to be a Buddha. It was an unusual dream, as I had never heard of the name, and I hadnât had any dream like that. Akshobhya turned out to be the Buddha of the transmutation of anger/hatred. I looked into him and found a dharani of his, and as far as I know it is okay to recite it without an initiation, so I have been reciting it for a while now. The dharani is said to purify negative karma, and deep negative emotions, protect one from negative entities, as well as fear from rebirth in the lower realms. You can probably interpret this âfear from rebirth in the lower realmsâ psychologically as well. There are two Dharani sutras of Akshobhya. You can find them here starting on page 1,314. https://dharmaebooks.org/kagyu-monlam-book/ Iâm not really sure if there was any significance to me having that dream the night I first did Pangu Shengong. At the time I did think to myself, âThis could either mean that Pangu Shengong is a good thing or a bad thing.â Iâm still not sure, but if there is, maybe reciting the mantra could help you? Iâm not totally sure if itâs really done anything so far for me but I do feel I have possibly gained some benefits. Just throwing it out there incase you have exhausted other options.
-
Thank you for sharing what seems sensitive. I hope you can recover from these things quickly
-
Well the practice is absorbing energy with the help of Pangu. If I could be sure that Pangu (the entity that Ou is in contact with) was purely benevolent, then I would probably continue practice. I canât be sure though, and it just causes more anxiety than relieved it for me, so Iâve moved to practicing more traditional daoist methods.
-
You might be right, but thatâs not the only reason I stopped. To be clear Iâm not totally against this practice, there are just too many unknowns and weird things that I donât really want to risk.
-
I stopped practicing for a few reasons. One is actually out of fear of what you have said. That it was more of creating dependence than actually empowering me. Also the whole thing just seems all about him. The books The Path of Life are about him being this special incarnation of Pangu who is supposedly the creator of humanity. And he was basically possessed by this being. Also, there are some weird sexual and borderline sexually predatory/pedophilic aspects of the books. One part where the entity is describing to Ou the sexual relationship between Pangu and the Chaos. The chapter describes how Pangu sends rays of light and energy into the universe, but after a while this doesnât satisfy his sexual urges, so he then creates many women who he can have sex with to satisfy his urges, which doesnât work, so he creates the human species as whole to have sex with each other. Which I guess was good for a while? And then at the end of the chapter it says that he would go down to hang with the humans and they all loved being around him and bathing in his rays of light, âespecially the young pretty girlsâ. Interestingly the books go on to say how Pangu realized that lust and promiscuity were a major source of evil, and it was after Pangu made a horrible sexual mistake that he decided to reform himself and restrain his instinctual urges for the benefit of humankind. So I guess thereâs a little redemption there⊠While practicing regularly I noticed a huge increase in sexual energy and sexual thoughts. I didnât really like this. Another big reason I stopped was that there was visualization in the practice that I thought was bringing energy to my head and I thought was not good. Additionally, they call him a master but heâs not a part of any traditional lineage. A practice that is just created by a guy who wasnât even trained by a previous human teacher is questionable. Not categorically bad but questionable. Iâm curious though what specifically makes you think that heâs doing all these things to you. Like how do you know he didnât disconnect. What exactly do you mean by âhis influence became more and more controlling and creepy and he would energetically find more and more reasons to stick aroundâ.
-
Thank you so much for this response. Can you tell me more? I would love as much detail as possible if thatâs not asking too much. What about your experiences were bad? Why donât you consider him ethical, and what makes him more of a predator to you? To be clear I actually have stopped practicing Pangu Shengong since posting this, and my questions are in no way oppositional. I just wanna hear your experience and get more information, know what happened.
-
How to know if a practice/path is ultimately beneficial? Can a practice be healing but also harmful?
Turnip replied to Turnip's topic in General Discussion
Thank you so much for this, this is very quality. I didnât even realize dowsing was originally meant to find water underground, what do you know. I will do some meditation using your instructions thank you -
I am interested in anyoneâs opinions or experiences about this. Iâm wondering if there are practices such as qigong, that can be very healing, physically, emotionally, generally make one feel better and happier, maybe even bring about seemingly spiritual experiences, etc, but can have negative âside effectsâ. In that, they take something away from the person. They subtlety disempower the person. They are not ultimately fruitful for the growth of that personâs soul. This leads into a broader question of how do you know if something is empowering you or disempowering you? Is this practice, teacher, activity, truly helping me grow and heal and become a better person, or is it handicapping my access to my deeper self-empowering nature? Tonight I asked Hua Ching Niâs I Ching for advice about how I should find a path to heal myself. I got hexagram 48, The Well. In his commentary, Ni writes: âSome people dig only three to five feet for water, and upon striking rock, dig another hole and then another. With such shallow efforts, water is never reached. An ancient proverb says that it is better to dig one well deep enough to reach water than to dig nine shallow wells which provide nothing. One must willing to work through difficulties in order to reach water. Of course, knowing whether there is water or not is important. On another level, beyond the issues of commitment and perseverance, this hexagram deals with the spiritual achievement of an individual. Knowing where to dig requires a deeper knowledge. Those who rush about digging here and there never allow themselves enough time to "sense" where the water is. Intuition is the result of self-development. Thus, one who is developed depends upon his intuitive and spiritual achievement to lead him to "water," instead of wasting a lot energy searching in many different directions.â The challenge is that if youâre not developed, how would you know where to dig? For every 10 people who say theyâve found a clean well with endless water supply, 9 of them could be drinking dirty water, or the supply could be limited without them knowing. I am in my early twenties and have not dug deep enough in any direction, partly because I donât know where the water is. Maybe itâs part of the process. Does anyone have any words of advice, or experience of their own?
-
How to know if a practice/path is ultimately beneficial? Can a practice be healing but also harmful?
Turnip replied to Turnip's topic in General Discussion
Thank you for the advice and understanding đ Iâll try out those exercises and let you know how it works! -
How to know if a practice/path is ultimately beneficial? Can a practice be healing but also harmful?
Turnip replied to Turnip's topic in General Discussion
Wow this is a really thoughtful response. Thank you. You have a very good read on me and where I'm at. Having my feet firmly planted on the ground, engaged in the world, is not my strong suit. It's tricky because my main reason for wanting to find a good healing practice is so that I can have a tool to help me be in the world more. It's so that I can feel more connected to others, calmer, less anger and shame and fear of judgment. Emotional and interpersonal trauma, psycho-energetic trauma from drugs and hallucinogens, disillusionment, dissociation, nervous system stuck in fight or flight, has led to a desperate search for some type of sustainable relief and healing, eventually to qigong and such, but it seems desperation isn't necessarily the most stable or sustainable platform for these things... Thank you again, you have given me a lot to think about. -
How to know if a practice/path is ultimately beneficial? Can a practice be healing but also harmful?
Turnip replied to Turnip's topic in General Discussion
Thank you, Iâll check that out! -
How to know if a practice/path is ultimately beneficial? Can a practice be healing but also harmful?
Turnip replied to Turnip's topic in General Discussion
Thanks I appreciate it. -
How to know if a practice/path is ultimately beneficial? Can a practice be healing but also harmful?
Turnip replied to Turnip's topic in General Discussion
Thank you -
How to know if a practice/path is ultimately beneficial? Can a practice be healing but also harmful?
Turnip replied to Turnip's topic in General Discussion
Thank you. -
How to know if a practice/path is ultimately beneficial? Can a practice be healing but also harmful?
Turnip replied to Turnip's topic in General Discussion
Youâre right. I just gotta pick something and stick to it. Thank you for the advice. đ -
How to know if a practice/path is ultimately beneficial? Can a practice be healing but also harmful?
Turnip replied to Turnip's topic in General Discussion
Thank you for your advice. I really appreciate it. Iâve never heard the importance of irony but thatâs great, thank you. -
Hi, I just joined. I've been practicing Pangu Shengong for a few months now. Before that I practiced Flying Phoenix for a little bit. Am still trying to map out the whole landscape of spiritual and energetic practices, lineages, systems, and teachers. Have read a fair bit of stuff posted on this site and it seems there's a lot of mixed opinions on these things as well. If anyone sees this and wants to respond, I must ask: What do you practice? Why do you practice? What do you trust? Why do you trust that? Do you know anyone who you believe to be "enlightened" or very spiritually advanced? If so, what about them makes you think this?
-
Thank you for your response Ascetic. Thatâs really cool that you were taught by a Yogic in your Imagination.
-
Thanks VinC for the thoughtful response, I appreciate it. I totally agree on the wonder of children. Iâve worked as an early childhood educator in the past and Iâve told people that working with or raising children is a whole spiritual practice in and of itself đ€Ł. Theyâre like a microcosm of the soul.
-
I was just reading the Wikipedia of Li Zhi, a 16th century Neo-Confucian philosopher, and the philosophy really spoke to me, so I thought I would post this in case anyone else finds it interesting. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Zhi_(philosopher) The Childlike Heart-Mind (tĂłng xÄ«n; ç«„ćż) Li Zhi wrote a considerable amount on the âchildlike heart-mindâ (tĂłng xÄ«n; ç«„ćż). Although someone of a childlike heart-mind was once considered to be someone ânaive, immature, and inexperienced in the ways of the worldâ â and thus âbound to come to a bad endâ â Li uses the term in a different sense, as evidenced by his reference to the 13th-century play The Western Chamber(Xixiang ji).[5] In this play, a scholar and a maiden develop a somewhat âforbiddenâ relationship, have a clandestine and passionate love affair, push through âtraditional barriersâ to their love, and finally marry. In the original telling (from the Tang Period, 7th-10th century CE), these same lovers have a short-lived, passionate romance which takes a sharp downward turn when the scholar decides to leave the maiden, leaving them both with no choice but to marry other people, although not out of âtrue loveâ.[5] In referencing this, Li argues for the ideals of the lovers in the Western Chamber, the âspontaneity, genuineness, abundance in feeling, and passionate desireâ.[5] These are all aspects of Li's childlike heart-mind. Li's works on the childlike heart-mind are thought to be âinnovativeâ yet âmuddled and inconsistentâ.[5] Some regard his seemingly incompatible ideas on the heart-mind as a relativist ethical structure âwhere anything goes."[5][6] Pauline Lee, however, rejects this interpretation, arguing instead that Li's work is useful in allowing us to understand the cultural milieu in which he lived, and that his âphilosophical visionâ bears great âintrinsic value and powerâ.[5] This concept of the childlike heart-mind is not unlike concepts of Li's contemporaries on similar subjects. In fact, Li may have even considered his contemporariesâ terms, namely the âoriginal heart-mindâ (ben xin), the âgenuine heart-mindâ (zhen xin), âpure knowingâ (liang zhi), and âthe infant heart-mindâ (chizi zhi xin).[5] The term âben xinâ comes from a passage in the Mengzi that says that if a person acts in accordance with their âappetitive parts,â even if it is to save their own life and even if the decision is difficult for them, then they have âlost contactâ with their original heart-mind, something which Mengzi believed is a person's âgreatest moral resource."[5] Li Zhi makes a conscious decision not to use this term, preferring instead to use tong xin. This may be due in part to the fact that, while Mengzi believed that the heart-mind was something to be cultivated and nurtured, Li saw the heart-mind as something to be âpreserved,â since, in his view, it is innately perfect from birth. Mengzi also thought that there was a specific âpath of moral self-cultivationâ and that those who had followed this path correctly would all have the same ethical attitudes, whereas Li held that there were many different ways that one could cultivate the heart-mind, particularly through the reading of certain texts or engagement in certain practices.[5] âZhen xinâ is found in the Buddhist text the Platform Sutra, in which it is said to be analogous to the âdeep concentration of oneness,â something to practice while also maintaining a lack of attachment to things.[5] However, the heart-mind, in this view, runs the risk of becoming enmeshed with the Dao if ever it lingers in anything, if it becomes too attached. Ultimately, the heart-mind in this conception is considered to be functioning properly if it is doing things with natural ease, rather than struggling against the natural way of things (or Dao). Self-cultivation plays a role in this idea of the heart-mind, as well, through deep concentration. âLiang zhiâ comes from Wang Yangming's idea of the heart-mind as something that is known through a discovery-based self-cultivation method and as being âdirectly manifested in a faculty of âpure knowingââ (a term which Mengzi used but which Wang means differently).[5] Wang regarded pure knowing as something innately perfect, just like Li's heart-mind, but which was âclouded overâ at birth, akin to the sun being obstructed by clouds.[5] This âcloudingâ could be caused by one's qi if it had somehow become corrupted or soiled, so the aim was to have clear qi by exercising one's pure knowing, something which could be accomplished only through the will. âChizi zhi xinâ is a term used by Luo Rufang meaning âinfant heart mindâ.[5] This idea held the âfree expression of one's natural desiresâ in high regard. Luo believed that a person's feelings âare [their] human nature,â and so the feelings should not be ârepressedâ in any way.[5] Spontaneous expression (expression without thinking about it) is also a part of the human nature, and as long as âartificial obstructionsâ (such as âfalse teachings or excessive meditationâ) do not interfere, the feelings can thrive.[5] To Li, losing the genuine mind could result in losing the genuine self, and anyone who failed to be genuine would never recover their genuine heart-mind.[5] The childlike heart-mind is lost when anything from the outside â be those âaural and visual impressionsâ (even of the âPrinciples of the Wayâ), âknowledge and perceptions,â or the favor of a good reputation while masking a bad one â interferes with it.[5] Li also believed that if a person's childlike heart-mind was âobstructed,â then whatever that person said would not come from the childlike heart-mind, and so would lack âfoundationâ and would not be truthful. This is because, âwhen childlike heart-mind is obstructed, the Principles of the Way that come from outside the self become one's heart-mind."[5] This is a problem because, in this case, everything a person encounters and does with their physical senses is of the Principles of the Way, and so is not arising spontaneously from the childlike heart-mind. Words inspired by the Principles of the Way might sound nice or flow well, Li thought, but they wouldn't have anything to do with the person themselves. Their words would be âphonyâ and so the person themselves will be âphony,â and so too for everyone else until the whole world became like this, eventually leaving people unable to determine between âgoodâ and âbad."[5] Li felt that the childlike heart-mind's âgenuine feelings and desires,â as well as the expression of these, could âconnect one to an abundant and powerful sourceâ which is too great for âphonyâ individuals to comprehend.[5] Because of this, such individuals would turn away from opportunities to deepen their spiritual "vision," and face instead a life of comfort and âblindness."[5] Li notes that early sages had so securely preserved their heart-minds that, when they read and studied the moral teachings of the Principles of the Way, they were able to protect their heart-minds.[5] However, Li was concerned that many students would allow these same teachings to interfere with their heart-minds. This seems contradictory, given that it was the sages themselves who wrote the books of these teachings that, when read and studied, would cause the students to lose their childlike heart-mind. However, Li's justification for this reasoning is that the sagesâ teachings were specific to each student, not necessarily to be used universally. He likened the teachings to medicine, not only in that each one is tailored specifically to the âpatient'sâ needs, but also in that what helps one person might worsen the condition of another.[5]For Li, writings such as the Analects and the Six Classics were not to be understood as the âultimate standard for thousands of generations,â because, he proposed, these texts would not then be direct products of the childlike heart-mind.[5] Although Li does say that the childlike heart-mind cannot return once it is lost, the aforementioned metaphor of âhealingâ might suggest that anyone is capable of recovering their childlike heart-mind, though perhaps not in its original condition.[5] This is partially because our phoniness is our own doing and our own decision, and therefore is not entirely out of our control.[5]The metaphor also reminds people that this particular kind of âhealth,â the recovery of the heart-mind, is relative. Each individual person has certain things that they need to do in order to remain healthy, and these practices are different from person to person.
-
Thanks, that helps a lot!
-
Hi @nyerstudent , I have a few questions. What long term (extraordinary?) benefits have you noticed from your practice? Is there anything about it that stands out in comparison to other practices youâve done? Have you noticed that there is any kind of ceiling to the spiritual and energetic growth gained, or does it continually get deeper and deeper over time? Thanks
-
Thank you! I appreciate the response