ralis

Of course plants need CO2, but their uptake is limited and not infinite like some believe. I agree that forests are being devastated which is a major problem. Fossil fuels are carbon based and when burned release CO2.

The scientists you worked with? Who are they?

The so called solar temp increase is not happening whatsoever. CO2 is the main driver of the greenhouse effect which traps heat.

RICO is a serious charge and could become a criminal matter. I am done with this thread given that the Trump supporters are holding sway here which leaves no room for reasonable discussion.

I guess you are letting Trump off the hook for the RICO trial and underage girl rape trial?

I guess you have seen all the evidence including any depositions and are able to make an unbiased decision? Further, any right wing hysteria and propaganda have no relevance whatsoever.

Hillary has not been found guilty.

Yes there is a lawsuit regarding a rape of a female child who was 13 at the time. Since you support Trump I guess you condone his behavior towards underage girls. http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/federal-judge-orders-hearing-in-donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-case/ http://www.snopes.com/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/ https://www.rawstory.com/2016/10/reminder-donald-trump-due-in-court-after-election-day-on-child-rape-and-racketeering-charges/ http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/donald-trump-scandals/474726/

These are real trials and not some BS you are posting here.

Just another deflection away from Trump's alleged crimes which he is going to trial for and that is a fact. Prove he is a pederast.

If you are referring to me, I am only bringing up pertinent issues regarding balance in this thread. I am acutely aware of the issues surrounding Hillary and Trump. Remember, Trump is going to trial in a few weeks under the RICO ACT; which means racketeering and conspiracy to commit a crime. Also on trial for raping a 13 year old girl. Serious charges!

I am imagining things? Post a link to the lawsuit.

Post to your hearts content Brian. Just because law is a hobby of yours means absolutely nothing. In regards to the warrant, the computer in question is part of another investigation and the FBI must show probable cause to convince the judge to issue a warrant.

Obama is African American in case you didn't notice and you seem not well versed in the history of such treatment here in the US.

A review of the 'Hatch Act' would be apropos before you post such stuff. I posted a few posts ago regarding the 'Hatch Act'. BTW, this is the USA and not the UK.

The noose around the neck of the person in the photo is a reminder of African Americans being lynched.

Comey may have violated the 'Hatch Act'. http://hatchact.uslegal.com/ http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/30/opinion/on-clinton-emails-did-the-fbi-director-abuse-his-power.html?_r=0 Richard W. Painter former George W. Bush ethics head wrote the following.

The event is not private, but a football game between two schools. Both schools are public universities which are not private. Get it? I am not opposed to speech, but when speech becomes inflammatory, then the problem must be addressed.

That took place at a public institution. The University of Wisconsin.

This man was removed before the game between Wisconsin and Nebraska last night. I seriously doubt that most posters here recognize the serious ramifications of so called free speech.

The intent of his comment was clear. I guess it is just hyperbole, a colorful joke or whatever and not to be taken seriously. You expect me to believe that? I reviewed some of the posts that came in today and Joe has told me to "stfu", Karl has labeled me a sexist and I should just by process of divination realize it is all in good fun and humor here. It appears that the so called rules don't apply. Joe's comments directed towards me, is in your view is just more colorful language and forum hyperbole? http://www.thedaobums.com/topic/42339-recent-racist-trolling-and-trolling-against-fundamentalism-and-morals/page-5#entry716616

The comment by Joe was that HRC should be put in an electric chair. A member of this forum? Don't know where you contrived that one.

Political TV? You have no idea what I do in my spare time so stop inferring as if you know something about me. I reveal little as to who I am in this public forum. Further, I never once said who I am voting for and am concerned as to the direction this thread is taking. I brought up the example earlier regarding Joeblast's comments that Hillary should be in an electric chair. I find that neither amusing or useful in the context of this forum. I find it baffling that moderators say nothing in regards to Joeblast's comments, but you have criticized me on more than one occasion. Why is that?

Like I said he violated DOJ policy and you fail to understand that simple documented fact. This thread is a pathetic waste.

Everybody knows it without exception? You just proved my point from my last post.