ralis

This is my last response to you. If one weighs the responses in this thread it is very unbalanced in a negative way toward Hillary. Whenever I post relevant information on Trump there is a backlash in almost every case towards what I have posted, in which certain posters immediately begin piling on the negatives toward Hillary.

You appear to have given him a free pass. Further, I posted reports from journalists, but some respond with hearsay as if such persons have some understanding of the legal process in regards to the latest email revelation. I could care less as to what Comey's politics are, but in this case according to AG Lynch, he acted against DOJ policy. Until that is given clarification, then all comments here are BS. Comey appears to be engaged in electioneering. No, I don't want your opinion unless I see a more balanced discussion here which must include Trump's transgressions, which I stated earlier. BTW, I am tired of the veiled or overtly stated hate towards a woman that is a presidential nominee. Whether it is on this forum or from Trump during several debates.

I would never make a generalized statement such as that. There are many in the Trump camp that fit those descriptions.

The public has a need to know exactly who Trump is. I imagine the women that have come out in public may have been threatened and told to keep quiet. Rape victims are usually ostracized and not taken seriously. Take for example the recent rapes and sexual abuse at Baylor University and the coverup by the coaches and administration. Kenn Starr was the president and participated in a coverup.

Let me put it this way, Hillary is taking far too much abuse from the patriarchal authoritarians. Trump was stalking her on stage during the debate as well as spewing other accusations that were nothing but dog whistle demagoguery. BTW, I don't care what his emoticon denotes and his comments are not humorous whatsoever. My partner just read it and she found no humor whatsoever.

The trial begins in December. However, even an alleged accusation of rape of any woman let alone an underage girl is shocking and why very few question such on this forum, is beyond me.

Tongue in insult cheek? Really? That is the most out of bounds comment I have heard tonight. Did you read his mind and determine intent? I happen to take what he writes at face value.

Investigation is not an indictment nor has she been tried in a court of law. Only in the court of public opinion.

Don't lecture me on what constitutes hate speech. I know very well what is happening on this forum. Several threads have been locked due to anti-Semitism and one person suspended. Joeblast stated earlier that Hillary should be in an electric chair. This is the type of speech that is out of bounds here and if you fail to understand the far reaching ramifications of such, then you are living in denial.

edit

You deny the hate speech that is piled on here which is directed towards her.

Why not include the hate mongering toward Hillary Clinton in several threads on this forum? One poster today was calling for her to be put in the electric chair! These comments are not just personal beliefs, but are hate speech.

I am stating the best reporting I can find. However you state nothing but useless humor. Obviously you are part of the pile it on Hillary gang for one reason, she is a woman. Moreover failing to properly vet Trump and giving him a free pass.

The problem with this thread is a vast denial of Trump and his misogyny, lawsuit for alleged rape of a 13 year old, alleged organized crime involvement etc

You are not a lawyer and have no idea. Further, you are part of the gang here that piles on a female candidate every chance you have. A warrant is required.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/justice-officials-warned-fbi-that-comeys-decision-to-update-congress-was-not-consistent-with-department-policy/2016/10/29/cb179254-9de7-11e6-b3c9-f662adaa0048_story.html?wpisrc=al_alert-COMBO-politics%252Bnation Washington Post article for further details.

The Attorney General said he broke DOJ dept policy. Read before you state an assumption. Probable cause determines whether to proceed. https://www.yahoo.com/news/comey-wrote-bombshell-letter-to-congress-before-fbi-had-reviewed-new-emails-220219586.html

He is part of the DOJ and any investigation needs a warrant. Besides, this could be construed as electioneering.

The FBI director failed to obtain the legal clearance from the DOJ and may have broken the law. Further, he has no warrant to read the emails in question.

Three in Florida, Virginia charged with voter fraud. Police arrest a person for loitering/electioneering around a polling place in Texas while others were arrested for tampering with votes. One person voted twice and was arrested. These are all felonies with sentences of at least two years. Wonder how many of these were Republicans and totally loyal to Trump. Like I said, it is illegal to loiter around polling stations. http://www.rawstory.com/2016/10/three-in-florida-virginia-charged-with-voter-fraud/

Will try to explain that later. Perhaps this weekend.

Really? Just throw in a few ad hominems which proves? Your narrative is based on one video and I am required to accept a vast criminal conspiracy orchestrated by thousands without further evidence while your posts towards my character are disparaging in the very least? To repeat, in this country, voter intimidation is illegal at the polling places!

The US military/Pentagon has been selling and giving away armament for decades which is the job of the military industrial complex. I was in the military during Vietnam and I know first hand how it all works. Nothing new at all.

As I said, no one can film me inside the voting booth when I am voting which is called voter intimidation in this country. You showed one video and extrapolated that into gigantic proportions.

The so called beliefs that are exchanged are generally veiled racist and anti-Semitic speech which are inflammatory as seen in the threads in question.