ralis

Did you grow up during the cold war and have to hunker down under your desk for nuclear war drills? I did and I take what any presidential candidate states in this regard very seriously! None of us really understand the horror of such a scenario except the few that survived Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

Who said I was voting for her. Bad move on your part. FYI, one nuke anywhere on this planet and the game is over which is far too much for most to understand. That is a 'game theory' scenario.

Have you considered Trump's fantasy with nukes as a first strike? I doubt you have or understand the reality of such. His speech has consequences and yet most have no concept of what that means.

It remains futile that any reasonable discourse is futile when one's mind is absolutely fixed on a certain outcome. Not one person including you has discussed Trump's fantasy of using nukes as a first strike. Trump's rhetoric is such that his idea of being a unitary executive gives him ultimate power.

I don't hate this country in the least. I served 5.5 years during Vietnam. Did you ever serve? Or afraid to? Hillary was never found guilty for Benghazi and yet no one discusses the Benghazi's that happened during the Bush years.

A cut/paste for expedience sake.

I don't have an account on that site.

You really underestimate my intelligence and critical analysis. Stop your condescending bantering to anyone in disagreement! "The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings."

The last time I looked, one is supposedly innocent until proven guilty in this country, except, for the dilettantes here on this thread who get a charge out of playing judge, jury and executioner! Trump is the 'law and order' presidential candidate who wants 'stop and frisk' and toys with the powerful fantasy as to what the possibilities are with nukes. If nukes are used, then the game is over!!!

Prove in a court of law that she is a criminal! Otherwise, your narrative is not based on facts but conspiracy and innuendo. If not Hillary, then Trumps fantasy regarding nukes, should give any thinking person frightful pause!

She has not been indicted in a court of law and therefor she is not guilty as you wish. Only the right wing conspiracy sites are deeming her a criminal. For a supposedly grown adult, your writing style and profuse use of so called colorful language serves no one but yourself.

Please refrain from the "You've got to be willfully ignorant" BS. What you are posting is nothing but unfounded allegations/conspiracy and your distaste for a woman running for president. Further, I guess you don't mind and support Trump who has a fantasy regarding the use of nukes as a first strike capability.

Tough guy talk does not make a statesmen but quite the opposite.

Trump was rude and kept interrupting. That is the way he treats women, which BTW, has been well documented as to his misogynistic remarks over the years.

Trump has stated to the effect; "if we have nukes, why don't we use them". That is a paraphrased statement which has been fact checked as accurate. He has not ruled out nukes against ISIS. If that happens, then game over.

Trump has no plan except that he sees himself as some sort of unitary executive that has ultimate power to do whatever he wants.

You are wrong given the recent ruling. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/13/nyregion/stop-and-frisk-practice-violated-rights-judge-rules.html Further, you are not a constitutional lawyer no matter what you believe yourself to be. The question becomes, do you support this unconstitutional policy? What if you were stopped and frisked and put in prison for no reason?

Trump wants better racial relations and in the same sentence wants a nationwide 'stop and frisk'. That policy discriminated against a very high percentage of African Americans. That policy was ruled unconstitutional which was based on racial profiling.

I watched the debate. It is obvious that Trump has very little or no understanding of the implications of speech. His diction/grammar is fractured and repetitious. Not presidential in the least.

Is Trump illegally diverting money from his charity to his own pocket? If so, then his charity is nothing but a slush fund. Trump directed $2.3 million owed to him to his tax-exempt foundation instead https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-directed-23-million-owed-to-him-to-his-charity-instead/2016/09/26/7a9e9fac-8352-11e6-ac72-a29979381495_story.html?postshare=2761474922583336&tid=ss_tw

What does that say about this forum?

My alma mater is 'The Ohio State University' where football is higher than religion. I was born with scarlet and grey blood.

Professional sports offer upward mobility for a few.

Actually he has admitted such in this thread.