ralis

I have hiked in grizzly bear country in the Grand Tetons and never had an encounter. But this would be freaky scary.

I ignore nothing! I wait and see how it all plays out as opposed to the 'chicken little the sky is falling' hysteria that some fall into.

I am willfully ignorant? Which implies that I choose to be. I seriously doubt it.

She has walking pneumonia (Mycoplasma) in which symptoms are mild and can seem like seasonal allergies i.e, coughing and sneezing. Hysteria and conspiracy from adults on this thread is laughable. And, some of your are cultivators which has done nothing to cultivate critical thinking and questioning ones thinking.

Pit Viper venom?

To set the record straight, Hillary has pneumonia. Stop the hysteria. http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141570415

What happened? He was really young.

I am well aware of that. Thanks professor.

If you are referring to Constitutional originalism that some are purveyors of, then the US could easily go back to slavery, deny women the right to own property and deny voting to anyone that doesn't own land.

If I remember correctly, Namkhai Norbu stated in the beginning of his early Yantra Yoga book that pranic energy is dicey and must be carefully cultivated. He seemed to imply it is more potent than Kundalini.

I would appreciate further elaboration.

Just found our email exchange which was quite lengthy. You sent me a PM which started the conversation etc.

As Taomeow stated in a previous post that shields don't always work.

It was you. I remember that.

As for myself and some abilities that have come natural to me, via cultivation, are being able to send healing heat (electrical voltage moving through my head and flowing down) at any distance and at times have been able to see inside another and see a physical problem. I was becoming very accomplished with this healing technique and so much so that the energy was way too powerful and became very ill overnight. I stopped the practice back in 1993. Although I have recovered, there are lingering physical effects. I post this as a caveat to anyone who thinks energy is a warm and fluffy process.

I remember that in the past when you first came on this forum that you were selling your idea of having a friendly healing chat with anyone that was interested. Given the nature of the exchange that I had with you in the so called friendly healing session chat, I feel that it wasn't a so called healing session but something entirely different. Are you qualified to transmit such or are you a collector of practices and do whatever you feel? Qualified in that you can see deep into another and be certain as to the effect of such a transmission? Further, I doubt there are many on this planet at this time that have reached the level of being an authentic shaman. A lot of wannabes are prevailing.

This thread fails to include the myriad lawsuits against Trump, payola to the Florida AD, ripping off employees, not paying contractors and so forth.

The group in question is politically conservative and does not represent all physicians as futuredaze implies. Further, why this group has not questioned Trump's mental health? Hillary has been harassed more than any politician, in part given that she is a well educated, intelligent women. Seems sexist to me. BTW it is unethical for a physician to even opine in this case. The public tends to believe physician authority figures and in this case will accept the opinion as fact.

It is unethical for physicians to make public a diagnosis without the consent of the patient. Moreover, these physicians are not her doctors. This has happened in the past in which such allegations has lead to lawsuits. Your above statement is flawed in that the 71% figure does not represent all physicians, but a small conservative organization. Your post and others constructed in the same manner are insulting to intelligent persons. Addendum, I just glanced at the article in question and you cherry picked what you wanted persons reading this thread to believe.

You expect one to take this condescending preachy lecture seriously? What you view as a serious text on the lustful evils of sex must have been written by one with severe character armoring/sexual and emotional suppression. Your lecture has no standing in this thread.

How can one trust one whose speech rarely makes sense. Further, provide medical exams and evidence to prove your claim. Otherwise your argument is based on hearsay and propaganda. It is easy and disingenuous to toss around terms that you don't have a clue as to their meaning.

First time I have heard of a specific 'Light Group' here. Do they have their own sub forum?

Absolutely. Being upfront and responsible while having clear intention is a win win scenario as opposed to the zero sum game that some play with energy.

To provide a little balance to this lopsided thread.