ralis

Here is but one aspect of an authoritarian fascist state. Note the propaganda and symbolism being used to manipulate the masses. Even Hitler's entrance from the air was carefully staged for maximum effect.

You are absolutely correct! These guys have no interest in reading historical accounts or even political theory.

One can use any phrase, but to imply that I said something that I did not is not appropriate.

Fascism is based on authoritarianism, extreme nationalism/patriotism, the interests of the state takes precedence over the people, the use of symbolism as a rallying point, dissolution of unions and state corporate collusion to name a few points. The genesis can be seen in the authoritarian city states in Italy before WWII. This political ideology is right wing. Unless you have studied the subject in depth such as I, it is quite possible to be mislead by many revisionists.

This is in regarding gendao adding to what I wrote not anything to do with Karl. Link; http://thedaobums.com/topic/38911-socialism-does-work/page-6#entry636248

I don't recall asking you personal questions.

Here is what I stated; Gendao adds the term 'Socialism' which misleads others in this discussion. That is all I am concerned about.

I know names are not included in this, but to ask about parental relationships such as what gendao seems to be obsessed with is unethical. And to indulge his curiosity for what end?

@Brian, Are you going to weigh in on this situation from a few posts ago? To misrepresent what I wrote is wrong. http://thedaobums.com/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=636248

A priori is what the universe is built on? That seems to imply a creationist theory. What does that mean or have anything to do with this discussion. If you care to know what my views on fascism are, then why not read the thread that I referred to. My definition is based on historical evidence combined with my understanding of fascism. I am not inclined to do your thinking for you. Although, I will provide a short abstract later on. However, the subject is extensive and complex.

You referenced what I wrote in a previous post and made it appear that I stated something different which I did not state! (Socialism is actually driven by greed, rugged individualism and selfishness.) That is dishonest and possibly against the rules of this forum.

Is the Von Mises model based on statistical analysis with short and long term probabilities? Or, inferences based on a priori arguments? From reading your narrative, the latter is what you are basing your belief system on.

History is opinion? That denotes an absolute untenable statement. For instance, the historical fact that the U.S. Navy while docked in Pearl Harbor was bombed on Dec. 7th 1941 is a fact and not opinion. In what way did Mises presuppositions succeed?

You are discussing the use of logic out of context. So far you have made generalized statements based on opinion with no deference to Mises. So far you narrative has no basis. If you have a need to defer to logic, then put your dialectic in proper logic form. Further, the use of a priori arguments are moving away from the discussion regarding socialism as a working system in the real world.

A little cold hearted!

There are millions here in the U.S. that are unable to afford high quality health care. The free market Libertarians are convinced that health markets are in the best position to decide health care choices. Insurance companies just move money around and decide what is payed while taking massive amounts for CEO pay and are more concerned about profit than human need. Stephen Hemsley of United Health was paid 48.8 million for one year. Absurd amount of money for a CEO. http://www.forbes.com/pictures/eggh45jef/stephen-hemsley-of-unitedhealth-group/

I read you post. Yes, I do what I can to help others.

If charity to the homeless person is not given, then who will provide it? If no provisions are made then a homeless person will die on the streets, which is a social problem.

Governmental regulation is a necessary force to implement rules for the game. E.g. contract law, electrical, building and plumbing codes, environmental laws to stop pollution, to name a few. I don't think I need to elaborate on the benefits of such requirements.

Most have little use for powers of reason and will vehemently deny such and resort to arguments based on emotion. Critical thinking skills are on the decline here in the U.S. The use of historical information in books is absolutely appropriate whereby one is comparing and contrasting academic analysis and historical fact. Personal opinions have no basis in such discussions.

I am not interested in your condescending remarks. Without references to academic and historical works, then my posts are incomplete. Read the thread referenced if you are interested. Otherwise, you are changing the subject. BTW, I am well educated and will not fall for specious arguments/non sequiters and whatever device you use to manipulate the discussion.

Free is a misnomer and implies one can do anything one pleases without limit or legal ramifications. Stop twisting the argument. Black markets exist here in the U.S. also.

I agree.

I am discussing where selfishness has been a force for the negative here in the U.S. I can cite many occurrences of.

Pure capitalism/free markets are illusions and not based on logic or reality. State one instance where free markets have worked.