ralis

Please define the time length of an eon. Whenever I see the term eon, the implication is longer than the present age of the universe. The human species has only been around approximately 200k years.

Rachel Old?

The amount of energy required would be enormous for this transfer. However, is mind potential energy which no one understands its potential and use?

You pose some very good points. There is belief in an atom less body which is a pure rainbow body. That leaves me at a complete loss. As far as dessication of bones is concerned, perhaps salt will not shrink any appreciable amount. I would very much want to see this phenomenon with my own eyes.

The problem I have with all this is that only the select elite are allowed to see this phenomenon. Why not let real investigators come into these places and document these events with unbiased investigation.

The bodies appear dessicated to me. The human body is approximately 70% water. Remove the water and the body is dessicated.

This is a difficult subject/problem. Will the process actually beak down physical matter into light? That process would take enormous amounts of energy, which in physics is called the 'conservation of energy and momentum'. As Mulder always said in 'The X-Files', "I want to believe".

There is a least one Jesuit that is conducting research into the 'Rainbow Body'. http://noetic.org/library/audio-lectures/the-rainbow-body-phenomenon-with-father-francis-ti/

If I remember correctly, there is a practice of packing the bodies of these Lama's in salt which will shrink the body.

Is English not your first language?

Very broad again and evasive. Please explain what you mean.

That is a very broad generalization. The natural world? Are you implying that humans are not part of nature?

Distraction from?

What facts do you base that assessment on? For someone in the legal profession or so you claim, your ability to state a reasonable argument doesn't show. I have friends that are well educated scientists, lawyers and academics. I am well acquainted with well thought out discussions.

A well founded argument is based on creative ways of stating one's position as opposed to repeating memorized phrases. Your arguments are based on the latter.

I can give transmission for that. Very secret!

Every Buddhist I have had discussions with generally use the same verbiage. Circa 800 A.D.

I have been in several retreats with Norbu starting in 1989.

It is obvious by the canned responses by the Buddhist's here that refuse to lighten up and critically think. Maybe even question your belief systems BS? Goldisheavy is asking very intelligent well thought out questions and you are not able to engage him in an intelligent manner.

Seems like a form of attachment to be so serious and grim in regards to secret transmissions. Although Norbu has repeatedly stated there are no secrets except in the realization of the transmission.

I am poking holes in your Buddhist logic and the same old responses are deferred to.

He is taking himself way too seriously.

Why the Tibetan name; Ösel Dorjee? Spiritual consulting? I thought only spirits could consult, which is why it is called spiritual. Sounds like big bucks for a minute of your time.

Your statement implies that a sentient being has a prior existence which contradicts Buddhist teachings and therefore suffering is implied. That is an absolute statement which has no proof. The rest of the statement has no definitive proof.

I am getting a lot of 404 errors on that site.