ralis

That would be nice since there are several here that just want to play the 'me' game and not be generous to others.

David Gilmour is still my favorite guitar player. Too bad Pink Floyd is no longer.

Most of what I see on TTB anymore is the 'me first' and 'I am not going to share my toys with anyone'. Most here are not that way but the sentiment is toward focusing on 'separate beingness'. An unwillingness to help others on the path.

Most are into holding onto their ultra advanced secret teachings that their parental guru said was forbidden to share under pain of displeasing their guru or whatever their issues are. Or on the other hand, the ones in question may know nothing.

I posted the first part of this awhile back and here is the rest of it by the late great Roy Buchanan. Austin City Limits.

I don't have an agenda one way or another. I just want to get this right. My mention of Johari being from the North of your country is that his teaching is different given the different region he is from.

Johari was from Northern India.

What I am saying, using 'is' leaves out a lot of possibilities as opposed to one extreme view which you seem to adhere to. You have not provided links to the so called conspiracy of Soros, Rockefellers et al. I am challenging generalizations. I guess that you have no proof of the conspiracy. When I was very young I believed in such worldwide conspiracies as an emotional response. Then I realized that was no longer important. There is more to life than worrying about who controls the world.

Harish Johari is wrong? Page 44 'Tools For Tantra', he uses the ng sound for all the bija's.

Thanks for posting this response. I am avoiding any discussion with JB for the reasons you state. 'Chest beating' being apropos in this case. I stated a very good argument with extensive references in the 'Canadian Tar Sands Thread' and I stand by that.

I am aware of that but you made other implications as always.

Sanskrit is still used either in academics or rituals. There are no local Brahmin priests in my area so stop harping on this. Furthermore, Latin is used in science and medicine. Neither are dead languages as you want to believe.

That is news to me given that I looked up that pronunciation in several places for correct Sanskrit. Are you saying that Sanskrit is specific to Bengali. Seems as if their is a disagreement between regions. Please give more detail.

JB, I am not OT.

You are making a lot of claims. Show me your peer reviewed research. Are you a climatologist? I doubt it. Your use of 'isness' indicates that you want absolute answers. I have kicked the addictive habit of using 'is' in my writing. Rarely will you see me use it. Authoritarians love using 'is'.

Limbaugh joking? Seems akin to hate speech. Furthermore, you still don't provide evidence to back up your claims. Just personal opinion. By the way, stop posting in caps. Rudeness.

Limbaugh uses that with his condemnation of anyone wanting to protect the environment. I guess he means it as a term of endearment. I don't believe it. As of now, you have not provided proof of your conspiracies nor will you.

It is still cherry picked and commented outside the purview of the research. I read the article and the researchers are making observations and say nothing to the contrary about AGW. Principia is an anti AGW site. What you are doing is leaping to conclusion without evidence.

Your posts are replete with hearsay and innuendo with no supporting evidence. BTW, Witch isn't here to defend herself so stop the personal attacks directed to her. Persons that resort to arguments such as yours have no credibility whatsoever.

What is being proposed is some worldwide conspiracy to defraud the public on AGW by climatologists. Conspiracies rarely work with two people let alone thousands.

Links on use of supercomputers used by climatologists. http://www.dailycal.org/2013/04/16/berkeley-lab-scientists-to-use-supercomputer-for-research-on-genome-clean-energy/ http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/25/4129026/clouds-are-hiding-the-the-truth-of-how-much-earths-climate-will-change http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9232382/Climate_change_research_gets_petascale_supercomputer http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/10/17/1030641/october-17-news-climate-scientists-gain-access-to-worlds-most-powerful-supercomputer-for-geosciences/ http://industry-news.cray.com/supercomputing-key-to-meaningful-developments-in-climate-research/

You have offered no proof of that and what you post remains your opinion. In both your posts. My academic background is science and math and I hold to a higher standard than your conspiracy BS. You obviously don't know what you write given that your posts are replete with the use of 'is'. Using 'is' only reinforces narrow minded rigid dichotomies of thought which leaves no other possibilities.

I did a little research on these guys and their papers have not been peer reviewed. That was obvious when you posted the above. Why should peer review be important to proper scientific endeavor? Outside the critical peer review process, anyone can write papers and present such as absolute fact. Many persons not well versed in proper research believe the above nonsense.

The non-linear equations are modeled on 'supercomputers' which only a few research facilities are equipped with. Where do you obtain such nonsense?

The above posts are more of the same non critical thinking from ones that have no or very little scientific education and will believe cherry picked data and papers presenting so called new evidence, which in this case are not peer reviewed papers but the papers presented are assumed by readers as absolute evidence against AGW. The above posts, cut/paste arguments, rely exclusively on naive foolish readers to believe the absolute 'isness' of the above. In proper scientific research, a degree of uncertainty <1 will be obtained. At some point in time when you both clear your minds of foolish absolute thinking, we might have a reasonable discussion.