ralis

Was your wife tested?

There are a number of Coronavirus species in nature. This one is new (novel) which is more easily spread among the human population at large. MERS and SARS are related, but the communicable transmission percentage was not that widespread. I would suggest reading instead of positing unfounded suppositions. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/index.html

Thoughts and prayers? Since when did that have an effect?

Persons fleeing that may be infected/exposed is a serious problem! Millions left Wuhan after the source of the virus was revealed. Massive quarantines should have been in effect!

Go right ahead and read whatever confirms your bias. I don’t have time or inclination to research bullshit conspiracies which are driving more wedges in this culture. Limbaugh, Alex Jones, James O’Keefe, QAnon, and others are the purveyors of lies as well as propaganda. I question authority, but know what are lies and propaganda.

Since you have difficulty in reading, the Rothschild’s are Jewish.

I am aware of that, but I am stating this virus as well as all others occur in nature except what is engineered in bio labs.

The virus occurs in nature from animals. All viruses naturally occur in nature!

‘Scientists have debunked the bio lab conspiracy and have mapped out the DNA sequence of this virus in order to create a vaccine. In other words, this virus occurs in nature. Just wait until the permafrost melting releases microbes and viruses that have not been studied or identified.

Now you are joining in on the anti-Semitic conspiracy that Jewish bankers, Rothschild’s, are controlling the money supply. That is an age old conspiracy.

That is a preposterous assumption based on nothing substantive.

For one that is always seeking help on this forum and you claim to belong to this order? Why not beg to them for help as opposed to taking up space here!

You are autistic? I have had more than my share of vaccines and I am just fine. What would the world be like if Small Pox was not eradicated via vaccines? It is a matter of public health or for the good of all to prevent communicable diseases.

Sean set down rules regarding conspiracy bullshit being posted here. No more!!

The first scene in “American Hustle” makes the point in this discussion.

Why would the US or any government deploy a bio weapon where most of the world’s manufacturing is located? Supply chain disruptions, Dow Jones is tanking, the global economy is at risk. We are not living in a James Bond movie where the bad guys are planning world domination!

Please define which is conspiracy and which isn’t.

Just blame the entities which are your own nature anyway? Groveling before your own self.

The threads that he has started are all the same problems over and over. He must want attention!

How do you know you aren't beyond space and time? Why do you differentiate between internal and external?

As Namkhai Norbu told me back in 1989 is that these beings you refer to are your own nature and not external. Get used to it.

I am not interested in contradictory game playing that borders on 'double binding' in any way whatsoever! Furthermore, the novel corona virus was mentioned in your opening post and I responded. I suggest you read Gregory Bateson's work on 'double binding' in order to more effectively communicate in a reasonable manner. tut-tut; expressing disapproval or annoyance. I did shaking medicine for a few years and found no difference in my immune response!

It seems to me that most here are anti vaccination? Shaking as opposed to vaccines? Most vaccines have a very high efficacy rate and if enough persons are vaccinated, herd immunity will protect the population. Small Pox is a virus and is no longer a threat due to vaccines, not shaking!

COVID-19 is apropos to this conversation given that it was mentioned previously on this site and it is important for all to keep abreast of this potential pandemic. Also no amount of shaking will prevent a virulent infection such as this virus! Stop the condescending remarks as if your opinion is absolute!

In listening to the second video it was immediately clear that the author is very good at gaslighting! The speaker states, "something that we can all agree on" is a technique to draw in listeners to agree without question. After all, what sane person wants to go against the perceived consensus?