-
Content count
2,049 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Everything posted by h.uriahr
-
I'll donate towards a healing from Mak if it's a money back guarantee..if not then ANYTHING else BUT Mak..unless Goss really wants the help from Mak
-
NOTE: Regarding the recent matter of "open letter"
h.uriahr replied to Mak_Tin_Si's topic in General Discussion
Hey smartass why dont you explain why the holocaust happened? No one has said anything about you helping him FOREVER. The joke is on you Mak. -
NOTE: Regarding the recent matter of "open letter"
h.uriahr replied to Mak_Tin_Si's topic in General Discussion
So if the battle was so intense that someone wouldve died atleast they got payed right?? We can talk about money and demons and fairies and unicorns and flying puppies all day long but look at what is on Mak's site. Donations to the temple helps the temple to run and help the temple to create opportunity to heal those who need help with. Just by donating will create good karma for you because the donation could be used to save many lives and bring fortune to many other people. Therefore, we say donating to the temple create good karma that is countless and infinite. Gung Duck Mo Leung. Did you the catch the part about how the donations they receive help to heal those who need help with it? The site says they do charity work but Mak must not know that. -
NOTE: Regarding the recent matter of "open letter"
h.uriahr replied to Mak_Tin_Si's topic in General Discussion
A Jesus believer does not HAVE to pay. Alot of church goers do tithe however. Does the church ask money from the homeless they feed? NO. Does the church ask money from the homeless they preach to? NO. Is tithing monetary? NO. Tithing, in the past was hardly ever money, it was food. The people could pay tithes with FOOD. You didnt mention anything about Buddha. Shocker -
Possibly the most controversial figure in world history. I certainly believe he went to India.
-
I personally find it annoying because he couldve posted all his FU under one topic. Not write a topic about every FU known to man
-
I know someone who is unable to accept any payment for healing. With that said, payment is fine but if someone is too poor to pay money then dont turn them away. At the very least, as you said, physical labor is fine. Christ wouldnt refuse someone because they are both poor and physically incapable, neither would Buddha. I read your post on your fees. You shouldnt assume things Mak. Have you been a broken down homeless man before? Have you asked a manager at a McDonalds if they could spare a hamburger because you havent eaten in days? I didnt think so. You sound like youre involved in a corrupt temple if you offer no charity to the poor Mak. You seem pretty intelligent for being so ignorant. I guess it's the yin yang concept you teach. Obviously you live by it. You know that many, many churches hold fundraisers just so they can feed the homeless and they expect anything in return? Finally!
-
I think Mak has brought up some interesting topics. What is a bit bothersome is that he wont help a fellow bum in need. Not that he's obligated.
-
Pre Madonna, Adios Stop posting, it's that simple
-
NOTE: Regarding the recent matter of "open letter"
h.uriahr replied to Mak_Tin_Si's topic in General Discussion
Jesus and Buddha healed the poor. I understand that you are of course, not either one of those people OBVIOUSLY. It's fine to take donations and fees but do you honestly turn someone away because they are dead broke but need service? -
If it makes any difference I think it's annoying as hell finding nothing but his topics when I actually DO log in.
-
Someone should design a sister site called Luniebums.com or Quackedbums.com
-
Oh so I have to pay you to get you to say which hormones in the body are yin and yang?? HAHAHA.....
-
HAIR PIE!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
-
Question about spirituality and scientific testing
h.uriahr replied to seekeroftruth's topic in General Discussion
You are very welcome -
I prefer Gun-Jitsu
-
Question about spirituality and scientific testing
h.uriahr replied to seekeroftruth's topic in General Discussion
similar but not the one I was talkin about. -
I think he meant show off skills when he said parlor trick.
-
the best way is the way that works. whatever that may be.
-
That website reminds me of other sites...no offense meant http://www.roaringlionpublishing.com/ http://www.chikung.com/index.html cool poem
-
Lol I can see it now...Buddha feeds the homeless, stops by the hospital and heals everyone then logs onto youtube LMFAO> Ok seriously though......can anyone answer, whose ever been to a real deal monastary, whether or not they have computers on site??? My whole thing is that ultimately technology is a downfall. We have way WAY more artifial light in the world than we used to and we also eat CRAP and are basically in a downward spiral. The computers, tv, etc are screwing us all mentally. Take cellphones for instance, all the kids have them knowadays and it's screwing up their writing because of all the txt msg.
-
I believe enlightenment is an emotional, mental, physical thing that happens all simultaneously. Not sure if that's the rainbow body or not but I dont think it's possible unless youve reached a mental state in whatever form of meditation you do but physically you have to be far along too, and emotionally steady. The mental triggers the physical and emotional but it's more or less simultaneous. Not sure if that's what MP means or not but my views are probably similar
-
Question about spirituality and scientific testing
h.uriahr replied to seekeroftruth's topic in General Discussion
Ok ok ok ok ok....look how about this....how about IF someone goes around OPENLY shouting or displaying an ability like an ass ( which is what Stig basically said) then arent they basically obligated? I think so. If I could do the things like John Chang can then I would say I'm obligated to be tested. I do think John had good intentions with his video but others I think are doing it falsely in hopes for monatary gain. If I were to be an extremely humbled master like Buddha, Christ or even on a lesser level like John then I certainly wouldnt be parading around throwing fire at everything and skipping on water, etc. I do think that maybe for those without faith, testing should be allowed because as I recall (JUST AN EXAMPLE PEOPLE) Christ allowed someone to touch his wounds after his resurrection. However, if someone is mending mortal wounds with thoughts or touch then testing is an insult and they would hopefully teach openly. When I say mending, I mean blatently obvious healing that's an impossible act ( Under normal day to day western world circumstances). The down side to testing is that a person who can do all of the above things, once tested by some off the wall scientist, and it catches media attention, if they happen to be in a country with a corrupt government then the government will obviously want more info and maybe even kidnap and restrain the person because you know aswell as I do that some would want the power and try and use it militarily. I know this is going way off but if you CAN mend bones and you CAN start fire and you CAN walk on water, etc etc, then it could certainly be possible for someone to become bulletproof or to even be able to project qi with the lethality of a firearm, etc. -
It turns out you do need a master for iron palm.
h.uriahr replied to mewtwo's topic in General Discussion
Lol ok so I've punched many many windows back in my day as a drunk and my fists have always came out FINE but the thing is....maybe I'm a master at iron palm but I'm certainly not an iron forearm or iron elbow master because those are where I got my stitches.. I know I'm not an iron first practitioner nor a master. -
Question about spirituality and scientific testing
h.uriahr replied to seekeroftruth's topic in General Discussion
The last place I would go if I had a mere interest is a forum. What you seem to keep missing is the fact that by using pyrogenesis you are doing something internally to make that happen and unless you personally can do pyrogenesis then you have no idea whatsoever as to whether the practitioner has any gain from performing it. You call it showing off but is it not good practice, or is it not healthy physically for the person? You can spit out your little analogies all day long and make it appear as though you can or cant do something but you slipped up and spilled the beans. If you dont know what's going on internally all you can do is speculate and call it SHOW. What video were you speaking about earlier when you said you could project qi like in the video??????