gendao

Enlightenment is simply Ourself waking up in this dream. Of course, simple =/= easy...

Wow, awesome. Could you tell me about Type Bs too? I also looked into the diet before, but was turned off by how many foods I like to eat that are banned for me due to their "lectin" content. So, I wish it IS BS! If not, I guess I can change...but I'm ideally moving to sprouts next anyways...

Donna Eden gives a great routine for hitting some key acupoints in her videos. 45tLuqMrup0 In fact, 2 of her main ones are the "heart points" under the clavicles just outside of K27 (5:20). I like to hit both K26s or K25s with my middle finger and thumb at the same time using a "crab pincer" hand.

I need a good integrated view of the microcosmology and subtle architecture of the human body. How exactly do all the chakras, dantiens, nadis, meridians, acupoints, etc correlate and tie together? And how many of these similarly-located highways and landmarks are actually the same...or different structures? Here's a few threads already on this: Meridian basics Accessable Self-Acupressure, all channels Chi vs. Prana, Meridians vs. Nadis, Chakras vs. Dan Tiens, What IS the difference? Subtle body anatomy of tan tiens and chakras How Do The 7 Chakras Related to Tao? Compare Dan Tien to Chakra? Are some chakras really off the centerline? Djwal Kuhl & Esoteric (chakra-based) Acupuncture esoteric (chakra-based) acupuncture sessions review Dao Zhen on Dan Tian I feel like I've learned a lot of related knowledge & viewpoints over the past year, but have yet to really understand, syncretize and reconstruct them all together into a grand, universal standard. I think our modern dilemna is being left with all the shattered fragments of an ancient glass mirror. Sure, each tiny shard is still a piece of the truth, but without being pieced together, we cannot fully see Ourself in it. Only one tiny bit at a time... So, how does it really all tie back together??? What is the skeleton key to this great Mystery of mysteries?

I disagree totally... When you start clearing out unresolved issues, you have to go back to the root cause. And many times, that root cause incidentally lies back in some past life. Therefore, following the yarn back into past lives can have great therapeutic value. And in fact, if you don't go back far enough to the root cause, you may not be able to fully resolve the issue. In the course of self-therapy and just trancing out, I've uncovered a number of past lives.

Well, I was waiting for this folks...problem -> reaction -> solution. The economic 9II is devaluing all global fiat currencies past their tipping points to hyperinflation...which now "justifies" the implementation of a NW0 global "super currency." This will become the lifeblood and unifying factor for the NW0.

He says some good things, but could also be an attempt to co-opt the "conspiracy theory" truth movement as a "concern troll." The fact that 9II was an inside job is a lynchpin of the political upside (not left or right, but above the fray). But with his whole site here, he is using NLP to reinforce the official story that 9II was still a radical Muslim attack on our "freedom." Although to be fair, I'll realistically take what I can get and even Ron Paul won't publically expose 9II as a false flag op. Unfortunately, the majority of career politicians willing to take swings at this NW0 foundational pillar are...either foreign or retired.

Al-kduh is by the C1A. And "mole"hill pun intended - considering that OBL was trained by the C!A himself...

Scalar waves Orgone Qi ORMUS Monoatomic elements Zero-point energy Mobius coil Dual vortex Torus Double helix Yin & yang Tesla Coral Castle Crystals Somehow, how does this all fit together?

Hmm, cool concept about the chakra acupuncture. I'd love to try it. Well, sometimes you have to explore both extremes to find the middle. With you, it sounds like you were naturally more feminine at first, so overcompensated with too much machismo. Eventually, that didn't work out so now you're swinging back to your feminine, but perhaps overshooting here now too. But now, you're ready for another swing back closer to zeroing out. I think the key here is to find and integrate the positive aspects to both halves. At first, you fled the "weakness" of femininity. Now, you still reject the "homo" aspect, but have come to embrace the sensitive spiritual side. Likewise, prior you explored the "abusive" chest-thumping side of masculinity - which you now reject. So, what I think you need to do is explore the positive masculine aspects and then integrate that with your positive feminine traits. So, what are some good masculine traits - that help balance out female traits? Why are we here? What are we good for? Why do women need us? What happens when there's too many women but not enough men?

Wow, cool sessions! Is there a site for esoteric acupuncture? Sounds like something I'd like to try out... What do you mean by seeds in your ear, tho? Anyhow, it's not easy being a man in the feminist era. We've been brainwashed and guilt-tripped into essentially hating ourselves - or our masculine selves. As a result, it's easy to attempt to disassociate that side out of shame and to fit in. v5hvl0I1DuY It personally took me several years of researching all the anti-male propaganda (via PU & MRAs) to finally wake up and learn to stand my own ground as a man. Ironically, something that women innately want in men anyways. Then I kind of went off in that extreme for a while, but have now gradually found the Middle Way through that with a more balanced centering. Thing is, everything has 2 sides...and if you only choose to see 1 than that is your own confirmation bias. Like, you think ego and stupidity is only with men? Uh, ever heard of Britney Spears, Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan, Octomom, Miley Cyrus, Amy Winehouse, etc? These are your typical "All-American" Disney role models for girls today. But, do you really think they are less egotistical or smarter than their "beer-guzzling" male Hollywood peers?

Kunlun didn't help me, but ThetaHealing gave me a spontaneous instant healing from severe myopia in my right eye...albeit temporarily for about 5-10 minutes. The crazy thing is I don't think my eyeball magically changed shape, so I still don't really know how it worked.

Right, well your "complaint" actually fits into my physics/electrical analogy. You don't think he's undeserving of any praise, just felt he got some undue praise. IOW, you felt like he received more out of the grid than he had put in. Now, we can all argue over that, but that's beside my theoretical point here.. Unfortunately, the knee-jerk human reaction is too polarized to recognize such subtle discrete graduations - and instead quickly becomes a "for" or "against" duality with nothing in between. But with my "electrical grid" analogy, you can take some of the emotion out and mechanically analyze each operation with greater precision. Then it simply becomes a matter of balancing the books between what anyone gives and takes off our grid. It doesn't matter if they charge or "whether praise is public or private." The bottomline becomes simply subtracting what they took out from what they put in and seeing what the net result is. Or that's my 2 cents I'm putting in. You all can feel free to disagree.

I agree, if you can do better for cheaper - by all means show it! Otherwise, backseat drivers are a dime a dozen who when asked to show what THEY can do...suddenly find every excuse under the sun why they can't show anything. I think going back to my physics POV, the BOTTOMLINE is not whether you charge or not...but what your NET DELTA is. Are you putting into society at least what you take out? Putting in even more, or less? The key here is the net +/- change, not whether you charge at all. For example, if it cost me $50 to build a shelf and I sold it to you for $40, I actually "gave" you $10, not "took" $40 from you. I think with Santi, most people here would agree that even though he charges, he actually ends up putting far more into the grid than he takes out. He's a net generator. So in essence, he is still a positive addition to this world - and we are all better off with him here. I know GIH's initial point was different than this, but just wanted to try to shed some more light on this whole generic issue. Because it's one that has surfaced a number of times.

Sure, but how many people have actually been able to manifest stuff consistently at will - in human history? Only a few...and it took each of them a LOTTT of time and effort to develop that ability. So, until you reach that level, I think you may still have to do a lot of things manually... Problem I've seen with a lot of jobless "manifesters" I know is that that when they come up short on funds, the money tends to "manifest" out of employed friends' and family's wallets. And again, although they are "too spiritual" to make money the hard way...they're not "too spiritual" to accept it from those who do. This is like someone who won't bloody their hands killing animals themselves for food, but will gladly eat meat provided by a hunter who does the dirty work for them.

Why not, then? If you truly rely on God? Shouldn't you just sit down at your table for dinner tonight and just wait for a meal to manifest there for you? If not, then aren't you also relying upon yourself? I didn't mean to take God out of the equation - but I think with co-creation you still have to walk along with "Him." Which does take effort and self-reliance on your part too. I'll agree to disagree with you on the system, then. Although, from my physics perspective, I can actually find a theoretical way out of our mess. As opposed to Obama's hyperinflationary "quick fix." Since this equation holds tight for a closed system...if you opened or expanded it with the input of "free energy," then you could relieve the energy/monetary deficit. Which goes back to Tesla, Coral Castle and zero-point energy, etc... So we are talking about a real paradigm shift here though, not just more shell games.

CZ - I agree. You are not relying upon the system, but yourself first and foremost. Basically, I think people "should" put in at least as much as they take out of the system. If not, then they become a drain and others are forced to support them. Good for them, but very bad for the system and everyone else in it. And that on a large scale, in a nutshell, is what ends up causing welfare states and our current economic collapse today. Again, people drawing more energy out of a system than they are putting in = depletion = debt = death. It's no different than depleting all your qi faster than you can replenish it. And what our country has become today is the equivalent of jacking off 10X per day while doing no restorative qigong ever.

Isn't dana still just passing the buck though to wage workers who clock in regularly to paid gigs, though? I mean, it's not really coming out of thin air from "God." Somewhere along the line, someone probably made that money working hard plying his trade around before he "donated" it to you "from God." I know someone who basically uses "manifestation" as an excuse not to work a job. But, they essentially just end up bumming stuff from people who do and also living off an inheritance...from a deceased relative who made money the old-fashioned way. So, the money wasn't really "manifested" per se, just received from others - relying upon friendly favors and the kindness of strangers. And these same jobless people who find it beneath themselves to "work at something they don't love doing," have NO problem accepting donations from people who are working out of personal responsibility, not sheer passion for their work. Which ultimately is unbalanced and unsustainable macroeconomically. Because you get worker bees grinding to support themselves - and a few others who are "too good" to do the same work - but not too good to enjoy the fruits of such work by others... (Unless they have something really great to share back.) Generally, I think people should do whatever it takes to at least support themselves first. If the whole world did that, we'd all be in much better shape. Freedom and the pursuit of happiness should always be balanced with responsibility. Then after that point, feel free to do (or not do) whatever the hell you want.

Post a video of yourself punching. PHt0JYfgVGY

That's pretty horrific... Although I believe they're actually speaking Korean, not Chinese.

I don't know how much of its effect it's really lost, as I am sure it still works enough to justify its use. I sell on eBay "a lot" and have learned to price everything $X.99, because it really does seem to boost sales. However, I see this as a WIN-WIN situation - because BOTH the buyers and sellers benefit. The seller gets to sell more, while the buyer gets a few cents discount. Really, isn't this a perfect solution? Or would you rather Chris charged you a nickel more?

Is the current spinning in a vertical loop like a waterwheel, or a horizontal circle like a clockface lying flat on the ground?

On p115 (of TBFM), you state that you traded your "ability to copulate at will" to channel that sexual energy into your brain. And that once you start the sublimation process, you don't want to interrupt it (by ejaculating) too much. On p54, you state that the sublimation thus has a debilitating effect, at least during the first phase. And on p132, you quote Gopi Krishna referring to "statements of the kind that during the process the semen dries up with suction and becomes thin, that the male organ shrinks, or that the sexual appetite is lost." Now, I believe Glenn Morris also alluded to some sexual problems (or changes) from his kundalini awakening that contributed to his divorce. Also, didn't Buddha's dick withdraw into a flap of skin after he became enlightened or something? So, my questions here then are: 1) Does your dick shrink or lose erectile function during the kundalini-awakening process - presumably as a result of the life force being used for your own rejuvenation (rather than shot out your dick for that of a potential baby's)? 2) If so, would your dick return to normal size and function after your kundalini has been awakened? 3) Do you have to conserve your jing even after your kundalini has been awakened? And if not, what happens? Does your brain get foggy and your rejuvenation slow? 4) Might kundalini-awakening actually make (non-ejac) sex easier by clearing the way for the "Big Draw?" Cuz reality is for us single fellas out there, women are still going to be a lot more impressed with a sizeable, functioning unit than a spiritually-awakened man. And ideally, I'd like to have both.

Nah, keep 'em comin' mang! Great stuff! In fact, I wish more people here would post videos. So much more interesting than reading plain text...especially when you are showing movements.