RongzomFan

Absolutely not.

Absolutely wrong. Mahayana has nothing to do with nibbana.

This is esoteric Christianity: http://www.esotericarchives.com/

tummo>>>>meditation

Real yoga, hatha yoga, is from the Naths. Not Patanajali. Nath yoga and Vajrayana yoga are from the same sources.

"Emptiness" in the context of the inseperable clarity and emptiness of the mind, means you cannot point to clarity with your finger. You cannot find clarity, nor get rid of clarity. It does not refer to regular emptiness.

You claim to be a kundalini master. I know you charge for this information on your website, but just give me a little bit of info to prove you are the real deal. I tried to read your previous threads but I got lost between the aliens and the New Age style terminology.

This is the strongest endorsement for Pure Land Buddhism.

Nagarjuna and Candrakirti.

Have you heard of phowa?

Pure Lands are merely bardo experiences. Praying to Amitabha generates a nice bardo experience, where one's wisdom manifests as a Pure Land. And its part of Dzogchen: http://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&ie=UTF-8#hl=en&q=Amitabha+Pure+Land+Dzogchen&ion=1&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbm=bks&source=og&sa=N&tab=wp&ei=RFMcUejFLa3y0wGJ74HwCw&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.42452523,d.dmQ&fp=5a1a69dc710b288&biw=926&bih=747

Only the tantras of Vajrayana and Dzogchen are definitive anyway.

I don't think you understand Pure Lands at all. Pure Lands are merely bardo experiences. Praying to Amitabha generates a nice bardo experience, where one's wisdom manifests as a Pure Land.

I think your arguments are full of contradictions. You say you respect Dzogchen. Dzogchen has Pure Lands. End of thread.

How do you figure? Its the same stuff.

This book is at odds with most scholars. Read the works of Bronkhorst. Buddhist meditation and Upanishads are both from Shramana. This review of your book is insightful. http://www.westernbuddhistreview.com/vol5/the-origin-of-buddhist-meditation.pdf

Are you referring to yourself? Have you not researched Dzogchen tertons' experiences in various Pure Lands? You denigrate Pure Land Buddhism, while claiming to respect Dzogchen. You are a mess of contradictions.

This is esoteric Christianity: http://www.esotericarchives.com/

Buddha defined God as the Creator, just like most people do. And he denied there was a Creator.

If I don't see that you quote historical sources and the tantras, our discussion is over unfortunately.

Because Buddhism is not just the teaching of Shakyamuni. It includes the teachings of the Mahasiddhas as well.

Thats hilariously wrong. Where are the rainbow bodies? Give me a break.

Shakyamuni taught nothing like Dzoghchen. If you think he did, you don't understand Dzogchen. Dzogchen isn't "naked awareness." "Naked awareness" or kadag is only 1 out of 3 wisdoms of rigpa.

Of course I have a Vajrayana bias. Just like all the Indian masters at Nalanda, Vikramsila, Odantapuri etc.

But I don't care what Shakyamuni taught in the first place.