RongzomFan

You don't have to have theories. This stuff is already well understood.

Tantra is my main interest. Read everything by Oxford scholar Alexis Sanderson, who is cited in many Hindu and Buddhist academic books: http://www.alexissanderson.com/publications.html

Kundalini is the same as tummo. Kundalini / tummo is pranayama and bandhas. I am talking about authentic Kundalini: http://www.khecari.com/styled/index.html

Those don't count. Hare Krishna, Swaminarayan and Sai Baba temples are not real Hindu temples.

Songstan, If you are big Shakti guy, have you ever been to a Hindu temple?

Please don't write a book.

I don't know why people think this. Its completely false.

Yes you are an inanimate object

No, its pretty basic Vajrayana

You keep emphasizing Shakti, but you haven't mentioned the ultimate Shakti practice i.e. shava sadhana

Kundalini and candali are the exact same thing. Kundalini is found under many names in Hinduism, so the name isn't important.

Books are useless. We have direct introduction.

no it has to do with the five pure lights

sentient beings are merely loci of ignorance.

Also, are you going to have sexual yogas?

So you are creating some new hybrid system, which you have also mentioned in previous threads. Will your new system have direct introduction? If so, are you going to travel all over the world giving direct introduction?

Research demonolatry. Which means offering blood to Goetia demons and making pacts. I don't recommend it though.

oh gawd

He is pretty consistent on emptiness. I believe when he said D.O. is not paradoxical, he was only referring to literal translation of pratītyasamutpada.

bump

Whats funny about SJ's statement?

If you google "campus gang rape" you get all sorts of western gang rapes