RongzomFan

Are you Gatitio going to tell us what you know??

Yes.

bump

Yes, sure.

Anytime, within century?

He dug himself into a hole, didn't he?

bump for a response

Are you going to tell us what you know??

Does anyone know what this guy is talking about?

http://books.google.com/books?id=0z02cZe8PU8C&pg=PA313&dq=krishna+a+sourcebook+He+describes+Krishna+as+an+avatara+of+Vishnu/Narayana,+indeed&hl=en&sa=X&ei=JVGhUsCSOc_lsATU04DwAw&ved=0CDQQuwUwAA#v=onepage&q=krishna%20a%20sourcebook%20He%20describes%20Krishna%20as%20an%20avatara%20of%20Vishnu%2FNarayana%2C%20indeed&f=false

You are probably talking about recognizing the nature of the mind. We have that too.

Adi Shankara believed in Krishna and Vishnu. Are Krishna and Vishnu verifiable?

You just dug yourself into a huge hole.

Really? Brahman is verifiable?

I did a CTRL+F for Direct Path, and got shit

I'm sorry you feel that way. Even South Asian scholars treat these subjects quite seriously: http://www.thlib.org/collections/texts/jiats/#!jiats=/01/germano/b8/

LMAO

Only for the mystical aspects like transmission and terma. http://thetaobums.com/topic/32153-mystical-buddhist-readings/

There is still no "Direct Path" Wikipedia article. Why don't you go make it?

And?

No. You claimed I made up the term NeoAdvaita. So I had to point out there was a NeoAdvaita Wikipedia article.

Ralis, we've has this same exact discussion before. Don't pretend you are falling out of your chair. Unless your old age is affecting your memory.

Yes, and?

Why not?

You are assuming I am out to prove the divinity of primordial terma, when I'm not. Its called faith. http://thetaobums.com/topic/32153-mystical-buddhist-readings/