RongzomFan

More on the Nath sect to which Buddhaguptanatha belonged: http://academia.edu/1466213/Nath_Sa_pradaya_-_entry_in_Vol._3_of_the_Brill_Encyclopedia_of_Religions

There is a view that Mohammed never existed.

Buddha Nature of the tantras i.e. Mahamudra refers to the nature of the mind. Buddha Nature of the sutras i.e. Tathagatagarbha Sutras is some weird convoluted doctrine.

What Buddha Nature are you talking about? Are you talking about the Buddha Nature of the sutras i.e. Tathagatagarbha Sutras? Are you talking about the Buddha Nature of the tantras i.e. Mahamudra?

Its the theology of Islam, and its history. Look into the Islamic burning and decapitation at Nalanda, Odantapuri. Look at sharia law in Britain. Look at Al Jazeera's piece on the Dalai Lama a few years ago.

The media is biased by Abrahamic religions. They will never understand Buddhism. I used to be an evangelical saved Christian for about 2 months, so I understand their mindset. I used to be even anti-Buddhism.

Dzogchen has Amitabha, Pure Lands, bardo practices etc. So if you criticize Pure Land Buddhism, you are a complete hypocrite.

No shit. Dzogchen is even different than Mahamudra.

I read the book. He says its a British construction quite plainly. Read it for yourself.

Even top western Ivy League scholars say caste is a British construction. For example refer to Columbia dean Nicholas Dirks’ Caste of Mind (Princeton University Press).

Romila is a woman.

Romilla Thapar is a discredited historian. No point in even reading it.

Wow. Ask historians. Not me.

Yep Harvard people are silly for doing such a study. And the most prestigious journal, Nature, is silly for publishing it. That's sarcasm by the way.

You are crazy to even compare China to India. When is China going to give Tibet back? You consider the thread subject as insignificant. Yet you continually post in this thread...

Yes a 2009 Harvard genetics study is propaganda. There was also more propaganda from a Stanford genetics study.

You are putting more weight on this stuff than me.

that's ridiculous. more hating on India as usual.

Not for historians http://www.amazon.com/India-A-History-Revised-Updated/dp/0802145582 http://www.amazon.com/A-History-India-Hermann-Kulke/dp/0415485436/

I'm not going to indulge in your straw man arguments and logical fallacies. If you are not interested in history, move on from this thread.

If it doesn't matter, how come the Aryan Migration Theory is in every recent history book? Obviously historians think this shit is important.

I do not care about the youtube video. I did not post the youtube video. The youtube video is a new twist on the Aryan Migration Theory. He is merely making it much, much earlier. Earlier than even the Indus Valley Civilization.

If there is no Aryan migration, India is itself the source of Indo-European language / culture / religion.

Wait till the Muslim population of Britain increases even more. They are already calling for sharia law.