Owledge

I immediately thought of Eckhart Tolle. They both seem to 'get it'. A thought that arose during watching the video is that that which has no beginning and no end might actually have them, but as long as you are created by it, you can't see past this creation. The Dao is like a canvas, and when you project a movie on it, then of course for the charakters this canvas is inconceivable to them. I mean we are so small and knowledge is infinite, no? How can we say that the Dao is the greatest and most amazing thing? We know nothing! And I mean the enlightened people, too! OK, they made this major step where suddenly they know and understand everything. But this everything is just a feature of the Dao, and if there is something even superior/higher-level than the Dao, even enlightened people have no clue about that. Saying that the Dao that you can grasp is not the real Dao is maybe too big of a statement for us. Just for phantasizing... Imagine a begin that has CREATED the Dao and is amused by all the enlightened beings in it seeing it as "everything". By the way... that's something that I want to go deeper into in my life: Going beyond everything that has been talked about already and exploring the things that are so far away that not one word has been spoken about them yet. Whenever there's a something, think about where it might have come from. NEVER limit yourself there. Even "The Dao" can become a restricting dogma to us.

I tend to believe it's fake, because there are many details of the execution that could have contributed to it. Not very convincing. (The pencil thing was so lame!) Tying that heavy things to her skin, shouldn't she also be able to move things from a distance?

Totally!But I have never heard of anybody who can sing while sleeping ... and while it sounds nicer than snoring, it's still hard to sleep with someone at your side singing.

Great way of talking about your experiences! People often say it's impossible to describe these things, you have to experience them, but I say you can always try your best.

The JFK assassination was most likely initiated by the power-hungry vice president Lyndon B. Johnson. Look up the name "E. Howard Hunt". But maybe LBJ was just a puppet, because JFK made the elite bankers angry by 'meddling' with the monetary system. Furthermore... I think Osama Bin Laden is dead ... probably since December 2001. Either died from kidney failure or killed by Omar Sheikh, like Benazir Bhutto said on the BBC (that part was cut out later) a month before her assassination.

In a very old thread Yoda wrote about getting more out of music due to Kunlun practice. I noticed that, too. My listening behavior has changed and I'd say you can also do this intentionally: Listen to the faint sounds! Ignore the obvious ones, especially voice. (You won't overhear them anyway.) You might experience the vibe or atmosphere of the song in a powerful way. I heard sounds in music that I never heard before, although they should be easily noticeable! The intensity of this effect varies, though. I think I'm too tired right now.

Wasn't it the orgonite-like components of the paint?

You might get a vague (possibly correct) answer by combining areas of knowledge like homeopathy, scalar wave devices, quantum physics and some other in that area.From what I read about psychic/energetic devices, apparently you can build a device that focuses and amplifies your will. And then you surely can do it with only your body, too, as well as charging things with effects created by your intention.

Moon landings: The FOX piece was lame physics and logic. Was totally debunked. Later there was another documentary about the >plans< to fake it if necessary, but this docu had something dubious about it. Maybe it even was a film experiment about credibility or something.

Didn't understand a word, sorry. But no problem. Well of course there are different possibilities. It could be that the numbers say something about the future, or about the present/past, or that I really look for them, or that me looking for them causes them to occur. Do you remember the Star Trek episode where Data gave himself in the past an unlikely amount of 3's by altering that time (or something like that)? I wonder whether the writer of that episode got the inspiration from thinking about numerology.

Ehm... What exactly is a FU?

How is this saying used in english language?Because it seems to be a reference to a metaphor from The Wizard of Oz meaning to keep the dollar's gold standard.

About the electric car thing: It's not really difficult to introduce revolutionary new technologies as long as you create a business model with nice dependencies around it and invite the 'dinosaurs' to partake. The electric car thing in general is not that 'green'. The chemical industry will be very happy about the huge amounts of big batteries they can produce, and the sources of the electricity are also not as green as marketing propaganda tells us, partly because their energy density is just weak. I've read about several conversion kits in the USA to make your car run on gasoline and water, without meddling with the engine control software. If it is no fake, then I think it's the same technology that you could use to run it purely on water.

By saying things like that you're inviting people to test it to the extreme.

I recently stored roughly 150 browser tabs from The Wanderling to a separate session file to keep the RAM use of Opera below 1 GB. I once tried to contact him via e-mail ... forget it. But I've found my path now.

Phew! Didn't read the whole thread. Looks like you work through all the points again. Loose Change is a rather old film about 9/11, no? I already didn't like it back then. I think the political aspect speaks for itself, so actually it is not really necessary to talk about physics. It saddens me to see such a lack of understanding about physics. No sense about reality, about how the world works. And then there are people who say that talks about holograms (no real planes) are disinformation by the government to make the 9/11 truth movement appear ridiculous. Sadly, those ideas could easily have been created by 'truthers'. There is a video on Youtube that so much speaks for itself and is like a concise lesson in 9/11-physics. I thought it was widely known, but that seems to be not the case. RwAhkRciO7k

Today's numbers... Compare it to the above, especially the 77s.

I thought Heribert Illig's thesis about the fake 297 years was relatively accepted among historians, but all the talk about 2012 and such... If it is true, shouldn't it be trivial to prove it by looking at the sky, by checking the stars? I couldn't find that out yet. And if Illig's thesis is not valid, then how can we explain all the indications/evidence he found out? And would Illig not have checked that by himself? I mean... no matter what fakery was done to calendars, the astrometry should be a very reliable calendar, no?

Yeah, got the 9:11 several times, too. 'My' special times are rows of numbers, but several years ago when it all began, it always was 22:22. And many times I didn't have the clock in my field of view at all before looking at it. I get the vague impression that out 'inner clock' is very precise.

@Pixie Did you look "Taoism" up in the Wikipedia? It should be obvious, but I ask because sometimes people are looking for a webpage on the internet and I have to tell them about that secret trick of using a search engine. ... all a matter of practice.

Here... things like these are bugging me: They happen very often. Maybe I'm just over-sensitive (=crazy).

Only happens with this one:

In many situations I think about these two alternatives; whether it is better to fight/help or to leave it alone and work on myself. Often it is a dilemma.

I can't play the video*; Please give me a short briefing. Thanks! * I won't repeat the mistake of installing a newer Flash player. Messy software.