Mark Foote

Is Daniel ex-communicated, for the nonce? T'was not so much the topic, as Daniel that I was concerned with losing. He was pretty clear that he didn't respect authority based on transmission. Can you blame him! From a post I'm working on for my own site: Gautama refused to name a successor (DN 16, PTS vol. ii p 107). His advice was to go by the words of the teacher rather than any claim to authority, to compare the instructions of a teacher to the sermons Gautama himself had given and to the rules of the order that Gautama himself had laid down (DN 16 PTS vol. ii pp 133-136). At the same time, activity solely by virtue of the free location of consciousness, the sign of the fourth concentration, has been conveyed by demonstration in some branches of Buddhism for millennia. The transmission of a central part of the teaching through such conveyance, and the certification of that transmission by the presiding teacher, is regarded by some schools as the only guarantee of the authenticity of a teacher. In the days before his demise, Gautama gave one final piece of advice to his followers on who to trust: Look not for refuge to any one besides yourselves. And how… is (one) to be a lamp unto (oneself), a refuge unto (oneself), betaking (oneself) to no external refuge, holding fast to the Truth as a lamp, holding fast as a refuge to the Truth, looking not for refuge to any one besides (oneself)? Herein, … (one) continues, as to the body, so to look upon the body that (one) remains strenuous, self-possessed, and mindful, having overcome both the hankering and the dejection common in the world. [And in the same way] as to feelings… mind… mental states, (one) continues so to look upon each that (one) remains strenuous, self-possessed, and mindful, having overcome both the hankering and the dejection common in the world. (DN 16; tr. PTS Vol II p 108; Horner’s “body, feelings, mind, and mental states” substituted for Rhys Davids’ “body, feelings, moods, and ideas”) Like the man said: When you arrive at last at towering up like a wall miles high, you will finally know that there aren’t so many things. (“Zen Letters: the Teachings of Yuanwu”, tr. Thomas Cleary, p 83)

A topic was closed by a moderator, no doubt because the discussion turned into a personal exchange. I'd like to suggest that one of the parties could have left the discussion, at least temporarily. There are things that warrant serious further consideration, on both sides, but the poster did request that the party he had issues with leave the discussion and instead of that, the topic was closed. How does that help the poster to make use of the forum? We are here to learn, as was the poster. Ok, off my soap box. Just didn't think it should pass without comment. Looks like the topic has been restarted... hmmm. Appears that the individual whose post was "closed to further replies" has now been banned from the forum. There's a weight on you But you can't feel it Livin' like I do It's hard for you to see it Was I hurt too bad Can I show you daylight How could I be sad When I know that you might Look out for my love, look out for my love Look out for my love, look out for my love Look out for my love It's in your neighborhood I know things are gonna change But I can't say bad or good (Neil Young, "Look Out for My Love")

... is lacking transcendence. "What is transcending transcendence?" requires transcendence. That's what makes this question difficult. The daughter's response is transcending transcendence--it's also "being down to earth": Layman Pang was with his whole family sitting around the fire. Layman Pang suddenly said, ‘Difficult, difficult—ten bushels of oil hemp spread out on a tree.’ Mrs. Pang said, ‘Easy, easy—on the tips of the hundred grasses, the meaning of Zen.’ Their daughter Lingzhao said, ‘Not difficult, not easy—eating when hungry, sleeping when tired’. (“Zen Letters: Teachings of Yuanwu”, trans. Cleary & Cleary, pg 41) However, the Chinese teacher Yuanwu who offered the story went on to say: Usually when I relate this story to people, most of them prefer Lingzhao’s remark for saving energy, and dislike what Old Man Pang and Old Lady Pang said about difficult and easy. This is nothing but ‘making interpretations by following the words’. People who think like this are far from getting to the root of the fundamental design. (ibid) But tell me, what is the most essential place? How is effort applied? (Yuanwu, “The Blue Cliff Record”, Case 55, tr. Cleary and Cleary)

Can you quote a source on that? I'd love to be able to cite it, with friends.

Using a forked branch or two l-shaped rods, a water witch will hold their chosen tool while walking slowly across the land. As they move over the water source, the tool will move, indicating where to dig or drill. Some dowsers can even specify the depth at which to drill. https://blackflash.ca/expanded/how-to-dowse I can say that certain things stand out for me, with regard to moving from the source. From my own writing: The presence of mind can utilize the location of attention to maintain the balance of the body and coordinate activity in the movement of breath, without a particularly conscious effort to do so. There can also come a moment when the movement of breath necessitates the placement of attention at a certain location in the body, or at a series of locations, with the ability to remain awake as the location of attention shifts retained through the exercise of presence. (Appendix–A Way of Living) If I can find a way to experience gravity in the placement of attention as the source of activity in my posture, and particular ligaments as the source of the reciprocity in that activity, then I have an ease. (Applying the Pali Instructions) The idea here is that the consciousness identified with the self, with “I am”, must be allowed to move freely in the body, while a presence of mind sufficient to retain one-pointedness is mustered up. If the presence is mustered, there’s a feeling of ease connected with one-pointedness, and a sense of gravity (“towering up like a mile-high wall”, as Yuanwu used to say) that allows the automatic activity of the body to proceed solely by virtue of one-pointedness (and the location of one-pointedness). (My Advice) My advice would be to look for consciousness to move away from the head in the moments before falling asleep, then allow for that same freedom of movement in seated meditation. (from a pending post on my own site) My abbreviation of Gautama's "four arisings of mindfulness": 1) Relax the activity of the body in inhalation and exhalation; 2) Find a feeling of ease and calm the senses connected with balance, in inhalation and exhalation; 3) Appreciate and detach from thought, in inhalation and exhalation; 4) Look to the free location of consciousness for the automatic activity of inhalation and exhalation. Bear in mind: But usually in counting breathing or following breathing, you feel as if you are doing something, you know– you are following breathing, and you are counting breathing. This is, you know, why counting breathing or following breathing practice is, you know, for us it is some preparation– preparatory practice for shikantaza because for most people it is rather difficult to sit, you know, just to sit. (“The Background of Shikantaza”, Shunryu Suzuki; San Francisco, February 22, 1970)

Nothing to see here, folks, move along.

Look not for refuge to any one besides yourselves. And how… is (one) to be a lamp unto (oneself), a refuge unto (oneself), betaking (oneself) to no external refuge, holding fast to the Truth as a lamp, holding fast as a refuge to the Truth, looking not for refuge to any one besides (oneself)? Herein, … (one) continues, as to the body, so to look upon the body that (one) remains strenuous, self-possessed, and mindful, having overcome both the hankering and the dejection common in the world. [And in the same way] as to feelings… mind… mental states, (one) continues so to look upon each that (one) remains strenuous, self-possessed, and mindful, having overcome both the hankering and the dejection common in the world. (DN 16; tr. PTS Vol II p 108; Horner’s “body, feelings, mind, and mental states” substituted for Rhys Davids’ “body, feelings, moods, and ideas”)

I have no experience with either of those symptoms. What posture do you meditate in? Something else that I wrote: In one of his lectures, Shunryu Suzuki spoke about the difference between “preparatory practice” and “shikantaza”, or “just sitting”: But usually in counting breathing or following breathing, you feel as if you are doing something, you know– you are following breathing, and you are counting breathing. This is, you know, why counting breathing or following breathing practice is, you know, for us it is some preparation– preparatory practice for shikantaza because for most people it is rather difficult to sit, you know, just to sit. (“The Background of Shikantaza”, Shunryu Suzuki; San Francisco, February 22, 1970) Suzuki said that directing attention to the movement of breath (“following breathing… counting breathing”) has the feeling of “doing something”, and that “doing something” makes such practice only preparatory. Although attention can be directed to the movement of breath, necessity in the movement of breath can also direct attention, as I wrote previously: There can… come a moment when the movement of breath necessitates the placement of attention at a certain location in the body, or at a series of locations, with the ability to remain awake as the location of attention shifts retained through the exercise of presence. There’s a frailty in the structure of the lower spine, and the movement of breath can place the point of awareness in such a fashion as to engage a mechanism of support for the spine, often in stages. (Shunryu Suzuki on Shikantaza and the Theravadin Stages) The idea here is that the consciousness identified with self, with "I am", must be allowed to move freely in the body, while a presence of mind sufficient to retain one-pointedness is mustered up. If the presence is mustered, there's a feeling of ease connected with one-pointedness, and a sense of gravity ("towering up like a mile-high wall", as Yuanwu used to say) that allows the automatic activity of the body to proceed solely by virtue of one-pointedness (and the location of one-pointedness). If the placement of attention is not through a necessity of breath or posture (or more) that comes in the course of an inhalation or exhalation, then the automatic activity of the body is inhibited. Might even result in a headache, but I'm guessing, as that's not a symptom I've experienced. Ta-chi said, “How can you produce a mirror by polishing a tile?” Nan-yueh replied, “How can you make a Buddha by sitting in meditation?” Ta-chi asked, “Then, what is right?” Nan-yueh answered, “When a man is driving a cart, if the cart doesn’t go, should he beat the cart or beat the ox?” (“Dogen’s Manuals of Zen Meditation”, Carl Bielefeldt, p 195-195, UC Press ed. 1988) To rephrase my earlier advice, keep a presence of mind with the location of consciousness right before you fall asleep, see where the mind goes.

You're very welcome. The best of my writing on the subject is here, if you want more details: A Natural Mindfulness I hope to be around, if you have any questions--I'm just trying to teach myself, if you really want to know!

Alibaster perfume vase, Tomb of Tutankhamun, 14th century BC..

Sorry I don't know. Can you elaborate? Do you practice anapanasati? Yes and yes, although I should say that what I practice is my understanding of the actionable elements of Anapanasati. Here's the fifteenth element, from F. L. Woodward's translation of the "Chapter on Inbreathing and Outbreathing" of the Samyutta Nikaya volume five: Contemplating cessation I shall breathe in. Contemplating cessation I shall breathe out. (SN 54.1; tr. Pali Text Society [PTS] vol. V p 275-276) The mindfulness recounted in that chapter is exactly the mindfulness recounted in Anapanasati--I prefer Woodward's translation of the elements over Horner's rendition (in PTS MN 118), but the sixteen elements are the same in both places. There are various cessations mentioned in the sermon volumes. I believe the cessation that was referenced in the fifteenth element was the cessation of the activities: …I have seen that the ceasing of the activities is gradual. When one has attained the first trance, speech has ceased. When one has attained the second trance, thought initial and sustained has ceased. When one has attained the third trance, zest has ceased. When one has attained the fourth trance, inbreathing and outbreathing have ceased… Both perception and feeling have ceased when one has attained the cessation of perception and feeling. (SN 36.11; tr. PTS vol IV p 146) The activities are the habitual or volitive actions of speech, body, and mind. The cessation of inbreathing and outbreathing does not mean that breathing in and breathing out have ceased, only that habit and volition in inbreathing and outbreathing have ceased. Likewise, the cessation of perception and feeling is only the cessation of habit and volition in perception and feeling. Gautama defined concentration in terms of "one-pointedness of mind": And what… is the (noble) right concentration with the causal associations, with the accompaniments? It is right view, right purpose, right speech, right action, right mode of livelihood, right endeavor, right mindfulness. Whatever one-pointedness of mind is accompanied by these seven components, this… is called the (noble) right concentration with the causal associations and the accompaniments.” (MN III 117 tr. PTS vol III p 114; “noble” substituted for Ariyan; emphasis added) This is where Vipassana teachers and some Theravadin teachers will differ from Ch'an and Zen teachers. I'm writing about that now, and I hope you will excuse my inclusion of a lengthy quote from my work-in-progress: The difficulty is that “one-pointedness of mind” has been taken by different people in the Buddhist community to mean different things. One modern Theravadin teacher, for example, has disputed that the term could actually refer to the mind as a singular point, and instead posits that the reference is to a singular object of attention: A Pali sutta, MN 44, defines concentration as cittass’ek’aggatā, which is often translated as “one-pointedness of mind”: cittassa = “of the mind” or “of the heart,” eka = one, agga = point, -tā = -ness. MN 117 defines noble right concentration as any one-pointedness of mind supported by the first seven factors of the noble path, from right view through right mindfulness. MN 43 states further that one-pointedness is a factor of the first jhāna, the beginning level of right concentration. From these passages, it has been argued that if one’s awareness in concentration or jhāna is truly one-pointed, it should be no larger than a point, which means that it would be incapable of thinking, of hearing sounds, or even of being aware of the physical body. However, this interpretation imposes too narrow a meaning on the word ek’aggatā, one that is foreign to the linguistic usage of the Pali Canon. … (the teacher concludes: ) Show your lack of contempt for your meditation object by giving it your full attention and mastering concentration… Gather the mind around its one object. (https://www.dhammatalks.org/Archive/Writings/CrossIndexed/Uncollected/MiscEssays/OnePointed160822.pdf, Thanissaro Bhikkyu; parenthetical added) In my experience, “one-pointedness” has more to do with the self as a singular entity than with single-minded attention to a meditation object. A teacher in modern India, Nisargadatta, described the self as “the consciousness in the body”: You are not your body, but you are the consciousness in the body, because of which you have the awareness of “I am”. It is without words, just pure beingness. (Gaitonde, Mohan [2017]. Self – Love: The Original Dream [Shri Nisargadatta Maharaj’s Direct Pointers to Reality]) For most people, the consciousness associated with “I am” is at one single location at any given moment. Nisargadatta went on to say: Meditation means you have to hold consciousness by itself. The consciousness should give attention to itself. (ibid) Zen teacher Koan Franz talked about the difference between attention to a meditation object, and attention to the base of consciousness, “the mind”: So (in zazen), have your hands… palms up, thumbs touching, and there’s this common instruction: place your mind here. Different people interpret this differently. Some people will say this means to place your attention here, meaning to keep your attention on your hands. It’s a way of turning the lens to where you are in space so that you’re not looking out here and out here and out here. It’s the positive version, perhaps, of ‘navel gazing’. The other way to understand this is to literally place your mind where your hands are–to relocate mind (let’s not say your mind) to your center of gravity, so that mind is operating from a place other than your brain. Some traditions take this very seriously, this idea of moving your consciousness around the body. I wouldn’t recommend dedicating your life to it, but as an experiment, I recommend trying it, sitting in this posture and trying to feel what it’s like to let your mind, to let the base of your consciousness, move away from your head. One thing you’ll find, or that I have found, at least, is that you can’t will it to happen, because you’re willing it from your head. To the extent that you can do it, it’s an act of letting go–and a fascinating one. (“No Struggle [Zazen Yojinki, Part 6]”, by Koun Franz, from the “Nyoho Zen” site; https://nyoho.com/2018/09/15/no-struggle-zazen-yojinki-part-6/) Franz suggested that “the base of consciousness” can move to a location in the body outside the head, through “an act of letting go”. Gautama also spoke about letting go, more specifically about “self-surrender”: … making self-surrender the object of thought, (a person) lays hold of concentration, lays hold of one-pointedness. (SN 48.10, tr. PTS vol. V p 174) Shunryu Suzuki, founding teacher of the San Francisco Zen Center, spoke about the mind moving in zazen: Sometimes when you think that you are doing zazen with an imperturbable mind, you ignore the body, but it is also necessary to have the opposite understanding at the same time. Your body is practicing zazen in imperturbability while your mind is moving. (“Whole-Body Zazen”, lecture by Shunryu Suzuki at Tassajara, June 28, 1970; edited by Bill Redican) Franz described “an act of letting go” to allow “the base of consciousness” to move away from the head. Gautama spoke of “making self-surrender the object of thought” in order to lay hold of “one-pointedness”. Suzuki spoke of the body practicing in imperturbability while the mind is moving. My advice would be to look for consciousness to move away from the head in the moments before falling asleep, then allow for that same freedom of movement in seated meditation. Here's my summary of the actionable elements of the mindfulness described in Anapanasati: 1) Relax the activity of the body in inhalation and exhalation; 2) Find a feeling of ease and calm the senses connected with balance, in inhalation and exhalation; 3) Appreciate and detach from thought, in inhalation and exhalation; 4) Look to the free location of consciousness for the automatic activity of inhalation and exhalation. (Applying the Pali Instructions) In my experience, once all of the elements above come into awareness, they tend to interchange in a natural way. I sit down first thing in the morning and last thing at night, and I look to experience the activity of the body solely by virtue of the free location of consciousness. As a matter of daily life, just to touch on such experience as occasion demands—for me, that’s enough. (Take the Backward Step)

Magnetism guide us to da nort' pole, man it cold pink camellias

Sorry to hear that about Anapanasati. How do you interpret the fifteenth element, the third in the mindfulness of states of mind (the states of mind being the last of the four arisings of mindfulness)?

From a piece I'm currently writing: Gautama would generally describe a set of four "corporeal" concentrations, and then describe the set of five "incorporeal" concentrations. “Corporeal” is defined in the Oxford dictionary as “relating to a person's body”. The four corporeal concentrations concern the body in that they culminate in a cessation of habit and volition in the activity of the body. In particular, they culminate in a cessation of habit and volition in the activity of inhalation and exhalation. About the five “incorporeal" concentrations, Gautama said very little. My understanding is that they have to do with the experience of things that are beyond the range of the senses. According to Gautama, the “incorporeal” concentrations culminate in a cessation of habit and volition in the activity of the mind, in particular a cessation of habit and volition in the activity of feeling and perceiving. The cessation of habit and volition in speech, deed, and mind, is not the cessation of speech, deed, and thought. I think it does match the description "wu-wei", however--doing nothing yet everything is done. I've spent my life since age 25 attempting to reconcile the experience of action of the body without habit or volition with the demands of everyday life for the exercise of habit and volition. That would seem to be the issue you are addressing, in your conclusion about the interpretation of wu-wei. What I discover is that the mindfulness that Gautama referred to as his way of living only requires a return to the cessation of habit and volition in the activity of the body, as appropriate: Gautama often referred to the four “corporeal” concentrations, together with an overview of the body taken after the fourth, as “the five limbs” of concentration. My guess is that he generally practiced “the five limbs”, and only occasionally took up the "incorporeal" concentrations. I believe the practice of the five limbs was a necessary part of the mindfulness that was Gautama’s way of living. Gautama described his way of living as a mindfulness of the body, the feelings, the mind, and the mental states, a mindfulness set up through sixteen contemplations, each made with an awareness of breathing in or breathing out (SN 54.12; PTS vol. V p 289). Among the sixteen was the contemplation of “cessation”: Contemplating cessation I shall breathe in. Contemplating cessation I shall breathe out. (SN 54.1; Pali Text Society vol. V p 275-276) The contemplation of “cessation” while breathing in and while breathing out is particularly conducive to the cessation of habit and volition in inhalation and exhalation, particularly if there has been a recent experience of “the five limbs”. I have summarized the actionable elements of Gautama’s mindfulness: 1) Relax the activity of the body in inhalation and exhalation; 2) Find a feeling of ease and calm the senses connected with balance, in inhalation and exhalation; 3) Appreciate and detach from thought, in inhalation and exhalation; 4) Look to the free location of consciousness for the automatic activity of inhalation and exhalation. In my experience, once the elements above are brought into awareness, they tend to interchange in a natural way. Gautama declared the mindfulness set up through the sixteen elements to be the “best of ways”, and his usual way of living in the rainy season (SN 54.11; PTS vol. V p 289; see also MN 118). Hopefully I will post the complete piece on my site soon. The reconciliation of "wu-wei" with everyday life requires only being able to "wu-wei" with regard to the activity of the body in the appropriate moment, and for most purposes that can be set up in regular seated meditation. Nevertheless, the result is as Shunryu Suzuki said: So, when you practice zazen, your mind should be concentrated in your breathing and this kind of activity is the fundamental activity of the universal being. If so, how you should use your mind is quite clear. Without this experience, or this practice, it is impossible to attain the absolute freedom. (“Thursday Morning Lectures”, November 4th 1965, Los Altos; emphasis added)

it makes the dance more that they run on the water together as one (photo by David Krinke)

Hope you don't mind my asking, but why Vipassana in particular?

In physical terms, activity of the body solely by virtue of the location of consciousness is regulated by the stretch of ligaments and fascia. Ligaments in particular stretch and resile, especially waking and sleeping, and each day the relationship of freedom in the location of consciousness to the stretch of ligaments and the activity of the body changes. I've written about the fourth jhana: Things can shift from activity of the body coordinated by the free placement of consciousness, to activity that takes place solely by virtue of the free location of consciousness. Here’s Gautama’s description of the fourth concentration: Again, a (person), putting away ease… enters and abides in the fourth musing; seated, (one) suffuses (one’s) body with purity by the pureness of (one’s) mind so that there is not one particle of the body that is not pervaded with purity by the pureness of (one’s) mind. … just as a (person) might sit with (their) head swathed in a clean cloth; even so (one) sits suffusing (their) body with purity… (AN III Book of Fives, The Fivefold, The Five-Limbed, Pali Text Society vol. III p 18-19) ... In some sermons, Gautama offered a variation on his metaphor for the fourth concentration: … it is as if (a person) might be sitting down who had clothed (themselves) including (their) head with a white cloth; there would be no part of (their) whole body that was not covered by the white cloth. (MN III 119 Pali Text Society vol. III p 134) In the fourth concentration, ease in the nerve exits between vertebrae along the sacrum and spine provides an ability to feel right to the surface of the skin all over the body, such that “there is not one particle of the body” that cannot receive the placement of consciousness. (Applying the Pali Instructions) With regard to the description of the fourth concentration: Gautama made clear through his choice of words (“not one particle… that is not pervaded”) that the mind can remain one-pointed, even as the body is suffused with “purity by the pureness of mind”. An evenness in the nerve exits between vertebrae along the sacrum and spine is effected by a freedom of location in the one-pointed consciousness identified with the self in the body. The prior three jhanas involve particular patterns of coordination between the location of consciousness and stretch and resile in the ligaments of the pelvis, sacrum, and spine, patterns of coordination that effect the stretch and resile of ligaments necessary to open the related nerve exits and realize feeling throughout the body.

I try! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzYWTIHqutA

Those be turkeys, just like the Bums.

My feeling is that the jhanas are natural states of concentration, inherent in the experience of consciousness, body, and mind, and they are manifested as habit and volition fall away. 2 ¢, there.

They're very public, as Gautama had "no closed fist of the teacher": What more does the community of bhikkhus expect from me, Ananda? I have set forth the Dhamma without making any distinction of esoteric and exoteric doctrine; there is nothing, Ananda, with regard to the teachings that the Tathagata holds to the last with the closed fist of a teacher who keeps some things back. (Maha-parinibbana Sutta, Part Two: The Journey to Vesali 32, tr. Sister Vajira & Francis Story) Regarding the energetic body--can't say as I'm familiar with it, but I do find that the singularity of consciousness has an ease, if I can get some of the other components of mindfulness working as well--to wit: 1) Relax the activity of the body in inhalation and exhalation; 2) Find a feeling of ease and calm the senses connected with balance, in inhalation and exhalation; 3) Appreciate and detach from thought, in inhalation and exhalation; 4) Look to the free location of consciousness for the automatic activity of inhalation and exhalation. Those being what are to me the actionable elements of the mindfulness Gautama referred to as his own.

Dwai, thank you so much for your interest. Take a gander at Applying the Pali Instructions, if you would (the "someone" in that first paragraph is Stirling!). Let me know what you think.

Back at you. The jhanas are particular experiences, of consciousness and the mind and body, based around experience of the singularity of the consciousness identified with the self (the one associated with the thought, "I am"). Not the permanency or reality of the notion of self, nor the permanency or reality of the "I" in "I am", but the experience of the singularity of that consciousness. A person can "see by means of wisdom", yet not have destroyed the cankers (asavas) completely. A person can practice all the jhanas, yet not have destroyed the cankers complelely. And which, monks, is the person who is freed both ways? As to this, monks, some person is abiding, having apprehended with the person those peaceful Deliverances which are incorporeal having transcended material shapes; and having seen by means of wisdom his cankers are utterly destroyed. I, monks, do not say of this (person) that there is something to be done through diligence. What is the reason for this? It has been done by (them) through diligence, (they) could not become negligent. And which, monks, is the person who is freed by means of intuitive wisdom? As to this, monks, some person is abiding without having apprehended with the person those peaceful Deliverances which are incorporeal having transcended material shapes; yet, having seen by means of wisdom (their) cankers are utterly destroyed. This, monks, is called the person who is freed by means of intuitive wisdom. I, monks, do not say of this (person) that there is something to be done through diligence. What is the reason for this? It has been done by (them) through diligence, (they) could not become negligent. And which, monks, is the person who is a mental-realiser? As to this, monks, some person is abiding, having apprehended with the person those peaceful Deliverances which are incorporeal having transcended material shapes; and having seen by means of wisdom some (only) of his cankers are utterly destroyed.... This, monks, is called the person who is a mental-realiser. I, monks, say of this monk that there is something to be done through diligence.... And which, monks, is the person that has won to view? As to this, monks, some person is abiding without having apprehended with the person those peaceful Deliverances which are having transcended material shapes; yet having seen by means of wisdom some of his cankers are utterly destroyed, and those things that are proclaimed by the Tathagatha are fully seen by him through intuitive wisdom and fully practiced.... This, monks, is called the person who has won to view. I, monks, say of this monk that there is something to be done through diligence.... And which, monks, is the person who is freed by faith? As to this, monks, some person is abiding without having apprehended with the person those peaceful Deliverances which are having transcended material shapes; and having seen by means of wisdom some of his cankers are utterly destroyed, and his faith in the Tathagatha is settled, genuine, established. This, monks, is called the person who is freed by faith. I, monks, say of this monk that there is something to be done through diligence.... And which, monks, is the person who is striving for dhamma? As to this, monks, some person is abiding without having apprehended with the person those peaceful Deliverances which are having transcended material shapes; but although he has seen by means of wisdom his cankers are not (yet) utterly destroyed; and those things proclaimed by the Tathagatha are (only) moderately approved of by him by means of intuitive wisdom, although he has these states, namely the faculty of faith, the faculty of energy, the faculty of mindfulness, the faculty of concentration, the faculty of wisdom. This, monks, is called the person who is striving for dhamma. I, monks, say of this monk that there is something to be done through diligence.... And which, monks, is the person who is striving for faith? As to this, monks, some person is abiding without having apprehended with the person those peaceful Deliverances which are having transcended material shapes; yet, having seen by means of wisdom his cankers are not utterly destroyed; but if he has enough faith in the Tathagatha, enough regard, then he will have these things, that is to say, the faculty of faith, the faculty of energy, the faculty of mindfulness, the faculty of concentration, the faculty of wisdom. This, monks, is called the person who is striving after faith. I, monks, say of this monk that there is something to be done through diligence.... MN 70 (Kitagirisutta, PTS 478-480 pp 151-154) Nevertheless, the paths of the learner and of the adept include right concentration, and right concentration is "one-pointedness of mind": And what… is the (noble) right concentration with the causal associations, with the accompaniments? It is right view, right purpose, right speech, right action, right mode of livelihood, right endeavor, right mindfulness. Whatever one-pointedness of mind is accompanied by these seven components, this… is called the (noble) right concentration with the causal associations and the accompaniments.” (MN III 117 © Pali Text Society vol III p 114; “noble” substituted for Ariyan; emphasis added) Herein… the (noble) disciple, making self-surrender the object of (their) thought, lays hold of concentration, lays hold of one-pointedness. (The disciple), aloof from sensuality, aloof from evil conditions, enters on the first trance, which is accompanied by thought directed and sustained, which is born of solitude, easeful and zestful, and abides therein. (SN 48.10, Pali Text Society vol. V p 174) … just as a handy bathman or attendant might strew bath-powder in some copper basin and, gradually sprinkling water, knead it together so that the bath-ball gathered up the moisture, became enveloped in moisture and saturated both in and out, but did not ooze moisture; even so, (a person) steeps, drenches, fills, and suffuses this body with zest and ease, born of solitude, so that there is not one particle of the body that is not pervaded by this lone-born zest and ease. (Pali Text Society AN vol. III p 18-19; see also MN 119 Pali Text Society vol. III p 132-134)

that's a two-way street, you know. Can't learn unless you teach, can't teach unless you learn. I am teaching myself, when I can stand to listen to myself.