Non

WEll as much as possible but I haven't set aside a practice. I just do it within my qigong practice, like the 5 tibetans that I haven't done in a while, and other qigongs. I used to do Pranic Breathing, and also the Cleansing Breath from Anthony Robbins. Really should get back into it though. When I do sitting or standing meditation I do it.

it seems this is the correct link: http://montalk.net/notes/law-of-attraction-vs-law-of-awareness

see.. and I would say, that's just submission. that's just settling with what you've got and not hoping for more. but sometimes it feels that's all I can do...

so what am I supposed to do, just accept this will be my life forever until I die, and be happy with it?

both within and without but then why the overemphasis of the "within"? Only because we are more focused on the without?

http://www.thetaobums.com/index.php?/topic/18113-law-of-attraction-do-you-attract-or-create/ just seems relevant I dont know.

Good post.

I think also one should breathe not just from the abdomen but also the pelvic cavity. Both together, perhaps symbolizing a union between the spleen source of postnatal qi and kidneys the source of pre natal qi.

If that's the case then those relationships ARE being harmonious with your life, and your choices.

Also Gabriel Cousens writes about this in Spiritual Nutrition, and the books about the Rainbow Diet. Rainbow Greens LiVefood Cuisine and Consious Eating also talk about this. He's a diplomat in Ayurveda as well and uses the principles thereof to develop a low/moderate glycemic live food diet.

Well whatever, what I generally mean is that I want a harmonious relationship. I just would think those who are into that kind of stuff are going to be the ones who have the greater ability to have harmonious relationships with someone.

I would actually get with a spiritual chick. But then again I'm more interested in karezza than to have "hot one night stand-ish quantitative fertility driven sex with many different female potentials whilst also diminishing the competition self esteem and ability of other males to succeed."

I will read it, but I just find it totally cruel of women to judge men who have good intentions and being totally unhelpful, and betraying. In fact that website might actually be pretty good, because it's not in the form of "PUA" material, but actually self defense and such.

I had a dream the other day.. the TCM school I go to was being "protected" by big psycho gorillas or apes that looked like huge beastly tigers when viewed from the top, protecting the corruption of the school. I ended up outsmarting them and getting rid of them and "saving" the school. What do you think it means?

actually being alpha to women is just "being the best". It's totally diminishing to humanity. Why judge and seperate men into two categories as "best" and "second best/last". Not everyone can be the leader, if there even has to be a leader. But just because the person is a leader doesn't make him always "the best" mate. It would be totally unequal for example the president of the US to get all the women in the US while his inferiors get none, all because of his position. And it's just that, his position. He can be replaced. A person can learn to replace him. It doesn't make him worse because he hasn't learned (yet) so far.

SO how can one then prepare for these divine powers if you're not taking measures to make one a better conduit for these divine powers? Or we'l have to wait for the end of the freaking UNiverse for it to FORCE us on the "right path" by then it may be totally destructive.

OK,well this forum is about Taoist concepts like yin and yang. I want to learn about yin and yang. OK maybe I'm looking for this knowledge too much from without but sometimes you gotta start somewhere.

Yes, well.. what I mean is that it should have some purpose. I don't think sxual energy should be used without purpose, that would just make it a waste.

Yes, well.. what I mean is that it should have some purpose. I don't think sxual energy should be used without purpose, that would just make it a waste. Making it focused on the ego self, is IMO more what I was referring to as "focusing on yourself" rather than the non-egoic all is one type of "self".

I think grapefruit is alright because it's low glycemic. Just not the apple juice.

is there a no sugar version of this flush that does not require apple juice or any kind of juice.

Exactly.. I was just thinking about how it could even BE 7000 yrs old. In my Chinese History class we only went back 3,000 yrs old. Well maybe more but when history started to be recorded starting with the Yellow Emperor that's 3,000 yrs ago. 7,000 yrs ago is crazy, like caveman days. I din't even know Buddhism and Taoism existed then. I think what they mean is thatit has it's roots in the ancient 7,000 yr old shamanic and more primitive traditions which have been passed down and then took on the influences of buddhism and taoism.

I just don't know how one can masturbate to onself. Asking a person to instead of masturbating to porn and masturbating to one self is still pretty much the same thing only you're focusing the energy which should be expressed and manifested with others and turning it on yourself and ONLY yourself. It's still auto-eroticism. This energy must be shared. Sure yes, it includes yourself but if it were to be shared in only a fantasy with yourself and not for example a goal that is shared with the outside world, than you're just masturbating to yourself.

I just do not understand how one can masturbate to oneself. It's kind of homosexual, it's not a turn on whatsoever. Besides, then you'll start to lose interest in the opposite sex. So what then?

just want to know if anyone here has tried it and can tell me if it's really good or not.