Simple_Jack

Jews are considered Gods chosen children, please disprove this.

The Vedas and Upanishads are shruti i.e. uncreated and eternal, ralis please disprove this.

What I see here are statements in regards to beings from divine realms commanding adherence to absolute rules for teaching/transmission. Can that be proven, or is the belief in such, blind faith? Can a rational discourse such as what Kabbalists insist on prove the existence of a divine realm that Kabbalists defer to without question? Are the so called divine realms pure myth? These are reasonable questions.

Yes, although I think that having said that there's a a huge difference between those who label themselves as Vedantins and de facto Vedantins - who aren't reliant on double standards.

I wasn't specifically mentioning Buddhism when I indicated that Dharmic religions consider it unnecessary to posit a creator god in order to understand the nature of afflictions. The Vedas and Upanishads are shruti i.e. uncreated and eternal.

You'd probably end up becoming a "Direct Path Advaita" devotee.

Neither has anyone been able to debunk my statement, indicating that Dharmic religions, consider positing a creator god as unnecessary to understanding the nature of afflictions.

I've noticed a lot of biased behavior and double standards by gatito, ralis, etc.

Bump.

I thought this thread would've been pitted by now.

Bump.

As of yet, no one has been able to debunk the point I made about Dharmic religions, considering it unnecessary to posit a creator god in order to understand the nature of afflictions. E-prime as a legitimate basis for criticism = paradoxical reasoning.

As expected this discussion is full of logical fallacies and double standards.

Yes, prejudice which can only be directed towards Buddhism despite the claims of the Vedas, the Torah, the Bible, the Koran being of divine origin.

Bump.

I hope you admit to your logical fallacies and double standards by then.

Some of the other posters weren't being nice when I pointed out that it wasn't pertinent for Dharmic religions to posit a creator god in order to understand the nature of afflictions.

I wasn't the one who specifically mentioned Buddhism, when I pointed out that all Dharmic religions, do not consider positing a creator god as pertinent to understanding the nature of afflictions.

I'll man up when you, gatito, etc. end the logical fallacies and admit to your double standards.

Because they are proving that you, ralis, etc. are biased and defer to double standards.

No, only that the criticism of Buddhism from you, gatito, etc are double standards.

Then this should also apply to Buddhism.

Which should also apply to the Vedas, the Torah, the Bible, the Koran.

This applies to the principles of Buddhism how?

You should admit that Vedanta is also faith-based like the Torah, the Bible, the Koran.