Simple_Jack

Another double standard.

Vedanta is based off of the Vedas and the Upanishads which are considered of divine origin.

Yes, so are believing the Vedas, the Torah, the Bible, the Koran are of divine origin.

Ralis dug himself into a hole when he tried to judge Buddhism on the basis of e-prime.

Him, ralis & Co. know double standards.

Another double standard because I posted a summary on how to put the buddhadharma to practice, here http://thetaobums.com/topic/32739-yidams-in-vajrayana/?p=500344

A double standard because according to him this only applies to Vedanta.

Funny you're only applying this to Vedanta which further proves my point that you, ralis, etc. are reliant on double standards.

Double standard.

Which proves my point that you, ralis, etc. are reliant on double standards.

Which should apply to Vedanta and the Abrahamic religions as well.

You didn't understand the point which I brought up because you are not a practitioner of buddhadharma.

Which should also apply towards Vedanta and the Abrahamic religions.

Yes, just like the Abrahamic religions, which I have yet to see any directed bias on these boards.

Which I contrasted with this http://thetaobums.com/topic/32739-yidams-in-vajrayana/?p=500463

Is this being applied to to the Vedas and Abrahamic religions, also? Because they also claim the same thing.

Exactly.

No, I contrasted this http://thetaobums.com/topic/32739-yidams-in-vajrayana/?p=500270, with this http://thetaobums.com/topic/32739-yidams-in-vajrayana/?p=500323

Bump.

I know, but that does prove that you were proselytizing.

You didn't challenge anything except by the standards of e-prime.

http://thetaobums.com/topic/32739-yidams-in-vajrayana/?p=500405

Yes, you are inherently biased like Brian.

Does this apply to you when you try to propagate NeoAdvaita on the Buddhist sub-forum?

~~~~~Ad Hominems & Personal Insults ~~~~~ ~~~~~Ad Hominems & Personal Insults ~~~~~