Immortal4life

The Mysterious Origins of Man This award-winning documentary hosted by Charlton Heston first aired on primetime NBC in 1996. Almost 30 million viewers tuned in the first time it was broadcast despite strong competition from other networks on the same night. It discusses many so called "out of place" artifacts or finds, that go against conventional notions about the past- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Po3fu-lCTdQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1XNdpp0PsM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxXOM2yhz-0 or another version- YouTube - Charlton Heston on the Origin of Man Part 1 YouTube - Chalrton Heston on the Origin of Man Part 2 YouTube - Charlton Heston on the Origin of Man Part 3 YouTube - Charlton Heston on the Origins of Man Part 5 YouTube - Charlton Heston on the Origins of Man Part 5 YouTube - Charlton Heston on the Origins of Man Part 6 Atlantis Or the entire documentary in one part- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvRBfMH1GBg Haha!- Mysterious Origins of Man learn more about it- Home Page

One aspect of the Theory of Evolution that many people forget about, is the teaching that men are superior to women. For over 50 years scientists held on to the theory that Man was a ''Mighty Hunter'', a great ape which came down from the trees, saw the Savannah with all these animals running around, picked up a weapon, and started chasing and killing them all. Competition for mates, killing of animals for food, competition for power, as well as combat and war caused the so-called ''natural selection'' to have a much greater effect on males than females. Men evolved much faster and much greater than women. Some Evolutionists even classify Men and Women as 2 distinct evolutionary species, males as homo frontalis, and females as homo parietalis. The true purpose for the fabrication of evolutionary theory becomes quite clear. Man can now be said to be a ''Mighty Hunter'', a killer, and a weapon wielder while women are now parasites, sexual objects, and symbols of status that men compete for. Unfortunately for evolutionists, the idea of apes evolving into humans by becoming hunters who ran around on the Savannah was completely debunked by the 1990s, and even evolutionists have to admit it is not true. Evolutionists no longer have any explanation for what happened when apes took the alleged first steps to evolving into human beings, or how that possibly happened. Evolutionists were so quick to claim the Australapithicus Apes or ''Lucy'', to be a human relative, and some even claimed it was an ancestor of humans. It ended up biting them in the ass when it came out that ''Lucy'' lived in the trees, and was not a hunter. In fact, as it turns out, Lucy was prey and was hunted by Lions, Tigers, and Sabretooths. Here is part of a documentary explaining how the theory of evolution is designed to slander the intelligence and equality of women- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE1GEs6kub8 More, Desmond Moore on why the Savannah theory, or the ''Man the Mighty Hunter'' myth, is completely dead- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFRYtPQfyCk The History of Evolution's Teaching of Women's Inferiority- http://www.rae.org/women.html The history of the teaching of human female inferiority in Darwinism- http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v14/i1/females.asp

Lol, "don't watch this film!" Well, now I am just going to have to watch it!

What you don't realize is that this is not a pro-religious argument. Yes many religions believe women to be second class citizens, but if evolution were true, the implications would also be that women are inferior. But you know what the weakest argument of all is? Saying "well, religions are a form of sexism too!"

Comparative Mythology Documentary explaining how many beliefs modern people have, and so called scientific theories, are more like Fairy Tales for grown ups- Evolution: Fact or Belief ? High level beings (Yawheh in the west, Nu Wa in the east) created themselves and human DNA in the realm of molecules, at that vibrational level, molecular level. They viewed molecules as Clay in China ( or in Lemuria?) and as dust in the West (Atlantis). This is how it was explained to people in the past who did not know what a molecule was, but did know what clay and dust were- It's no surprise because the modern DNA diagrams of today correspond to the anciet pre-natal and pre-heaven I Ching construct. Pre-natal energy is the energy inherited from your parents, whereas the energy of air, water, food etc. is classified as post-natal energy. 5000 years ago the ancients wrote that the pre-natal energy at the microcosmic level inside the body, was constructed in the formation we now know to be DNA. They wrote that what it actually looked like from that level was that inside the human body at the microcosmic level, was like the universe outside the earth and that the human body was a small universe. Prenatal qi, and pre-heaven I Ching arrangement http://www.greatdreams.com/sacred/i-ching.JPG Post-natal, and post-heaven I Ching arrangement http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/loshu64.gif DNA and prenatal qi are the same thing or closely related- The I Ching and the Genetic Code I Ching Genetic Code HyperDiamond Physics DNA was known for thousands of years- ~-_ Planet Art Network _-~ Hermes in the west also knew of the same principles Caduceus vs Staff of Asclepius Adam and Eve An explanation of exactly how humans evolved and were created. Actually "Adam's" full name was Amilleus in Atlantis Edgar Cayce on human origins Mysterious Places: Atlantis (Morgana's Observatory) http://www.edgarcayce.org/am/geneticevidence.html Cosmic 'DNA': Double Helix Spotted in Space http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060315_dna_nebula .html The way the universe works is by microcosms/macrocosms, inter-generation/inter-inhibition. What happens in one dimension affects other dimensions Scientific principles of God Chapter Nineteen The Children of the Law of One Basic Meta-Physics of Science-Magic - Page 17 more explanation from an historical perspective- The Official Graham Hancock Website

You have to seek out information , do real research. Research that is beyond just google. Certainly the Mayans were wise, some people believe their Calendar was more accurate than ours today.

Obviously if the body was a different size, the heart and ciculatory system would also be different and proportionate to the larger body.

That site has a lot of information on it to go through.

The term Uni-verse implies there is only one. To ask which one, suggests subscribing to a different theory, the Multi-verse theory.

That's an intriguing and exciting thought

I just call it extremely far, because there would be many steps invovled to go from Extra Terrestrials visiting earth, to influencing man, to actually coming here to appear as men. I have not said anything about the validity of that theory, only that in how I view it, that is taking the Extra terrestrial theory even one step farther. In my mind, I hadn't gone that far with it yet.....

You can call it whatever you want, but "Taoist" Tai Chi, in this context, is still a misnomer. It is widely known that pretty much any instructor of any legitimate style will tell you to stay away from the Taoist Tai chi Society. I don't need experience in the style, I have seen it. I have seen instructors in knee braces while practicing in the park. If you understand a little bit about how the body works, it is not hard to see that this form can and will cause problems. I know of several people who quit shortly after starting, and got the impression that Tai chi wasn't that great of an art. There is a reason it is not popular in China, and is only popular in the west, where many people don't know a lot about Tai chi, or what good Tai Chi is.

The book of Enoch is a very interesting subject, and something to look into further in the future for sure.

You seem very biased towards and stuck on this one piece of evidence. Perhaps you can explain what you thought was the relevant point in the video?

There's no such thing as "Taoist" Tai Chi. Many legitimate teachers of traditonal schools have stated this style of Tai Chi is a fruad. The founder of Taoist Tai Chi came to Canada, started claiming to be a Tai Chi teacher, and many of his students got back and knee problems. More here- http://web.archive.org/web/20080330150404/http://www.taichicanada.com/page5/page5.html

Jesus and Buddha as Aliens? Now that is taking the theory extremely far....

There is no doubt that the earth went through catasrophic changes, and sea levels rose by a lot, at the end of the last ice age. The experts who have studied Yonaguni in depth, including Dr. Kimura, have stated it is definitely shaped by humans. They have even found tool marks and inscriptions on it. It is proven that climate change today, it influenced greatly by CO2 emissions, this is not in dispute. In fact they can chart exactlty how much man is contributing to it. Look up the Hockey stick graph, or an Inconvenient Truth.

Andre the Giant was a great man, with a lot of personality and charisma. No he didn't live long, but is that the ultimate test of a person's life? How long they live? If the only mention of evidence of Giant beings was from the Bible I would not think it was that interesting of a subject, however, it is not the only source.

How substantive it is, is somewhat a matter of opinion and depends on what standards you judge by. I am not going to say it is 100% for sure proven, but I also cannot say it is 100% a lie used to decieve people. The reason that find is worth considering, is because it is in line with, and can potentially corroborate other evidence or accounts of Giants.

Yes I include this case and report, as a part of, and as a supplement to, a larger body of evidence, finds, artifacts, accounts, corroborative myths, etc. talking about the existence of Giants or people who lived extraordinarily long lives.

Well that's an......extreme....position.....

Article about reports of the remains of Giants being found- http://hubpages.com/hub/Human-Giants More on the giant thigh bone- Story Behind the Giant Human Femur Sculpture- http://mtblanco.com/TourGiantArticle.htm

That is an interesting perspective, which definitely has some truth. Often we are what we believe we are.

I think you are confusing the Discovery Channel for the Discovery Institute. This is the Discovery Channel, the television channel that the Documentary in the OP comes from- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqV3clvlC4Q