Immortal4life

What happened when all that snow melted? This should shed some light on the mystery-

Over 500 cultures worldwide have accounts of a major flood or worldwide Earth changes.

Since you mentioned him, I looked him up, here are some lectures- http://gnosticteachings.org/the-teachings-of-gnosis/lectures-by-samael-aun-weor/

It is probably true that such practices are a double edged sword, and if done improperly can cause problems

I think one of the underlying principles behind a truly spiritual perspective and view of the universe is the understanding that there has to be purpose and meaning behind it. Here is a cool article written by World-class Molecular Biologist Dr. Sermonti about how a materialist dogma that states that the universe and existence is all a meaningless occurrence, a chance accident, and with no purpose has infiltrated and held back science- Is There a Purpose in Nature? - Giuseppe Sermonti also-

On Google video as well- http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-250123575095449181#

Vortex has it exactly right. Said it better than I did.

I do. I definitely see more expansion into ideas about aliens and advanced knowledge. Viewing ancient accounts from a technological viewpoint, from the viewpoint and interpretation of potential ancient technology, will be more and more popular. Also, I see the philosophies and ideas of all the world's religions coming together, being integrated, more and more.

lol!

Indeed, no you won't.

What exactly are the techniques you use?

I don't know why, but Darwinists always seem to attack anything that is different or outside their philosophy, including this program it seems. Here are some comments and responses to the documentary. It is so obvious the evolutionists were desperate to make any excuse they could to attack it, and they keep making more and more elaborate arguments, no matter how contrived. Just grasping at straws. Anytime a film gets peoples' panties in a bunch to this extent, you know it is good, and that it has substance to it. Lmao! We can see comments from open minded and well informed people who found the documentary quite interesting, and we can also see the hilarious comments made by hardcore fundamentalist evolution supporters

MOM is always popular and draws good numbers. I could never finish the whole 10 Commandments movie when there are other channels on tv.

Well, I looked into what this exactly is....and it's actually a fascinating topic. Definitely something to research more in the future.

More on the Olmecs here- http://www.grahamhancock.com/gallery/mexico/default.htm

Whatever your beliefs or opinions about what I may or may not be are, they do not change the fact that Evolution is an idea thought up by males, with male biases, attempting to make sexism into a scientific fact.

When I think Of Charlton Heston my first thought is Taylor, from Planet of the Apes. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKdSXfPl8vY

That is quite interesting. I hadn't thought about that. Some people believe the Freemasons are quite old, going back at least to the time of Solomon's Temple.

Apparently they don't only represent a beginning, but a new beginning, a new cycle- http://www.templestudy.com/2008/09/17/nuwa-and-fuxi-in-chinese-mythology-compass-square/ Considered the survivors of a major flood- http://taoism.about.com/b/2008/09/03/nuwa-fuxi.htm There are over 500 Flood stories in ancient cultures worldwide. In the case of Fu Xi and Nu Kua, they retreated to the Kunlun Mountains- http://powerpointparadise.com/blog/2011/02/chinese-mythology-clarified-by-miao-legend-genesis-hebrew-history/

The Disasters Darwinism brought to Humanity So there has been some confusion as to what darwinism is. Is it a belief? A philosophy? a science? a worldview? It is a worldview from the 1800s. In it's principles and ideology, it reflects the opinions of Darwin himself, and even the societal views of the people of the time! If a theory is correct, it will not reflect the beliefs of a culture. It will not be influenced by cultural opinions, or personal human opinion. It will be purely neutral and unaffected by human thinking or cultural beliefs. Yet Darwinism clearly reflects the culture and time period it came from Evolution is a concept from a time and place where people would be out and out racists . Many people today reject evolution on moral grounds. If evolution is true, clearly some of us must have evolved better than others, see? Video- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ok32-Xvo2tk Darwin's Deadly Legacy So it is for sure that belief in evolution and atheism on whole, causes bad results and overall lower morality. Encourages stealing, lying, selfishness, not caring about others, etc. But some people like this and want to promote this kind of thinking more and more. Darwinism itself is a tool to advance agendas and the type of thinking people had in the 1800s .The title of Darwin's book was "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life". Clearly it had a racial purpose, and held the idea that some people were better suited for survival than others, and it should be easy to see where that kind of thinking can lead. Here is a cool Documentary with many expert scientists, and famous authors and journalists showing where Darwinism leads. In the early 1900s, many European evolutionists went to Australia to catch Aboriginals. They had developed many instructions and methods on how to hunt, kill, and stuff aboriginals to be sent to museums and be presented as a type of ape, more primitive than white people. As a so-called missing link or transitionary form, between apes and human beings which they termed homo sapiens. In another part of the world, Africa, evolutionists were attempting to call humans a type of lower ape, with disastarous results. European evolutionists separated people in Africa, and then divided them up into 2 classifications of evolutionary species. They called them the Tutsi and Hutu. In fact some Tutsi are more genetically similar to some Hutu than they are to some other Tutsi. The fact that Pygmies had also lived in the area was also used by evolutionists to claim that Pygmies were a missing link between Apes and Hutu and Tutsi. In an era of Social Darwinism, European anthropologists claimed to identify a distinct “Hamitic race” that was superior to native “Negroid” populations. Influenced by racialized attitudes, European social scientists declared that the Tutsis, who wielded political control in Rwanda, must be descendents of the Hamites, who shared a purported closer blood line to Europeans. The Europeans “logically” concluded that the Tutsis and Hutus composed two fundamentally different ethno-racial groups. Thus, the European Darwinists viewed the Tutsis as more civilized, superior, but most importantly, more European than the Hutus. This arbitrary division culminated in war and the genocide in Rawanda. Clear proof of what happens when you make distinctions based on a false theory. It shows how Hitler referred to evolution frequently, and used the word Evolution, as well as the word Selection. In fact when the Nazis decided who would live and who would be executed, it was based on selection of who they thought was least "fit". Several decades later we see admirers of Hitler, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, apparently hardcore evolution supporters....the documentary quotes Klebold as writing that he thought "natural selection" was one of the greatest things ever to exist, the idea of killing and weeding out the weak was just. On the day of the Columbine massacre it is said that he wore a T-Shirt with the words "natural selection" on it. Also explained is that the evolutionist lobby are a bunch of hacks. If Einstein were alive today he would not be allowed to teach in schools because he used his theories and equations in what he believed was a search for God ultimately, and he was quoted as saying "God does not play dice". The evolutionist lobby of hacks like Eugenie Scott and Dawkins, for them to say "it's not real science if it mentions God" is a joke and preposterous. All the great scientists saw their work as a search to find God and as leading to God. We also have to remember that the progression of "transitionary fossils" all throughout the rock strata predicted by Darwin barely exists and much contradicts it, like the Cambrian explosion, even though some evolutionists still try to explain it away and make it fit the theory somehow through making excuses. Darwin's Deadly Legacy-

Now there is some solid logic that couldn't possibly have any holes in it! We know that non fundamentalist or non religious people never use ID sources.

Why do so many beings strive to survive, at almost all costs? Because Life and Energy is one of the fundamental characteristics of existence. Life always perseveres. Life always wants to unfold and reach it's potential. Life is always true to itself.

More on DNA-