三江源

Everything Shakti Mama said is spot on. Shakti Mama, I am kicking myself that you and Santi were just in London and I dodnt know and didnt get to come and play. BOOOO to my ( non) psychic powers for not telling me.

Ok Little1. If you ever want to share, I want to hear, ok?! lots of love. xxx

.

Are the 'levels' in the books? I have done what is in the woman's book, what I could do, as a solo practitioner. Level 3 is like Drew is describing - in the sense of people pointing their ass at you everywhere you go? Or something else?!

right, gotcha. that 'obsessive and needy freak' thing. run and run and run and run and run and run and run and run and run

Okey dokey. I guess if you get told your lip will sweat, it will.

Really? Blimey. It never entered my head.

.

you know why you cant be totally 'blunt' about your feelings, even if there is attraction? because being 'blunt' suggests a lack of finesse, a lack of sensitivity, a lack of a sense of the art of the slow reveal and of nuance.. so it is a bad sign. being 'direct' is not the same as being 'blunt'... and you CAN be totally 'direct' and it isnt a turn off.. but you cant do it too soon. because again it suggests a lack of sense of timing : a lack of finesse. and that suggests a lack of timing as a lover. and who wants a lover with a lousy sense of timing?! turn off again. idk if women dont know how they 'get seduced', but I do know that seeing ( ie. noticing )men strategise to get sex with you makes them comical, which is a turn off. Sex can be funny, but you should be laughing together, not at the blokes strategies. basically painting by numbers people need to be really good looking, or, like Mystery says, wear a big hat.

ah, thankyou. so in the USA you can get a used copy of it for about $2. " a must for sexual dullards" ! okaaaay! It does look interesting.. can it have anything in it that we dont know, is my first thought. sounds arrogant, doesnt it.. revealing to myself that I somehow assume that I have 'done' exploring sexual energy work, that I 'know' the extent of it. I wonder if that is possible. Is it a finite topic, do you think?

.

Little1, hi. I cant find the book that you are referring to.. do you have a link so I/we can find out about it? Happy New Year, Little1.

.

yeh, it's a kind of breakfast cereal, I think.

I find that since my eyesight has faded somewhat, I cant dwell on my grizzled complexities any more. I suppose they're still there, all grizzled and complex. Like a bear in a labyrinth. or something.

aiee. no. once size not fit all.

Hi there Jago. the front of the orbit is yin. less easy to feel. when I first felt it, I described it as a waterfall.. because the back channel can be so palpable, we expect the front to be too. but it aint. not at first, anyhow. and it is always different in feel. How do you know you've got it, if you cant feel it?.. just keep circulating, feeling what you feel, and the trust the 'gaps' will be sorted, by the way of such things.

.

ha! I was accustomed to the old board in which an afterthought though posted as a new post, would come up as integrated into the first post, if posted within a brief time frame.. but hey, I get to be a triple poster, too. Now I'll stop going on about it.

I dont have a creative solution as to how to save the really helpful and wonderful material here into an easily searchable system. As I write that I also wonder if I believe that we need to pre - sift so that anyone searching doesnt have to do their own wading and discriminating.

Pietro - yes, people pushing the votes of their own school I 'm sure would be the case, and Trunk.. what you say sounds right in theory. But ime people vote for content that they agree with,and they praise posts that they are impressed by, not what is neccessarily correct/helpful/informative... newbies in particular are easily impressed, so we could end up with stuff coming up on searches which is just plain obvious and of course possibly misleading. Pietro, the fact is we wont be voting on posts because they are grammatically correct or internally consistent.. I dont believe so anyhow: I believe voting will be subjective and partial unless laid down specifically to be otherwise. And that would involve some rules, which in themselves would be hierarchical.

.

Pietro, I was ing, about your triple post. I'm not keen on the voting on posts and 'reputation' thing. I dislike that, at other forums I've seen, it's competetive and hierarchical and I dontlikeit.

No need to go on about it,Pietro. Oh! No emoticons! Ok Thanks for the new board it's grrrrreat. xxxxxx