Wells

http://www.facebook.com/groups/thefajinproject It all happend in Joseph Laronges's school. Laronge is clearly NO Clyman-groupie as his phrasing and interpretation of the situation proves! Therefore his credibility seems unassailable to me. ^Above is Laronge's personal interpretation of the situation: Obviously he believes that it is possible that Chang hold back to not kill Clyman. However, Clyman was in fact not only not killed, he seemed not affected at all! ^Fact is, that Clyman and Chang treated each other with mutual honesty, friendliness and respect before, during and after the golden bell test. ^Fact is that Clyman was NOT affected by Grandmaster Chang's hits! He didn't even stumble back after the uppercut: ^Clyman did not have to make one single step backwards after the uppercut! => The objective observation of the incident shows that Clyman's Golden Bell technique gave him the ability to absorb the blows of Grandmaster Chang without being affected. The question if this is possible because Grandmaster Chang hold back or because Clyman's powers were so overwhelming even back then that even Grandmaster Chang's hardest hits would have or actually have simply "bounced off" his golden bell technique, is in the area of personal interpretation, because Chang did not comment on the fact if he did hit Clyman with full force or not! However, the mutual honesty, respect and friendliness that defined the contact between Clyman and Chang implicates that Chang gave Clyman a "real" test of his Golden Bell abilities!

In your face, feminists!!! In a few years, all of women's sports will be dominated by MALES, excuse my political incorrectness, I of course mean transgender women! We now have reached the state of Sodom & Gomorrha... Sit back and enjoy the show.

Your loss.

All you do is in fact to fight against the reality of real nei kung masters so you don't have to admit to yourself that you wasted your life with gymnastics while others achieved what you pretend to have achieved!

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5043510/ "Conclusions: Our results from both the systematic review and the meta‐analysis suggest that ADF [alternate day fasting] is an efficacious dietary method, and may be superior to VLCD [very low calorie diet, < 800 kcal ] for some patients because of ease of compliance, greater fat‐mass loss and relative preservation of fat‐free mass. Head‐to‐head randomized clinical trials are needed to further assess relative efficacy of these two approaches."

The science of eating every other day / alternate day fasting.

...

That sounds reasonable. I guess an apology of me towards you is appropriate.

In regard to the fact that no dzogchen student in the West so far ever achieved "fruition" (rainbow body), your enthusiasm seems a bit out of place

"Less uncertainty" about what exactly?

.

Well, I did already.

Thanks you very much, I feel honored!

Well, sometimes I feel like an actor in a Shakespeare play...

I'm in. What's your PayPal account name? P.S.: I'll snitch on you to the mods if that's a scam!

Thank you, everything went as planned.

I was busy recently with scientifically planning and carefully executing a marriage proposal...

Thank you very much and don't worry, it won't happen again!

True, and thank you very much!

I'm back.