froggie

instant poll

ok great. =) sure, politeness doesn't have a place where it doesn't have a place. let it be in the eye of the observer. my guess is that it's a little bit different in virtuality. but anyway...

the why: it just seems nicer (i could be wrong) hey, are you trying to put me in a catch22 situation? is it working???

1. it depends yes. 2. ofcourse my opinion: i would prefer to give detailed answers and receive detailed answers also. there is always room for your own research, no matter. when lack of time or something else, i'd add small note instead of simply yes/no p.s. mandatory, if i am correct, doesn't even mean enforced, (it means something along the lines of 'guideline'. http://thinkexist.com/dictionary/meaning/mandatory/) but that being said, i didn't mean it in the way that you have to or else you can't 'join', but more like a guideline to avoid some thing which may be unpleasent in nature. i did mean it more like a courtesy.

(apologies for the length of this post in advance.) - another problem is that the USA had a leading role, that people threw away on 'a Bush' (whatever that is.) but when going on to give my own idea/interpretation/definition of what 'a Bush' is, i would say that it was a lie perpetuating on an idea and corrupting it, to the very last drop. in other words playing with the ideas and ideals of people but the drive and intention behind it is the total opposite of what it should be and could have been. (and incidentally -coundn't- have been anything else than what it was, because of the morals and means of the person perpetuating 'the idea' on an agenda which wasn't there for most people's (and dare i say it planetary) best good. let alone humanity (which is what we are, in a sense, aren't we?) there is nothing behind words if your reality says something different. in again other words: if someone tells you something and the reality is showing something different, chances are still that you are still going to believe the words as 'the truth'. - there have been people who have done the same, and there are people still doing the same thing. and i guess it (only) works if people believe the words and take the rest for granted any way it goes. if i told you the color green is bad and i put some idea behind it that seems familiar and good to you, you probably aren't going to have a problem with accepting that the color green is bad for some strange reason. - let's talk about manipulation, what it does, what it doesn't do for you, and if it really is necessary. or not. and if things can be good by themselves. (in my opinion: sure, why not?) my question: is obama a good person with good intentions for most if not all people (preferably all, yes?) and with intelligent solutions that work or is he really something else

*bumplestiltskin* "all things are possible", but i feel at least there is some upside going on for right now at least. and an upside in my opinion is -something- better than going down down down. (and because of dogma and false interpretation and misrepresentation (and corruption, by any means) no less! ofcourse all problems are not yet gone. maybe they can be, maybe they can not be. things are steps anyway, yes? no matter how you look at it? for the rest let's just call and see it as an open ending anyway indeed! but don't forget everyone's individual responsibility, ever(!), also. (positively speaking, fwiw, now and tomorrow and who knows when or what. how do you compare small things within/and big things anyway? just by doing it and participating, no? critical thinking and critical mass, who said it has to be wrong.) ...over?

When looking at the photo of http://www.palyulproductions.org/html/free_downloads.html i wonder if the ornaments on that stool are actually for example put there for people who can not see energy to make things visible for them as to what could be a possibility of manifestation energywise, and a 'what is happening energetically. or what has happened energetically. or what the energy looks like of someone who has done a certain thing.' but to someone who could possibly see energy this kind of ornaments would not be necessary because they can see some shapes and forms of energy around the person, even if they are sitting in a normal chair. anyway just some food for thought, possibly. and thinking out loud .....

i'm just thinking, if what you say is true, then dissolving blockages is would be one of the most/more important things. but that being said, if the low dan tien were like a capacitor, it would be okay to store some energy there.

Just wanted to see what you are talking about. and bring my 'findings' back around http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Namk...rbu+&emb=0#

umm, like, wow. the idea is really good imo. don't know about the person, but what's wrong with 'attention' if your idea is good? *little bit confused* *just a little* "Press A for A. Press B for B." We could write really interesting user manuals together.

okay; ...that's a goood explanation (not that you have to be bothered with me though, but you don't seem to be anyway) *kicks himself out of here*

I see that a lot. ...A lot of 'cha cha' and 'bla bla', but without any reasons why added to it. I mean, how good can that be, in the end? MAYBE... it should become mandatory, or -at least- common courtesy, to (at least try to) explain -why- a yes or a no or something when replying to something?

hey man, i really like the replies sp far, i just wanted to let you all know that it's appreciated.

ॐ

you can call me contrarian if you like, but somehow it seems to me that thinking in this/that way is exactly the right way to go for (that kind of) new world order, ... not exactly the other way around

Hi Creation - that's a wonderful addition - thank you very much .....

to change something is to start with yourself.

I would like to ask if there's a way to validate the items that are being sold that are helping protect the body (and more specifically, i have learned, the meridians and the individual cells) against cellphone and wireless and those sort and kind of radiations. Are there any truely objective accounts truely worth noticing? I'm curious indeed. Seems like a helpful tool if there would be no hype involved around it (which is not the case i think)

That still doesn't make complete sense to me... Apples and oranges. I can only detect a lacking in nuances, grades and other things. Ofcourse, in a way you may be right ... like it would be the case if someone insists in something when there may be more and greater nuances. But in that case that side doesn't fit and this side doesn't fit either. Apologies if this sounds abstract.

Actually, how would you Really know? From the way you talk it's probably not too difficult to say that you are just as delusional or even more than what you are speaking about. Also i don't think generalisatons work, and also, it wouldn't hurt to brush up your attitude a bit. But like i said before, sometimes it's too easy to talk mostly nonsense. can't really blame you though, but it could be a shame. probably is.

ehhhhh..... good idea though not really bad anyway!

stillness

on the other hand, killing never really helps, it's more like a short term solution? i think it's more about evolution and co existing? but it might still be good to know, for something like self defense? although killing may be a really big extreme. what do you mean by reversing polarities by the way?

it's a great step

that's a pretty good thing in my opinion. can you tell something about the power-level of some of them? Some are very powerful, yes? some are somewhat limited, and some are not powerful at all, is that correct?