MooNiNite

I found the website for the lady's school. Is there a website for his son in Chicago?

Is he done giving healings?

When making points, try not to poke anyone. -Zen Wisdom

I need to have more pie in my lower dantien.

Historical locality is closer to race than nationality.

nice quote! However, if moving forward in life is your goal, there are truths.

Ideas are tools, it is intent that is accusingly destructive or productive.

"Well the whole point for me is that I don't have one because I think the flaw is basically trying to divide people in this way." You're saying it is flawed to divide people by historical locality and physical characteristics.

The goal is never to completely define anything, that would be impossible in the realm of thought, language, and ideas. You're discriminating against an extent of discrimination and limiting yourself functionality. So once one adds historical locality to human characteristics they are overly flawed? But not when they just observe characteristics? "The people in Europe have brown hair." That observation is flawed and evil? What about the functionality behind such observations, what if you had a hair company and offered a product that dyed brown hair blonde?

I'd like to see you present a better and more accurate model.

Sure.

It is only bad based on your intent. The expression itself isnt evil. Although society has imprinted a bad connotation towards the phrase.

You do understand that a scientific basis is a relative proportion or percentage right? So even the depth of a scientific basis is relative. Anyways, Anyways, here is what you're looking for: http://www.geographynotes.com/human-geography/major-physical-characteristics-of-racial-groups/1012

Are you arguing that different races of humans don't have defining characteristics? Or that the idea of race is ambiguous? If the second, I would argue that every idea conceived by a human is ambiguous; it's pointless to just say everything is relative.

Just finished Marco Polo. It was enjoyable.

This thread proposes the idea that while discussing a topic with others there could be better or worse ways to engage in discussion.

A gravity hill, simply put, is a sloped area where gravity seems to be faltering: causing objects to rise against the slope. http://minethehive.com/2017/06/scrutiny-gravity-hills-and-localized-distortions/

Well aparently Negative Mass was created in a lab. http://minethehive.com/2017/05/tidings-collected-madness-april-2017/ "In general, if you push towards an object, the object moves away from you. With an object of negative mass, if you push towards it, it comes towards you." https://phys.org/news/2017-04-physicists-negative-mass.html

Actually my friend wrote it, not me. just fyi.

I find it hard to believe that your explanation is sufficient. But maybe i just need to get out more.

So you have been on a hill that looked down but was really up? I find that hard to believe.

It is interesting, but the "carpenter test" doesnt seem like a valid way to test.

"Not all of these places are illusions, but rather, actual inconsistencies in the direction gravity pulls. Any large mountain does this as well. On the side of a mountain gravity does not pull in the same direction as it does off the mountain. It pulls more in the direction of the mountain, rather than in the direction of earth's core. There are just some places on earth where this difference is extreme." Possibly electromagnetism field is being distorted and causing gravity to nullify.

People currently only have the ability to "Thank you" posts. Websites like StackOverflow, when a post gets "thumbs down" by enough people, the actual post fades, so it is less visible.

this is a software inefficiency. The current software isnt advanced and cant be upgraded by the owners of the website.