MooNiNite

To say that the people who built the large structures at Gobekli Tepe were not civilized is crazy to me. Simple hunter gatherers couldnt biuld those large structures, there was also tools left behind that they found. And sophisticated out-pressed carvings.

Yes it does. It completely rewrites the history books. Especially the dating of the Sphynx. This is basically exactly what I was trying to ask Marblehead. The stonework of ancient cultures actually gets more sophisticated as we go back in time. Saksaywaman for example. "Gobekli Tepe consists of large stones, so we have people that were already capable of building these large structures 12,000 years ago." The carving is also outpressed. The deliberate burying of the site is also very interesting.

How could humans be alive for so long and not be civilized until roughly 10,000 years ago?

insulting people over the internet is really awesome. ..

Well the ancient Sumerians were for a while considered the earliest civilization at around 4500BC. Now we have Gobekli Tepe at around 10,600BC.

I have no idea how long humans have been around. Neither does science. They have however dated human civilization incorrectly, and that is a big deal.

This documentary explains that it is actually a chemical waste product. They explain this is actually how we obtain flouride for our drinking water: "Flouride is produced as an industrial byproduct of the phosphate mining industry. Decades ago, fluoride used to be released into the air through the smokestacks of phosphatemining operations, but this resulted in the widespread death of cattle and plants on nearby farms and ranches. To stop the deaths, phosphate mining companies installed “wet scrubbers” that captured thetoxic fluoride chemical vapors. While consumers might think that deadly fluoride chemicals captured in these wet scrubbers are disposed of as hazardous industrial waste, the surprising truth is that they are sold to cities and towns as “fluoride” to be dumped into the local water supply where they are consumed by adults and children." http://www.infowars.com/documentary-exposes-fluoride-truth-industrial-waste-passed-off-as-medicine/

This guy seems pretty adamant that fluoride water leads to cancer and death. However, I'm open to ideas as to why water fluoridation could be beneficial

So you only like it because of its benefits towards the teeth?

While i'm open to the idea of a Flat Earth and I'm certainly not going to push people away from discussing their ideas surrounding it, i am inclined to believe the earth is spherical.

You keep telling people that they need help from you. Like your some threat out to catch them or something. I said "jesus" because the manner in which to talk to people is extremely rude

It's very possible that the earth is a sphere...

Well i dont trust Nasa or the government. You can say oh well that's stupid. And I would just tell you that your free to believe what you want.

i agree. So it is important not to be so rigid and assume everyone is wrong when they disagree with conventional understanding. Wim Hof for example just rearranged modern science understanding of the human body's capabilities to withstand both cold and heat. You would think after 6,000 years we would know the limits of the human body, but nope.

That Gopekli Tepi changed mainstream understanding of human civilization as we know it.

What's funny to me is that you completely disregard the facts.

well i would disagree. They date it at 6000 years ago. which is wrong, and Im not sure how else to teach you. so oh well..

Typo, i ment civilization. But my point is still valid. "Civilization as we know it is only about 6,000 years old." -Mainstream science But wait its actually way over 11,000 years old. ... So how old are humans on earth? And what is the first civilization? I remember being taught in school it was the Mesopotamian Civilization, which is wrong..

Here you go the oldest civilizations according to the mainstream understanding. http://www.ancienthistorylists.com/ancient-civilizations/10-oldest-ancient-civilizations-ever-existed/

They teach Human civilization goes back to 4,000 bc

I'm not really sure what the point of your post is. But if you think that the scientific establishment regarding human life on earth is accurate i would disagree.

If they promote evolutionary biology, then why are we so much more evolved than anything else on this planet? And wouldn't the age of humans on Earth be even slightly important to them?

Im not disagreeing with you. I said "thank you" for your comment. As to the certainty behind the paper published by Northwestern university, i'm not sure. Its hard to actually tell what is 400 miles beneath our feet. The link with the ancient maps of earth is really the major aspect of my comment.

The history of the human race on earth is interesting too. Once again the mainstream understanding is completely wrong. Modern science teaches that humans are only 5,000 years old. But Gobekli Tepe is firmly dated 11,600 years ago by the German Archaeological institute, with evidence of agriculture. So now they are starting to say that agriculture originated at Gobekli Tepe, which is silly. Zahi Hawass was the former Minister of State for Antiquities Affairs, he doesn't seem to enjoy his career especially when discussing with Graham Hancock. This researcher believes humans are 1 million years old.

The first link refers to it as a "reservoir"