whitesilk

or hair

dawei plays the heart in this constructive card game.

Or just reduce the time complexity, if we are to stay in a linear time variable. We ought realize a real time variable in our descriptions. Square rooting -1 as marblehead now might comprehend, does little to aid a real result.

Very interesting, I recall a moment in my life when I was listening to a cancer treatment patient speak. I noticed a sound unnatural and sensed as it it entered my ear. I can understand the idea that you are communicating. I believe personally, that mathematics cannot however.

So void, if use, as it might be important to me, is needed for thought; what use is von Neumanns' phase theory?

ha, ha, and another laugh. Serious study of the math our ancestors of western lineage have proposed at times, leads me to believe more in simplicity than the complexity we create. Of course, a simple farmer now sits in a combine rather than using a scythe. I guess, truth is use to me.

Relative to the topic in this thread, Ptolemy disproved ancient Greek musical systems in his 'harmonics' ~ 200 A.D. Yet Ptolemy did no understand how to create a proper answer. He knew that the musical system was flawed from this measurements, yet did not know why. Then shortly thereafter died, and left 'harmonics' unfinished. (for the human nature enthusiasts on the forum that might agree not to disagree with ancient Greeks). So from what I gather about truth and harmony and modern physics, could we know (and also admit) there is an error with our perception's because we impose a language of mathematics to describe them and communicate various experiences and natural phoneme?

great stuff for me Thanks! Still somewhat confused. I'm trying to study Ptolemy as well, and confusing my way though his measurements. So to paraphrase your past post, I would write that the observable differences between harmonic yin and yang qi results from summing a double third.

The commutative property states that changing the order does not change the result. Without a time variable, phase would not exist. I guess I am confused.

Isn't that pushing the nickel down?

literally, the first time that I had acupuncture, the electronic translation device told me, 'white beau silk mixes white sugar'.

without trouble, I hope: Can anyone explain this: output.mp4 ? In my opinion, embracing would be a greater path.

Da Lui refers to that book in tai chi chuan and meditation. Good read?

Perhaps the relativity theory is true, and light holds weight. How might one find truth in terahertz radiation? Conceptually, many kelvins would be proof enough. Suppose that our particles of matter are actually just particles of matter, and there is no binding force to keep our biology together. The unseen electromagnetic radiation that surrounds us in various ways influences us to experience 'now' differently from one atop Everest, and one in death valley. So as a mixture of various particles, how exactly might I realize and manifest into what we term life? I believe because I am alive, there is a life force around us and through us. I am more that a mass of potassium and nitrates (whatever those actually are). So back to the original topic, I would like to offer my stance that absolution does exist in some form. Truth can be known by seeing clearly; connecting to the life force that pervades the many individual viewpoints on this planet. Even though our individual perception is flawed or does not exist, what ever was written six pages ago, an absolute truth can exist within or without my own viewpoint. Or, as an afterthought, you could just eat a psychedelic fungus and think that your fingernails are peanuts. The choice is yours.

agreed.

Anyone ever see the netflix show 'the ministry of time'? El Minstro del Tiempo I think in spanish.

So, back to gravity, if we have foreseen our future, what do we do in the present?

I agree the elixir or sweet dew. I guess, I am wondering Tiger Jin about this post because I've been cultivating 'lesser' or small circulation for about a month. Why do you want to move to grand or 'greater' circulation? I am liking lesser heavenly circulation more than enough to proceed. I am practicing, to be honest, a simple greater heavenly circulation, however. It involves only pulling energy through your psychic channels. For simple greater heavenly circulation; start at the lower tan-tien pull to crown through the central channel (tu mo?), pull down to the lower tan-tien though the front channel (jen mo?), pull though the belt channel then up the back channel to the shoulders; out to the center palms through the arm channels; back to the lower tan-tien though the jen mo; up the thrusting channel; down to your soles though the leg channel, and up to the crown, and repeat.

Thank You! We as a culture, society, or people do need to think things through before action, especially in this age. BTW, how does one think out their thoughts?

So why do our Aerospace engineers waste our fossil fuels? That is a question that I cannot answer myself. If you might like to ask that question to an aerospace engineer for me, I would appreciate it.

Say a gardener is told he has free reign to create to most beautiful race track. Now, a race car driver is told that he has free reign over the gardens. What is the result? The only part of my statement that you failed to see is that the inability to make choice causes the interruption your suchness, being, or samadi. I am in agreement. To cling is to lose it. Perhaps? Um or Aum?

Hopefully posting this audio qualifies as fair use. fleetwood_mac__dannys_chant.mp3 I have processed the attached mp3 file. Could any legally minded individuals help explain 'fair use' of audio to me?

such as this interess fluidly may achieve a conclusion, if stopping the interruption is your concern, how would you think it out? If you live an external life, and are conflicted between wanting this or wanting that, imo, the conflict itself is the corruption of thought. Our neurons are like light switches that are stimulated to be on or off, all 200 billion of them. So thinking is okay with suchness, being or samadi. I do wish to keep a few of my light switches working. (hyperbole)

Thanks marblehead, Is copyright really that simple as to simply provide a citation? Looking back, I might need to edit some of my textual posts if I cannot merely provide a source of the material.

to cross reference: https://www.last.fm/music/Fleetwood+Mac/_/Danny's+Chant