Lao Tzu

Sorry, wrong typing. It is Qigong. I never study with any Qigong masters. But I can tell whether he is a cheater based on my knowledge from the books.

I said the popular type of meditation is not good. If I hold above opinion, and I still want to know what the Qigong masters in west look like, so as to let me get a impression of them, and to know what is happening in west. Am I allowed to do that?

Watch it from 34:00

I have read the link, and I don't think I was trolling. In your perspective, I am "trolling", but it is just your subjective point. You say I am trolling, maybe only because you disagree my opinions? If it is true, that is not fair.

So there are lots of different types of meditations. The common meditations are not good ways for pratice Dao. Can I say it this way? Dealing with everything without desire, that is living in Dao.

Firstly, when I said "they are not masters, they are cheaters", "they" means the masters in China, what I asked is about the masters in America. So I didn't deny the answer to my original question here. Secondly, I didn't pretend to do anything. I asked because I want to know who are the Qingong masters in westerns' views. So I really wonder what is wrong with what I did?

1. OK, that need to be discussed. 2. I don't familiar with the story. And I did research about that, and find nothing about that. 3. The common opinions in China is that Confuzius got Dao.

I don't think the author is an immortal, so it is not a book which I like to read.

Sorry, I don't understand.

1. You mean I am hopeless case and simply couldn't get Dao? 2. I never heard about this story, I only know Confuzius regards Lao Tzu as his teacher. 3. I think Confuzius maybe get Dao later, because some sages said Taoism and Confucianism are at same level. 4. At the beginning, I tried to use several other user names, but failed, so I tried the "Lao Tzu" and succeed, so ,,,

Why?

Yes, my opinions are based on my experience.

How did you know it is bullshit?

I got it, thank you.

What is BS?

Why do you say this?

Sorry, I do not understand your this text very well.

Are you talking to me?

That is what I did.

But... that is not true. I HAVE given something, not nothing.

In the thread, I have told my points by which I said there is something wrong. And when I teach the true TAO, how can the guys believe my words is true? So complete proving is almost impossible in a forum.

Because I know I am not the sage LaoZi.

How did you sense the shape of the pineal gland? Shape, which is an image, should be sensed by "seeing". You "saw" its shape with your special eye? And how did you know it is the pineal gland? You compared it with the anatomy medicine book?

This Lao Tzu is not that Lao Tzu