gatito

Without meeting us you wouldn't actually have the faintest idea. Therefore you are again incorrect, as is also the norm.

I've already said that this is a misrepresentation of the facts and therefore incorrect.

Again......so what?

Again......so what?

...

So what?

...

Can't it?

Complete misrepresentation and therefore ubsuprisingly incorrect.

...

No Incorrect means incorrect, so you're obvously incorrect

Incorrect

Enjoy it while it lasts

Not a fact - just your your opinion

Incorrect I don't "think that there's a thing called Direct Path Advaita"

Really? Do you imagine that I care whether you (or anyone else) takes these comments seriously?

Still incorrect

Yes I'm sure that you're wrong 100% certain

Incorrect again

Wrong again

Wrong - as usual

Yes. He absolutely does nail it and his demolition of the false counter arguments is a masterpiece. Nice to see the false premises in todays institutionalised, pseudoacademic "Buddhism" being demolished. Perhaps it will lead to a renaissance of the actual teachings.

Six "likes" (so far). Says it all really.

...

An interesting technical point here CT Nothing that can be said about the Truth is the Truth Even statements such as “I am a man” or “I am a woman” are ultimately untrue. However, no Right Acting person would doubt those relative truths in normal circumstances. Therefore, I’m certainly happy to endorse what yabyum24 has said in this thread, in the same way that I’m happy to endorse what I’ve read of what the Buddha reputedly said. Interestingly, there are many different possible misinterpretations that can be placed on anything that anyone says as well; particularly by religious fanatics who not only misinterpret the words of the Buddha through ignorance but who sometimes deliberately misquote and/or misinterpret what others may say with the sole intent to cause harm. Just to be crystal clear, I am not referring to de facto Buddhists, such as you and many other de facto Buddhists who post on TTBs.